Discover if Hon. Holly is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample
Download Hon. Holly ReportThe Hon. Carter P. Holly is a judge for the San Joaquin County Superior Court in California. He was appointed to the bench by former Governor Pete Wilson in 1994. He filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. James P. Darrah (Ret.).
Judge Holly received his bachelor's degree from the University of California, Irvine in 1974. He earned his J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in 1977. He then graduated with his LL.M. in tax law from Boston University School of Law in 1979.
Prior to his appointment to the bench, Holly spent his entire legal career in private practice. He first practiced at the law firm of Neumiller and Beardslee from 1979 to 1981. He then joined Mayall, Hurley, Knutsen, Smith, and Green in 1981 and was named a partner there in 1989. He remained in that capacity until receiving the call to the bench.
He served as a judge pro tem for the Stockton Municipal Court.
Holly was also elected to serve a four-year term on the San Joaquin County Planning Commission.
His memberships included the North Stockton Rotary Club, the Child Abuse Prevention Council, and the San Joaquin County Bar Association.
While on the bench, Judge Holly has presided in the Civil Department.
CITY OF TRACY, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS MAXIMINO V. GALVAO ET AL.
May 20, 2020 | San Joaquin County
The Demurrer is continued on the Court's own motion to August 13, 2020 at 9:00 AM in Department 10B.
If a hearing is requested on the tentative, please email your request to: [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day before your hearing. Otherwise, the tentative ruling will become the fi...
May 20, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Defendants CoventBridge (USA), Inc. and Katherine Schuft have brought a special motion to strike the complaint filed by Plaintiff Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company, under section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (anti-SLAPP). The parties have filed timely opposition and reply briefs, and have r...
DEPARTMENT STORES NATIONAL BANK VS RAMZI ZUMOUT
May 20, 2020 | San Joaquin County
The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted
No opposition filed. Facts were ordered deemed admitted.
Counsel to prepare order after hearing.
If a hearing is requested on the tentative, please email your request to: [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day before ...
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default is granted due to invalid service and lack of notice to Defendants.
No opposition filed.
If a hearing is requested on the tentative, please email your request to: [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day before your hearing.
The ma...
EDWARDS BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS VS CAROLYN CHATMON LEE
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Appearance required.
The matter will be heard remotely by telephone at its scheduled date and time:
(209)992-5590
Bridge# 6939
Pin# 3892
NANCY COLLUM-BRADFORD ET AL. VS EXACTECH, INC. ET AL.
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Defendant's Motion for Order Re Pro Hac Vice is granted.
If a hearing is requested on the tentative, please email your request to: [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day before your hearing. Otherwise, the tentative will become the final ruling of the Court.
The matter will be...
JOSE TRINIDAD LOPEZ-CHAVEZ VS VINCENTE A AYALA ET AL.
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Defendants, Vincente and Araceli Ayala (the Ayalas), bring a motion for summary judgment/adjudication on the complaint filed by Plaintiff, Jose Trinidad Lopez-Chavez.
After due consideration of the Motion, and the documentary evidence submitted in support, and having not received an Opposition to...
PATRICIA LEON ET AL. VS FCA US LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL.
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
This matter is referred to Phyllis Berger Esq. as Discovery Referee. Court's order to follow.
If a hearing is requested on the tentative, please email your request to: [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day before your hearing. Otherwise, the tentative ruling will become the final ru...
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Appearance required.
Opposition brief was not scanned and unavailable to the Court.
The matter will be heard remotely by telephone at its scheduled date and time:
(209)992-5590
Bridge# 6939
Pin# 3892
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. ET AL. VS EARL SING, INC. ET AL.
May 18, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Appearance Required
The matter will be heard remotely by telephone at its scheduled date and time:
(209)992-5590
Bridge# 6939
Pin# 3892
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS GLORIA MOFFET
May 04, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Appearance is required.
Tentative rulings for Law and Motion will be posted electronically by 1:30 p.m. the day before the hearing. Any party wishing to contest or argue the tentative ruling must email the court at [email protected] that they intend to appear remotely no later than 4...
FRANCES MCLEOD ET AL. VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
Mar 10, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Demurrer is continued on the Court's own motion to June 11, 2020 at 09:00 AM in Department 10B.
...CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS LORAINA GARCIA
Mar 10, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Motion for Entry of Judgment is granted.
Order and Judgment will be entered.
...DAVID ROWLEY ET AL. VS THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS
Mar 10, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Motion to Strike is granted.
No opposition filed.
Order to be provided by the Plaintiff.
...Mar 10, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Appearance required.
...RUBY TEXEIRA ET AL. VS MICHAEL SHERRILL ET AL.
Mar 10, 2020 | San Joaquin County
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Ruby Teixeira has filed a demurrer to and a motion to strike portions of the Answer filed by Defendant Louis Dawang. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to strike portions of Defendant’s Cross-Complaint. Both parties have filed timely opposition and reply briefs. As more f...
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS MIYELI V. ARVIZU
Mar 09, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted.
Judgment will be entered.
...FLORENZ STOREY VS TIMOTHY J. COYKENDALL ET AL.
Mar 09, 2020 | San Joaquin County
1. Defendant's Renewed Motion for Terminating Sanctions.
2. Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Responses to Supplemental Special Interrogatories.
3. Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Responses to Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set One and Request for Sanction...
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS ALYSSA CARSON
Mar 09, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Motion for Entry of Judgment is granted.
Judgment will be entered.
...Mar 04, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Plaintiff's Application for Writ of Possession After Hearing is granted.
Plaintiff is to prepare the order.
...WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS JULIE A SERRANO
Mar 04, 2020 | San Joaquin County
TENTATIVE RULING ON REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
On December 3, 2019, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Plaintiff”) filed Request for Judicial Notice in support of its motion for summary judgment or in the altern...
THE ESTATE OF SHIRLEY BRINSON ORNDORFF ET AL. VS TIMOTHY BECHTEL ET AL.
Mar 04, 2020 | San Joaquin County
It is well-settled that there is a “strong policy in favor of liberal pleading.” Mesler v. Bragg Mgmt. Co. (1985) 39 C.3d 290, 296.
Defendant, Port City Operating Company, LLC dba St. Joseph’s Medical Center of Stockton and Dignity Health (St. Joseph’s) submits a Request for Judicial Notice asking...
LEONIL TALAROC VS MUSCO FAMILY OLIVE CO.
Mar 03, 2020 | San Joaquin County
Defendant, Musco Family Olive Co., filed a Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint and a Motion to Strike Portions of the Second Amended Complaint.
After due consideration of the moving papers, the oppositions and the replies, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
Demurrer
“A plaintiff alleging u...
SALLEE HER VS MISSION LINEN SUPPLY ET AL.
Mar 02, 2020 | San Joaquin County
All 3 motions are granted. Verified responses to be provided to Defendant within 20 days from March 3, 2020. $510.00 sanctions awarded against Plaintiff and her attorneys payable to Defendant within 20 days from March 3, 2020.
...
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.
