arrow left
arrow right
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • MERCADO, ZASKIA vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE INC PREMISES LIABILITY COMMERCIAL-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 180154586 E-Filed 08/21/2023 04:29:25 PM 92358-5 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA ZASKIA MERCADO, CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2019-CA-001939-ON vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC., Defendant. ____________________________/ DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED AUGUST 16, 2023 NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant, CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC, by and through the undersigned attorneys, and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280, 1.330, and 1.350, hereby files its Objections to and Motion for Protective Order in Response to Plaintiff’s Notice of Taking Proposed August 16, 2023 Deposition Topic and Duces Tecum of Defendant’s Corporate Representative, and states as follows: 1. This is a premises liability lawsuit arising from an incident that occurred on June 2, 2017, at the Cheddar’s Casual Café located at 875 W. Osceola Parkway, Kissimmee, FL 34741, attached hereto as Exhibit A is Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2. On August 18, 2021, the Court ordered that the Corporate Representative Deposition in this case as well as the Corporate Representative Deposition for this case styled Piedrahita, Zulayv. Cheddar's Casual Café, Inc., (Case No. 19-CA-01012-ON venued in Osceola County) were to be consolidated and to take place on the same date. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and accurate copy of the August 18, 2021 Order. 3. Pursuant to the August 18, 2021 Court’s Order, it was agreed that the consolidated deposition of the corporate representative for both cases was scheduled to take place on October 19, 2022; however, forty minutes into the deposition, Plaintiff’s counsel unilaterally suspended the deposition and refrained from going forward with any of the questions as it related to either the CASE NO. 2019-CA-001939-ON myriad of deposition topics set forth in either the Notice of Taking Deposition for the Corporate Representative in the Mercado and/or Piedrahita case. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is the October 19, 2022 Deposition Transcript for Defendant’s Corporate representative. UNDEFINED AND UNSPECIFIED DEPOSITION TOPIC 4. Plaintiff’s counsel now attempts to request the deposition of the corporate representative (even after he suspended the October 19, 2022 Deposition) without identifying any delineated and specific deposition topic(s). Instead, the proposed deposition topic requests that the proposed corporate representative designee have a knowledge of the following wide reaching and sweeping deposition topic of this case. See below. DATE/TIME: DEPONENT: LOCATION: T/B/D T/B/D VIA ZOOM (Information to be provided) Milestone Reporting (407) 423-9900 Topic: Zaskia Mercado v. Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Inc. 5. The proposed deposition topic as it relates to an 2017 incident filed in 2020 is overly broad, unduly burdensome, vague, ambiguous and seeks documentation/information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, especially since it is neither limited in scope nor time. Defendant further objects to this Request, as phrased, it may seek documentation/information that was created and prepared in anticipation of litigation and are therefore protected from disclosure by the attorney-client and work product doctrine. 6. Furthermore, Defendant takes issue with the request to depose Defendant’s corporate representative a second time especially since it was Plaintiff’s counsel that suspended -2- CASE NO. 2019-CA-001939-ON the deposition after only 40 minutes and elected not to continue the deposition without asking any questions on any of the 26 deposition topics outlined in Plaintiff’s October 18, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition of the Corporate Representative and Duces Tecum for either the Mercado or Piedrahita cases, attached hereto as Exhibit D. PROPOSED DUCES TECUM NO. 5 IS DUPLICATIVE OF A DUCES TECUM NO. 22 WHICH WAS IS THE SUBJECT OF THE JUNE 13, 2022 AGREED ORDER 7. Defendant also takes issue with Plaintiff’s proposed Duces Tecum No. 5 which seeks “Defendant’s file pertaining to any and all prior incidents involving customer slip and falls at, near, or on the path/corridor to the bathroom at the subject store for the three year period of time immediately preceding the subject incident. This same duces tecum request was previously resolved by this Court as memorialized in the Court’s June 13, 2022 executed Agreed Order attached hereto as Exhibit E, where the Court sustained our objection and granted Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order. 8. In accordance with the Court’s June 13, 2022 Agreed Order, Defendant’s Objections to Duces Tecum No. 22, which sought “[a] true and correct copy of any and all written complaints or documents showing claims or complaints made as to employees and/or customers falling or slipping on substances on Defendant's premises within the last three (3) years in a manner substantially similar to that alleged in the Complaint” was sustained and Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order was granted with respect to this duces tecum. 9. Plaintiff’s counsel now seeking to ignore the Court’s June 13, 2022 Order by attempting to request the same duces tecum in its August 16, 2023 proposed duces tecum. As this same issue was already subject of the Court’s Agreed Order, dated June 13, 2022, Plaintiff should be estopped from circumventing the prior ruling and Agreed Order should remain in effect. -3- Filing # 159465605 E-Filed 10/18/2022 04:15:17 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2019-CA-001939 ZASKIA MERCADO, Plaintiff, vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFE, INC., Defendant. / PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, ZASKIA MERCADO, by and through the undersigned attorneys will take the following Deposition: DATE/TI DEPONE LOCATION: ME: NT: October Corporate VIA ZOOM Milestone Reporting: 19, 2022 Representa EST 11:00 tive Time: Oct 19, 2022 11:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) AM (Produced Join Zoom Meeting by https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82652276139?pwd=NFA2WUJtUUdOc25F Counsel) Z0ZoMjZQa0RxUT09 Meeting ID: 826 5227 6139 Passcode: 133984 One tap mobile +13092053325,,82652276139# US +13126266799,,82652276139# US (Chicago) Dial by your location +1 309 205 3325 US +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 646 931 3860 US +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 386 347 5053 US +1 564 217 2000 US Exhibit D +1 669 444 9171 US +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 719 359 4580 US +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) Meeting ID: 826 5227 6139 Find your local number: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/keEcrOBLWr *Please advise, no less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the above scheduled deposition, if an interpreter is required. upon oral examination before Milestone Reporting, Court Reporters, or a Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, or some other officer duly authorized by law to take depositions and videotaped by Milestone Reporting for the purposes of discovery, for use at trial, or both of the foregoing, or for such other purposes as permitted under the applicable and governing rules. You are to have with you at the time of the deposition, all documents and tangible things listed on the attached Exhibit “B,” pursuant to Rules 1.350 and 1.410(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. YOU ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE TO THE UNDERSIGNED, AT LEAST SEVEN (7) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE DEPOSITION, ALL DOCUMENTS AND TANGIBLE THINGS LISTED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B". Any documents or tangible things responsive to this request which, nonetheless, are not produced by reason of a claim of privilege work product or for any other reason shall be identified in writing by (1) date; (2) author; (3) recipient; (4) general subject matter; (5) identity of person or persons to whom the contents of the document have already been revealed; (6) the identity of the person or entity now in possession or control of the document or tangible thing; and (7) the basis upon which it is being withheld. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 18, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using the Florida Court e-Filing Portal. I further certify that Pursuant to Rule 2.516(b)(1) I forwarded the foregoing this same day via Email to: Kurt M. Spengler, Esq. and Melissa T. Woodward, Esq., Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., 390 N. Orange Ave., Suite 1000, Orlando, FL 32801, via email at ORLcrtpleadings@wickersmith.com. /s/ Manuel Stefan, Esq. Manuel “Manny” Stefan, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 0103389 MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. 4495 South Semoran Blvd. Orlando, FL 32822 Telephone No.: (407) 452-6982 Facsimile No.: (407) 572-0124 Primary email: MStefan@forthepeople.com Secondary email: CVictor@ForThePeople.com Attorney for Plaintiff 3 DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply to each category of documents and tangible things listed below and are incorporated by reference into each specific request for documents and tangible things: The word "DOCUMENT" shall mean all materials within the scope of Rule 1.350(a), including but not limited to, all writings and recordings, (including originals and all nonidentical copies, whether different from the original by reason of any notation made on such copies or otherwise) emails and attachments, correspondence, memoranda, reports, notes, diaries, statements, (written or electronically recorded) summaries, inter-office and intra-office communications, notations of any sort of conversations; and graphic or electronic representations of any kind including without limitation, photographs, charts, microfiche, microfilm, video tape, DVD, DVR, recordings, motion pictures, plans, drawings, blueprints and surveys. A. The words "SUBJECT INCIDENT," "SUBJECT ACCIDENT," “INCIDENT” and "ACCIDENT," shall be deemed to mean the incident alleged in the Plaintiff's Complaint on the date and location as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint. B. The word "STATEMENT" shall be deemed to mean any oral, written or electronically recorded description, recitation, version or explanation of the SUBJECT INCIDENT, given by any person at any time whatsoever, pertaining to the SUBJECT INCIDENT. C. The word "PLAINTIFF" shall mean Zaskia Mercado. D. Any request for production of documents or tangible things shall be deemed to require production of each and every such thing executed, created, prepared, received or in effect at any time to the present, or during any other indicated time period. E. Whenever appropriate, the conjunctive "and" should be interpreted in the disjunctive to include the term "or" and vice versa. F. Whenever appropriate, the singular form of a word should be interpreted in the plural and vice versa. G. Any documents or tangible things responsive to this request which, nonetheless, are not produced by reason of a claim of privilege work product or for any other reason shall be identified in writing by (1) date; (2) author; (3) recipient; (4) general subject matter; (5) identity of person or persons to whom the contents of the document have already been revealed; (6) the identity of the person or entity now in possession or control of the document or tangible thing; (7) the basis upon which it is being withheld. 4 EXHIBIT "A" Defendant, CHEDDAR’S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC.’s Corporate Representative will need consent to testify on its behalf about the following areas of inquiry: 1. The name of the person/entity that possessed/owned/controlled the premises as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint on the date of the incident alleged in the Complaint. 2. The condition of the flooring at the time and location of the incident when Plaintiff was injured. 3. Any and all facts leading up to, concerning, or surrounding any substances or objects on the floor of the subject premises, specifically as identified by the Plaintiff at her deposition, including the substance which is the subject of this action. 4. Any and all facts/information related to inspections of the flooring where the incident occurred for twelve (12) hours prior to the subject incident. 5. Any and all facts/information related to inspections of the flooring where the incident occurred for twelve (12) hours after to the subject incident. 6. Any and all facts/information related to what, if any, caution cones or warning signs were present at the time and location of the subject incident. 7. The name of the person/contractor/entity that was responsible for inspecting the subject premises as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint for any defects and/or dangerous conditions at the time of the incident described in the Complaint. 8. The name of the person/contractor/entity that was responsible for floor of the subject premises as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint at the time of the incident described in the Complaint. 9. The name of the person/contractor/entity that was responsible for cleaning the floor of the subject premises as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint at the time of the incident described in the Complaint. 10. The job responsibilities for employees who had responsibilities for maintenance, cleaning, and inspection of the floor and working at the premises on the date of the incident described in the Complaint. 11. The facts and circumstances surrounding the incident described in the Complaint. 12. Defendant’s Answers to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories. 13. The Defendant’s position and opinion as to how the incident described in the Complaint occurred. 14. The factual basis for all affirmative defenses asserted in the Defendant’s Answer to the Plaintiff’s Complaint. 15. The identity of all persons, known by the Defendant, who witnessed and/or has knowledge regarding the incident described in the Plaintiff’s Complaint. 5 16. The Defendant’s policies and procedures for training new employees regarding maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 17. Any and all computer based training provided to employees/agents in the year preceding the subject incident that relates to maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 18. Any and all video based training provided to employees/agents in the year preceding the subject incident that relates to maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 19. Any and all written materials provided to employees/agents in the year preceding the subject incident that relates to maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 20. The Defendant’s policies and procedures, written or otherwise, that relates to maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 21. Any and all written materials provided to employees in the year preceding the subject incident that relates to employee duties, policies and procedures that relates to maintenance, cleaning, and inspections in effect at the time of the subject incident. 22. Facts related to any individual falling or slipping in Defendant’s premises within the three (3) years prior to the present matter in a manner substantially similar to that alleged in the Complaint. 23. How often there had been a transitory foreign substance on the floor of the subject premises within the three (3) years prior to the present matter. 24. Knowledge about any and all policies of insurance and excess policies of insurance that cover this incident. 25. Knowledge as to policies and procedures of employee conduct, proper grooming, and dress code while working in the premises. 26. The existence of items and areas identified below in the Exhibit “B” section of this Notice, and if said items do not exists, the steps taken to make that determination. 6 EXHIBIT "B" Defendant, CHEDDAR’S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC.’S, Corporate Representative Shall Bring These Items To The Deposition Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.350 and 1.410(c): 1. All statements made by any witnesses to the subject accident at the subject premises as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2. All statements made by the Plaintiff pertaining to or concerning the subject matter. 3. All photographs of Plaintiff depicting injuries received in the subject incident. 4. All photographs of the incident scene and surrounding areas. 5. All photographs of the dangerous condition as alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint. 6. All surveillance video/pictures of Plaintiff taken during or following the subject incident. 7. All written documents received by Defendant prior to or on the date of this incident relating to or discussing the condition which Plaintiff alleges to be a dangerous condition in Plaintiff's Complaint. 8. All surveillance/security/CCTV video footage of the subject incident and of the walkway in which Plaintiff slipped and fell in during the 4 hour period of time immediately preceding the subject incident and immediately following the subject incident. 9. A copy of any and all insurance agreements, insurance policies or agreements of any kind of nature under which any person or company carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part of all of a judgment that may be entered in this action or to indemnify or reimburse any payments made to satisfy any such judgment or settlement, including but not limited to a certified copy of the declarations sheet as to each such policy. 10. A copy of any incident/accident/witness report or other documents done in the ordinary course of business containing information about the incident alleged in the Complaint, completed by you, or your agents, representatives, or employees surrounding the subject accident. 11. Any and all inspection or check-off sheets or other documents showing who performed inspections, what kind of inspections were performed, the times of the inspections or other information about the inspections that might have been done on the date of the subject accident, as well as the five (5) days before that date in the area where the Plaintiff fell. 12. Any and all documents relating to any inspections that may have been done on the date of the subject accident, the five (5) days before that date and the five (5) days after that date on Defendant's premises. 13. Time sheets, clock cards or any other documents showing the hours and time worked by any employees working on the date of the subject accident, with responsibilities for inspecting the premises for dangerous conditions, cleaning up dangerous conditions or maintaining the premises. 7 14. Inspection sheets and/or and other documents for inspections that were used on the date of the subject accident, or that are now used by employees at Defendant's premises, for inspections. 15. A true and correct copy of any contracts or agreement with any entity used by Defendant with any responsibilities for inspecting the subject premises for dangerous conditions or for training your employees about such. 16. A true and correct copy of any and all written inspection, maintenance procedures or policies in place on the date of the subject accident, at Defendant's premises. 17. A true and correct copy of any and all safety manuals or videos, inspection manuals or videos or training manuals or videos that any employee who was working on the date of the subject accident, with responsibilities for inspecting the premises for dangerous conditions, cleaning up dangerous conditions or maintaining the premises may have received from Defendant. 18. All Defendant's policies and/or procedures, manuals or documents regarding: a) Inspection of the premises by employees or other individuals; b) Discovery of any dangerous condition on Defendant’s premises by employees; c) Correcting of any dangerous conditions on Defendant’s premises by employees; and d) Reporting or documenting of accidents on Defendant’s premises. 19. A true and correct copy of any and all documents provided to the employees of the Defendant who were on duty on the date of the subject accident, explaining maintenance, cleaning, inspection, and safety precautions at Defendant's premises. 20. A true and correct copy of any and all written complaints or documents showing claims or complaints made as to employees and/or customers falling or slipping on substances on Defendant's premises within the last two (2) years in a manner substantially similar to that alleged in the Complaint. 21. Meeting minutes for any safety, committee, or other meetings in which the foreign substances on the floor at the subject premises was discussed for three years before the subject incident. 22. All correspondence (e-mail, letters, text messages, etc.) regarding the foreign substances and/or potential safety concerns the foreign substances on the floor of the subject premises. 23. List of other slip or falls on the flooring of the subject premises for the three (3) year period prior to the subject incident. 24. All personnel files for any employees with knowledge of the subject claim or facts related to the claim and/or incident investigation/reporting and/or store security system. This request is not intended to disclose any confidential and/or private information and should exclude any and all social security numbers, payment information, protected health information and 8 personal addresses. This request only asks for all training documentation, disciplinary information, and job applications or resumes contained within the requested personnel files. 25. A layout of all active surveillance/security/CCTV cameras for the subject area within the premises. 26. A true and correct copy of any and all photographs taken of the accident scene. 27. Any and all video images that depict the events alleged in the complaint. 28. Any and all video images of Plaintiff. 29. Any and all video images of the incident. 30. Any and all video images of the scene where the incident occurred for the period of time beginning 60 minutes before the incident and ending 60 minutes after the incident. 9 CASE NO. 2019-CA-001939-ON WHEREFORE, Defendant, CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC, respectfully requests that this Court enter a Protective Order with regards to the foregoing and any other relief the Court deems just and proper. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy hereof has been electronically served via Florida ePortal to: Manuel Stefan, Esquire, mstefan@forthepeople.com, cvictor@forthepeople.com; on this 21st day of August, 2023. /s/ Melissa T. Woodward Melissa T. Woodward, Esquire Florida Bar No. 022143 WICKER SMITH O'HARA MCCOY & FORD, P.A. Attorneys for Cheddar's Casual Café, Inc. 390 N. Orange Ave., Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 Phone: (407) 843-3939 Fax: (407) 649-8118 ORLcrtpleadings@wickersmith.com -4- EXHIBIT A Filing # 132932583 E-Filed 08/18/2021 01:51:35 PM 92358-5/mtw/12465972 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA ZASKIA MERCADO, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 19CA1939-ON vs. CHEDDAR'S CASUAL CAFÉ, INC., Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY THIS MATTER came on for consideration/hearing on August 17, 2021, on the above motion, and the Court having reviewed the pleadings, having heard argument of counsel, and being duly advised in the premises, states it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate Plaintiff’s Request to Depose Defendant’s Corporate Representative in the above referenced case and in the case styled Zulay Piedrahita v. Cheddars Casual Café, Case No. 19-CA-01012 ON, also currently venued in Osceola County, is GRANTED IN PART. The deposition of Defendant’s designated Corporate Representative for both referenced lawsuits shall take place on the same day. Plaintiff is only permitted to ask Defendant’s Corporate Representative questions regarding his background, i.e. education, pre -Darden job experience and current Darden employment experience, including but not limited to, training, policies and protocols only once. Duplicative questions concerning these topics shall not be permitted in the second corporate representative deposition to take place the same date. DONE AND ORDERED at Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida, this ______ day of __________________, 2021. Honorable Robert J. Egan COPIES FURNISHED TO: Manuel Stefan, Esquire Kurt M. Spengler, Esquire Morgan & Morgan, P.A. Melissa T. Woodward, Esquire Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 198 Broadway Avenue WICKER SMITH O'HARA McCOY & FORD, P.A. Kissimmee, FL 34741 390 N. Orange Ave., Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 EXHIBIT B CASE NO. 19CA1939-ON mstefan@forthepeople.com, OrlCrtPleadings@wickersmith.com cvictor@forthepeople.com, ahiramarmoreno@forthepeople.com Mercado, Zaskia v. Cheddar's Casual Café, Inc. Case No.: 19CA1939-ON Order Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate Page 2 of 1 * <4 @8E647B% / C?4F% ,)#5$#/$ *- 74G83 B6GB58E *2% +)++ *. E8CBEG8E3 A4B@< 6;BH?4:; */ C?4683 4?? C4EG<8F 4CC84E87 I<4 I<78B6BA98E8A68 *0 *1 *2 +) +* ++ EXHIBIT C +, +- +. +,101/ 5USSRV =SVOTQ *)&*2&+)++ CNPO + - / , 9HH=9J9F;=K , KLAHMD9LAGF - - . GF :=@9D> G> L@= HD9AFLA>>' Q9KCA9 E=J;9) KfWXS`' =ecg[dW / .+%T&%1& fS]W` dW_afW^k a` NWV`WeVSk fZW ,4fZ VSk aX 0 EadYS` # EadYS`' H)9) 0 GUfaTWd -+-- Sf Sbbdaj[_SfW^k ,+5+4 S)_)6 eS[V 1 //40 KagfZ KW_adS` :ag^WhSdV 1 VWbae[f[a` iSe fS]W` bgdegS`f fa Jg^W ,).0+ S`V ,)/,+%U& 2 Gd^S`Va' >^ad[VS .-3-- 2 aX fZW >^ad[VS Jg^We aX ;[h[^ HdaUWVgdW) Af [e SYdWWV 3 LW^WbZa`W Fa)5 %/+2& /0-(143- 3 fZSf FSa_[ ;Zag^SYZ' TW[`Y S FafSdk HgT^[U S`V ;agdf 4 >SUe[_[^W Fa)5 %/+2& 02-(+,-/ 4 JWbadfWd Xad fZW KfSfW aX >^ad[VS' _Sk eiWSd fZW i[f`Wee ,+ =(_S[^5 _efWXS`8XadfZWbWab^W)Ua_ ,+ S`V fZSf fZW dWSV[`Y S`V e[Y`[`Y aX fZW Ua_b^WfWV ,, %9bbWSdWV h[S h[VWaUa`XWdW`UW& ,, fdS`eUd[bf Tk fZW i[f`Wee [e `af iS[hWV) ,- ,- ,. GF :=@9D> G> L@= <=>=F<9FL' ;@=<<9J$K ,. ;9KM9D ;9>=' AF;)5 ,/ ,/ EW^[eeS L) NaaViSdV' =ecg[dW ,0 ,0 N[U]Wd K_[fZ G$@SdS EU;ak # >adV' H)9) ,1 ,1 .4+ FadfZ GdS`YW 9hW`gW ,2 ,2 Kg[fW ,+++ ,3 ,3 Gd^S`Va' >^ad[VS .-3+, ,4 ,4 LW^WbZa`W Fa)5 %/+2& .,2(-+,/ -+ -+ >SUe[_[^W Fa)5 %/+2& 1/4(3,,3 -, -, =(_S[^5 _iaaViSdV8i[U]Wde_[fZ)Ua_ -- -- %9bbWSdWV h[S h[VWaUa`XWdW`UW& -. -. -/ -/ -0 -0 . 0 , AF<=O , HJG;==9F 1 / kag$dW SffW`V[`Y' S`V ^aUSf[a`7 0 0 EJ) KL=>9F5 ES``k KfWXS` a` TWZS^X aX fZW 1 =O@A:ALK 1 b^S[`f[XX SffW`V[`Y h[S Qaa_ Xda_ Gd^S`Va' >^ad[VS) 2 %Fa`W _Sd]WV& 2 EK) NGG9F5 NW^^' TafZ b^S[`f[XXe fZSf A ,, ,, dWbdWeW`f faVSk iag^V TW QSe][S EWdUSVa' ;SeW `g_TWd ,- ,- ,4( ;9(,4.4' S`V Qg^Sk H[WVdSZ[fS' iZ[UZ [e ;SeW ,. ,. `g_TWd ,4( ,/ ,/ ;9(,+,-) ,0 ,0 EK) NGG9F5 LZSf [e _k [`fW`f[a`) -- -- ;GMJL J=HGJL=J5 G]Sk) -. -. EK) NGG9F5 PWSZ' A YgWee' [X fZSf$e Z[_) 2 9 ;addWUf) 3 ;GMJL J=HGJL=J5 9F5 ,4 EJ) KL=>9F5 LZ[e [e \gef YW`WdS^ [`Xad_Sf[a` -+ I KfSfW kagd `S_W Xad fZW dWUadV) -+ Se S UadbadSfW dWbdWeW`fSf[hW aX ;ZWVVSd$e) A fZ[`] -, 9 BaeWbZ :daa]e) -, A ZShW fZW d[YZf fa Va fZSf) -- I ;ag^V kag ebW^^ kagd X[def S`V ^Sef `S_W7 -- EK) NGG[def S`V XadW_aef' / Z[_ (( iZWdW (( iZSf kag$dW Se][`Y STagf bd[ad 0 S`eiWd S^^ fZW cgWef[a`e agf ^agV6 XS[d W`agYZ7 0 ^Sieg[fe XS^^e g`VWd) 1 9 G]Sk) 1 EJ) KL=>9F5 A _WS`' [f (( fZ[e [e WjSUf^k iZSf 2 I 9^^ d[YZf) NW$dW aXX fa S YaaV efSdf) 9^ea' 2 ZW VaWe) @W$e S UadbadSfW dWbdWeW`fSf[hW) A$V ^[]W 3 [X kag Va `af g`VWdefS`V S cgWef[a`' b^WSeW Se] _W fa 3 fa ]`ai iZW` ZW fWef[X[WV S`V Se fa iZa ZW fWef[X[WV 4 U^Sd[Xk fZW cgWef[a` ad _SkTW A \gef Se]WV S TSV 4 STagf) LZSf [e fZW W`f[dW (( ,+ cgWef[a` S`V A US` dWiadV [f' Va iZSfWhWd iW `WWV fa) ,+ EK) NGG9F5 (( USbSU[fk fZSf ZW$e ZWdW fa ,- fZSf _WS`e kag g`VWdefaaV [f6 XS[d W`agYZ7 ,- eWdhW [`) ,. 9 PWe) ,. EK) NGG9F5 G]Sk) M`VWd iZSf TSe[e7 -- VWbae[f[a` TWXadW7 -- EK) NGG9F5 Af SUfgS^^k [e) =jZ[T[f 9 (( +,101/ 5USSRV =SVOTQ *)&*2&+)++ CNPO *) ,+ ,- , EK) NGG9F5 G]Sk) ;ag^V kag (( X[def aX S^^' - EJ) KL=>9F5 (( Xad QSe][S EWdUSVa (( Za^V a`' - A V[V`$f Se] STagf bd[ad ^Sieg[fe' A Se]WV STagf . ^Wf _W YWf [f a` fZW dWUadV (( =jZ[T[f 9 (( . bd[ad VWbae[f[a`e S`V A ZShW`$f bdWeg_WV ad Seeg_WV / EK) NGG9F5 (( Xad QSe][S EWdUSVa' A Va`$f eWW 0 ^aa] Sf fZW adVWd fZSf iSe VSfWV Bg`W ,.' -+--' 1 S`k adVWd fZSf eSke A US`$f Se] S`kfZ[`Y STagf 1 UaddWUf7 2 =jZ[T[f 9 a` QSe][S EWdUSVa) 2 EK) NGG9F5 G]Sk) EW^[eeS' fZ[e [e STagf ,. ;agdf) ,/ bd[ad VWbae[f[a`e ZW$e Y[hW`) A Va`$f ]`ai [X fZWk ,/ EJ) KL=>9F5 LZW dWS^[fk [e A Va`$f eWW Zai ZW ,0 iWdW STagf ^Sieg[fe ad iZSf kWf TWUSgeW ZW ZSe`$f ,0 US`$f S`eiWd fZSf) A _WS`' ZW (( [f (( iW Se]WV Xad ,1 Y[hW` _W S`k [`Xad_Sf[a`) 9e fa dW^Sf[a` fa =jZ[T[f ,1 [f [` ZWdW S`V [f eSke [` =jZ[T[f 9) ,2 9 g`VWd QSe][S EWdUSVa' fZWdW [e`$f S` adVWd fZSf ,2 EK) NGG9F5 A i[^^' Tgf A$V ^[]W fa ]`ai fZW -, [e ^[efWV [` =jZ[T[f 9 Xad QSe][S EWdUSVa) AX kag -, TSe[e' S`V ea A US` YWf [f a` fZW dWUadV iZSf kagd -- US` bdah[VW _W S`kfZ[`Y afZWdi[eW' A$V ^[]W fa ^aa] -- TSe[e [e fZSf kag SdW `af S^^ai[`Y Z[_ fa S`eiWd -. Sf [f) -. STagf bd[ad [`U[VW`fe) -/ EK) NGG9F5 A \gef Se]WV STagf fZW 3 fab[U) LZSf [e [f) LZS`] kag) 4 VWbae[f[a`e) 4 EJ) KL=>9F5 G]Sk) A ef[^^ Va`$f g`VWdefS`V) ,+ EK) NGG9F5 A V[V`$f Se] STagf bd[ad ,, EK) NGG9F5 NZSf (( iW$hW S^dWSVk Ya`W ahWd ,1 EK) NGG9F5 A (( fa TW Za`Wef i[fZ kag' A -+ [`V[USf[a` [` kagd (( S`V kag$dW Seeg_[`Y fZSf fZW -+ Va`$f g`VWdefS`V iZSf (( iZWdW fZWdW [e S` aT\WUf[a` -, ^Sieg[fe fZSf ZW$e TWW` (( bdWh[age^k ZSe TWW` S -, fa _W Se][`Y STagf bd[ad VWbae[f[a`e) -- UadbadSfW dWb VWS^e i[fZ e^[b(S`V(XS^^e' Tgf fZW -- EK) NGG9F5 LZSf$e \gef YW`WdS^ [`Xad_Sf[a`) +,101/ 5USSRV =SVOTQ *)&*2&+)++ CNPO *- ,/ ,1 , @W$e fWef[Xk[`Y (( , kWSde bd[ad fa fZW bdWeW`f _SffWd [` S _S``Wd - EK) NGG9F5 1 fZSf$e [f) 1 I Ka A$_ Ya[`Y fa Se] kag SYS[`' Ed) :daa]e5 2 :P EJ) KL=>9F5 2 NWdW fZW fia bdWh[age fWef[_a`[We Xad ^Sieg[fe dWYSdV[`Y 3 I G]Sk) Ed) :daa]e' iW eW`f S `af[UW [` fZ[e 3 XadW[Y` fdS`e[fadk egTefS`UWe ad egTefS`UWe a` fZW X^aad 4 USeW [` iZ[UZ fZWdW$e S` =jZ[T[f 9 S`V =jZ[T[f : Se fa 4 Sf ;ZWVVSd$e7 ,+ dg^[`Ye fZSf iWdW _SVW S`V kag SdW ZWdW fa fWef[Xk [` ,+ EK) NGGad fZW dW_S[`VWd aX fZ[e VWbae[f[a`' A$^^ ,/ EJ) KL=>9F5 G]Sk) 9`V [` fZSf adVWd' A iag^V ,0 US^^ [f ;ZWVVSd$e6 [e fZSf a]Sk i[fZ kag7 ,0 SYdWW i[fZ kag fZSf fZWdW SdW `g_Wd[US^ [fW_e fZSf ,1 9 PWe) ,1 iWdW agf^[`WV' ebWU[X[US^^k `g_TWd -+' -1' --' -2' ,2 I G]Sk) @ShW kag WhWd eWdhWV Se S UadbadSfW ,2 S`V -3' aX S^^ iZ[UZ fZ[e adVWd dW^SfWe fa WhWdk ,3 dWbdWeW`fSf[hW Xad ;ZWVVSd$e TWXadW7 ,3 e[`Y^W a`W a` HSdSYdSbZe ,' -' .' S`V /' S^^ ,4 EK) NGG9F5 Fa' A$_ Se][`Y kag fZSf cgWef[a`) 0 cgWef[a` TW[`Y Se]WV) Pag _Sk US^^ fZW ;agdf Xad S 0 EK) NGG9F5 9^^ d[YZf) A Va`$f g`VWdefS`V 2 EJ) KL=>9F5 Pag$dW [`efdgUf[`Y Z[_ `af fa (( 3 kagd aT\WUf[a`' EW^[eeS) 3 EK) NGG9F5 G]Sk) A fZ[`] A$_ Ya[`Y fa ZShW ,- :P EJ) KL=>9F5 ,- fa Va fZSf) ,. I 9^^ d[YZf) DWf _W Se] kag fZ[e) A` fZaeW fia ,. EK) NGG9F5 A$^^ egebW`V fZW VWbae[f[a` S`V A ,0 Ua`UWd`WV egTefS`UWe a` fZW X^aad7 ,0 i[^^ YWf U^Sd[fk Xda_ fZW ;agdf) Ed) :daa]e' A (( ,1 EK) NGG9F5 NZk7 ,3 EJ) KL=>9F5 (( ,4 EK) NGG9F5 A ZShW fa) Pag Va`$f (( -- L@= NALF=KK5 GZ' a]Sk) -- EK) NGG9F5 Fg_TWd --' =jZ[T[f 9' QSe][S -. EJ) KL=>9F5 (( ZShW S` adVWd' EW^[eeS) -/ EWdUSVa' ">SUfe dW^SfWV fa S`k [`V[h[VgS^ XS^^[`Y ad -/ EK) NGG9F5 A i[^^) A i[^^ `WWV [f) 1 VWbae[f[a` S`V fa S^^ai kag fa Se] S`k cgWef[a`e 1 EK) NGG9F5 G]Sk) A i[^^ efSfW a` fZW dWUadV ,, bda_[eWV fZW Vd[hWd$e ^[UW`eW aX Ed) :daa]e7 ,- Ed) :daa]e iSe [`efdgUfWV `af fa S`eiWd g`VWd ,- ;GMJL J=HGJL=J5 PWe) Nag^V kag ^[]W fa dWSV ,. =jZ[T[f 9 aX QSe][S EWdUSVa' iZ[UZ [e `af (( fZWdW ,. fZW VWba' Se iW^^7 ,/ [e `a dg^[`Y Se fa fZSf =jZ[T[f 9 [` S`k adVWd) LZW ,/ EK) NGGA;9L= G> G9L@ - `a adVWd fZSf bdaZ[T[fe Z[_ Xda_ S`eiWd[`Y [`cg[d[We - . STagf =jZ[T[f 9 g`VWd QSe][S EWdUSVa) 9`V . KL9L= G> >DGJA<9 / g`Xadfg`SfW^k' A US`$f VWbaeW Z[_ Xad a`W S`V `af / ;GMFLP G> GJ9F?= 0 fZW afZWd TWUSgeW aX S ;agdf adVWd) 0 1 EK) NGGad fZW ;agdf (( Xad fZW 1 A' fZW g`VWde[Y`WV' UWdf[Xk fZSf fZW i[f`Wee [` fZW 2 dWUadV (( 2 XadWYa[`Y fdS`eUd[bf bWdea`S^^k SbbWSdWV TWXadW _W S`V 3 EJ) KL=>9F5 9F5 PWSZ' A \gef (( ,1 F9GEA ;@GMD9?@ ,2 EK) NGG^ad[VS ,4 kagd V[dWUf[a`)