What is a Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate?

Useful Resources for Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate

Recent Rulings on Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate

MARLON WATKINS VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

Strobel Hearing: January 21, 2021 19STCP03386 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate: DENIED Petitioner Marlon Watkins (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission (“Respondent” or Commission”) to set aside its final decision discharging Petitioner from his position as Deputy Sheriff with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“Department”.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

KATHERINE SALGADO VS CITY OF BELL GARDENS, ET AL.

CITY OF BELL GARDENS Case Number: 19STCP04839 Hearing Date: January 20, 2021 [Tentative] ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ALBINO GARCIA VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

Writ Proceedings On August 5, 2019, Petitioner filed a verified petition for writ of administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. On November 4, 2019, Respondent and Real Parties filed their answer to the petition. On December 10, 2019, at a trial setting conference, the court set the writ petition for hearing and set a briefing schedule.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

EGAN BADART VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Case No. 20STCP01699 Hearing Date: December 18, 2020 [TENTATIVE] ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER IN PART [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING BOND WAIVER DEMURRER: Respondent, State of California Department of Industrial Relations, demurrers to the Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate and Stay of Administrative proceedings filed by Petitioner, Egan Badart.

  • Hearing

    Dec 18, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

RAY FU VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

City of Los Angeles, Respondent Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: December 15, 2020 19STCP0247 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate Petitioner Ray Fu (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent City of Los Angeles (“Respondent”) to set aside its February 6, 2018, decision to discharge him as a chemist in the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP” or “Department”). Judicial Notice Respondent’s RJN Exhibits 1-2 – Granted.

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

DANIEL APOLINAR VS LOS ANGELES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ET

Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: December 15, 2020 BS171448 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate: GRANTED IN PART Petitioner Daniel Apolinar (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent Los Angeles Civil Service Commission (“Respondent” or “Commission”) to set aside the Commission’s decision terminating his employment as a deputy sheriff with Real Party in Interest Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“Department”).

  • Hearing

    Dec 15, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

EVERET GORDON MILLER, ET AL. VS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE, ET AL.

(“NRI”) (collectively “Petitioners”) petition for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondents California Department of Real Estate (“DRE”) and Daniel Sandri, Acting Real Estate Commissioner (collectively “Respondents”) to set aside an administrative decision revoking Petitioners’ real estate broker licenses. Factual Background According to DRE records, DRE issued NRI a corporate real estate broker license on March 2, 1979. ( AR 123-126.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ALEKSANDR REZNITSKIY, ET AL VS. MARIN COUNTY, ET AL

Petitioners have filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging the Board’s decision. Discussion 1. The Applicability of the HAA to Petitioners’ Project 1 BIO-1,3, and BIO-3.1 and BIO-4.1, are attached as Exhibits B and F to Petitioners” request for judicial notice, respectively. DES~3,b, DES-4.1, DES»4.e and DES-4.c are attached as Exhibit B to Petitioners” request for judicial notice submitted with their reply brief.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

ERIC MOREJON VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

We do not disagree with any of the authorities cited by the Commission for the proposition that failure to obtain judicial review of a determination by an administrative agency by a timely petition for writ of administrative mandate renders the administrative action immune from collateral attack. [Citations.] We simply hold that the cases do not apply here.” (Buckley, supra at 190-191.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

MELISSA TYSON, ET AL. VS VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CCP section 1094.6(c) sets forth the documents to be included in the “complete record of the proceedings” for a petition for writ of administrative mandate against a local agency.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

AKELLA V REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

DEMURRER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Petition is overruled. Plaintiff filed a First Amende Petition on 11/17/20. It is well established that an amendatory pleading supersedes the original one, whic ceases to perform any function as a pleading. Thus, an amended complaint supersedes all prio complaints.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

BAKOR INVESTMENTS WHITTIER LLC ET AL VS CITY OF WHITTIER

Because a hearing was required by law for City’s decision, Petitioner’s remedy is a petition for writ of administrative mandate pursuant to CCP section 1094.5. (See Bunnett v. Regents of University of California (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 843, 848.) The court adjudicates both the third and fourth causes of action under section 1094.5.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

SALVADOR STEWART VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

Writ Proceedings On June 24, 2019, Petitioner filed his verified petition for writ of administrative mandate. On January 31, 2020, County filed an answer. On September 28, 2020, Petitioner filed his opening brief in support of the petition.[1] The court has received County’s opposition, Petitioner’s reply, the administrative record, and the joint appendix.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

CATHERINE BRUNI VS CITY OF ALHAMBRA

City of Alhambra, Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: November 24, 2020 19BBCP00002 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate Petitioner Catherine Bruni (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent City of Alhambra (“Respondent” or “City”) to set aside the decision of its Civil Service Commission (“Commission”) to terminate Petitioner from her position as corporal with the Alhambra Police Department (“Department” or “APD”).

  • Hearing

    Nov 24, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

WORTHINGTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

Procedural History On July 30, 2019, Petitioner filed a verified petition for writ of administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. On October 16, 2019, Respondents and Real Party filed their answer to the petition. On January 9, 2020, the court held a trial setting conference and set a briefing schedule.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

FIX THE CITY, INC. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

(“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondents County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (“Respondents”) to set aside Board’s certification of an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for a significant reconstruction project at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (“LACMA” or “Real Party”) on Wilshire Boulevard (“Project”).

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

BORELLA BROTHERS, INC. VS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

Writ Proceedings On June 17, 2019, Petitioner filed its petition for writ of administrative mandate. On June 28, 2019, DLSE filed an answer. On September 8, 2020, Petitioner filed its opening brief in support of the writ petition. The opening brief exceeds the 15-page limit by about 5 pages. (CRC Rule 3.1113(d).) Petitioner’s counsel did not obtain leave of court to file an extra-sized brief.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

GROUP ONE CONSTRUCTION, INC. VS. CONTRACTORS' STATE LICENSE BOARD (DEPT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS)

Petitioners still retain the option to seek judicial review by way of a writ of administrative mandate, to include requesting a stay of any discipline imposed. It would be speculative to conclude at this point that OAH's current procedures will result in a deprivation of due process, and a continuance until in-person hearings may safely resume is not required. Disposition The application is denied.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

JOHN DOE VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Background On August 31, 2018, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate against Respondent. Petitioner challenged his dismissal from UCLA for alleged violations of the UC Policy on Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment and the UCLA Student Conduct Code. On October 10, 2018, Respondent filed an answer. On October 11, 2019, Petitioner filed an opening brief in support of the writ petition. Respondent did not file an opposition.

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

MARTIN IBARRA VS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Procedural History On May 10, 2019, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate. On August 13, 2019, Respondent filed an answer. On March 27, 2020, Petitioner filed his opening brief in support of the petition. The court has received Respondent’s opposition, Petitioner’s reply, the joint appendix, and the administrative record. Standard of Review Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate pursuant to CCP section 1094.5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

AMENEH MOUSAVI VS FUTURE IRRIGATION INC

., Real Party in Interest Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: October 24, 2020 BS175257 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate Phase II Petitioner General Motors, LLC (“Petitioner” or “GM”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent California New Motor Vehicle Board (“Board”) “to set aside and vacate its Decision dated August 13, 2018, in Protest No. PR-2483-16, and to adopt and issue a new and different decision overruling the Protest.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2020

ERIC MOREJON VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

On September 13, 2018, Petitioner dismissed his second cause of action for writ of administrative mandate pursuant to CCP section 1094.5. On September 17, 2018, Respondents County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, and Sheriff Jim McDonnell (“Respondents”) filed a return and answer to the first amended petition. On November 20, 2018, the court held a trial setting conference, which was attended by counsel for Petitioner and Respondents.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

CHRISTOPHER TEACHER VS. CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW

Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate is continued to November 6, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JOHN DOE VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Regents of The University of California (UCLA), Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: October 20, 2020 19STCP02886 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate: DENIED Petitioner John Doe (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing Respondent Regents of the University of California (“Respondent”) to set aside a decision of the University of California, Los Angeles (“UCLA”) to dismiss Petitioner from the university for violating an “Interim Exclusion” pending an investigation of alleged

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

4741 SC LLC VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

., LLC Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: October 15, 2020 BS174087 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate Petitioner 4741 SC, LLC (“Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of administrative mandate directing City of Los Angeles (“City” or “Respondent”) to set aside a decision of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (“Commission”) approving a 14-unit residential development pursuant to state and local density bonus laws.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.