Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

76-100 of 10000 results

HUGO PLANCARTE VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC

Further, Plaintiff also failed comply with the Court's May 14, 2020 Order requiring a Joint Report regarding the meet and confer efforts conducted and the status of this dispute, to be filed on or before June 17, 2020. Interestingly, Plaintiff's Reply Brief conveniently omits addressing this failure, even though it is argued in Defendant's Opposition Brief.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

INVESERVE CORPORATION VS. GGG HOLDINGS, L.L.C., ET AL

Two prerequisites for the imposition of non-monetary sanctions are: (1) there must be a failure to comply; and (2) the failure must be willful. (Vallbona v. Springer (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1525, 1545.) The party requesting sanctions under CCP §2023.030 and §2023.010(g) must establish that the other party has failed to comply or disobeyed a court order to provide discovery. (CCP §2023.010(g); Miranda v. 21st Century Ins. Co. (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 913, 929 [first requirement of failure to comply].)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ANTHONY SAM VS RENEE KWAN ET AL

The Board is a Bona Fide Purchaser for Value A “quiet title” action is maintained to establish or “quiet” title to or an interest in real property as between adverse claimants. (Code Civ. Proc., § 760.020(a).) The “object of [a quiet title] action is to finally settle and determine, as between the parties, all conflicting claims to the property in controversy, and [for a court] to decree to each such interest or estate therein as he may be entitled to.” (Western Aggregates, Inc v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ALEX PEREZ VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL.

To the extent Beacon lacks information, it should provide a response compliant with CCP §2031.230: “A representation of inability to comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

TOROVERDE, INC. VS. ELEMENT 7, INC.

Thus, defendants have made the required showing and plaintiff has failed to rebut it, requiring the denial of plaintiff’s motion without prejudice to plaintiff refiling it after plaintiff qualifies to do business in California. Defendants are ordered to give notice of the ruling unless notice is waived.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS VIKRAM J. SINGH, M.D., ET AL.

On May 18, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte application to unseal the complaint. On June 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant application of Anne Raven to appear as counsel pro hac vice. ANALYSIS: Applicant Anne Raven seeks admission to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff in this action, and to be associated as co-counsel with Ryan M. Fawaz. (Raven Decl., ¶¶ 1, 9.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

HAMID VS. NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the ruling to the LWDA, and to defendants, to serve the LWDA with his original moving papers as well as any new papers filed for future hearings, and to file a proof of service showing compliance.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

ORLANDO J CASTANO, JR VS CHRIS BROWN

Legal Standard Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. §1285.) When a petition to confirm an award is filed, the superior court has four courses of conduct available: to confirm the award, to correct and confirm it, to vacate it, or to dismiss the petition. (Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp. (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 1, 10.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

FORWARD FINANCING, LLC VS CAMS COMPANY PACKAGING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL.

The hearing was then continued to May 1, 2020 due to the novel Coronavirus, COVID-19. On March 2, 2020, Petitioner filed a memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition brief. On August 4, 2020, Petitioner filed a Request to Continue Hearing of the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. LEGAL STANDARD CCP §1285 permits any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made to petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

GARY PATENT ET AL VS OLATUNJI BANDELE D V M ET AL

Defendants’ counsel explains that his hourly rate is $165.00; he incurred 5.3 hours related to this motion; and anticipates incurring an additional 10 hours to review an opposition, prepare a reply, and attend the hearing. (Platt Decl., ¶ 9.) The Court finds that Defendants are entitled to seek sanctions against Plaintiff Derrick Abrenica for his failure to comply with the notice for demand of the IME and for his failure to attend the scheduled IME.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

(“Hummingbird”) failed to provide him with rest and meal breaks, failed to pay him all wages due, including overtime, and failed to provide him with accurate wage statements. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendants Hummingbird and Does 1-50 for: Failure to Provide Rest Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Provide Meal Periods—Cal. Labor Code § 226.7 Failure to Pay Minimum Wage—Cal. Labor Code § 1197 Failure to Pay Overtime—Cal.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ANAHEIM GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

Continued to 8/21/2020 on the court’s own motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

SHAWN STEWART VS SMARTCLINIC, INC., ET AL.

Although Plaintiff has undergone surgical procedures to treat the damage caused by defendants’ failure to diagnose and/or treat osteomyelitis in his right middle finger, Plaintiff will never have full use of that finger again. (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

LARA VS. MARUCHAN, INC.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Court Order of Individual Claim Arbitration or to Reconsider Same is denied. Defendant Maruchan, Inc.’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted. Plaintiff has not provided any legitimate basis for this court to vacate or reconsider its prior ruling, made almost eight months before plaintiff filed this motion, compelling plaintiff to arbitrate her individual claims and staying her class and PAGA claims.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

FRED BERALUS VS HONDA OF SANTA MONICA ET AL

On November 15, 2019, Honda filed the instant Petition to Confirm Arbitrator Award Dismissing Action with Prejudice. Beralus has not filed an Opposition. Discussion MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

Continued to 8/21/2020 on the court’s own motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

HORIZON TIRE, INC. VS JESUS JASSO

The court reduces attorney’s fees to $1,885.00, consistent with Local Rule 3.214. Background Plaintiff Horizon Tire, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: In June 2014, Jesus Jasso, dba Jesse’s Tires (“Defendant”), filled out a credit application to allow purchases of Plaintiff’s tired for Defendant. Defendant also signed a personal guaranty.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

XIUFANG WANG, ET AL. VS VALU MART CO., ET AL.

Further, narrowing the scope of the documents sought to health and driving-related incidents would sufficiently limit the production of documents to information relevant to Loe’s sudden emergency defense. At this time, the Court will grant the motion to quash because the deposition subpoenas are overbroad as to scope of subject matter regarding medical-related employment records.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RAUL ESPARZA VS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL.

During the warranty period, the vehicle developed various defects including cooling system defects, Bluetooth defects, defects causing the window to fail to roll up, defects causing loud noises and a rough idle/drive, the failure of the water pump, among several others. (Compl. ¶ 9.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

CELL-CRETE CORPORATION VS. SCOTT TAYLOR

CCP §2023.030 also permits the Court to impose terminating sanctions for discovery misuses, which are defined by CCP §2023.010 to include the failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery and the failure to comply with a Court discovery order.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CYRUS ETEMAD VS VERJ SARKISSIAN, ET AL.

The term was from August 15, 2008 to February 27, 2009, and continued for 6-month terms unless one of the parties provided the other of cancellation at least 30 days prior to the end of each successive term. On June 24, 2011, the parties entered into the Parking Contract Amendment to extend the Parking Contract for 5 years until June 24, 2016; the amendment also gave Plaintiff the option to extend the term for a subsequent 5 years by giving notice to Defendants prior to June 24, 2016. (Compl., ¶¶10-11, Ex.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BINGHAM VS. ACORNS GROW, INC.

Continued to 10/23/2020 by Stipulation and Order.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

TRACEY CALLAHAN MOLNAR VS THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE CO OF

Merits On review of the proposed amendment to the complaint, the Court finds Plaintiff fails to show facts sufficient to support an inference of conscious disregard of probable consequences on the part of Guardian's failure to modernize the elevators. Plaintiff argues Guardian had actual knowledge, as well as imputed knowledge through its agent, FPI, of the elevators' alleged unsafe condition prior to Plaintiff's accident.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

XIANGHUA ZHEING VS ANTHONY JOSEPH CURATO

PARTY’S REQUEST Plaintiff asks the Court to set aside the February 26, 2020 dismissal because Plaintiff’s counsel failed to calendar the February 26, 2020 hearing, which caused his failure to appear at the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

INTERNATIONAL COLLECTION CORP. VS QUYEN DOAN

An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (Settlement), an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment as to Defendant Moncada and an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions for Plaintiff’s Failure to Appear are set for August 14, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.