Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment in California

On January 27, 2021, the Court entered the Sister-State Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant. Defendant filed its Motion to Vacate Entry of Sister-State Judgment, asserting that entry of the Sister-State Judgment should be vacated because Defendant was not served with the summons and complaint in the Arizona Action. Defendant filed a near identical motion in the Arizona court.

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT (CCP § 1710.40) TENTATIVE RULING: Betty Fisher’s Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment is GRANTED.

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT (CCP § 1710.40) TENTATIVE RULING: Betty Fisher’s Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment is GRANTED.

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT (CCP § 1710.40) TENTATIVE RULING: Betty Fisher’s Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment is GRANTED. The sister-state judgment is hereby VACATED. If applicants Bessie Huckabee, Kay Passailaigue Slade, Sandra Byrd, and Peter Kouten have proof of an actual judgment against Ms. Fisher, they may re-file an application for entry of judgment on sister-state judgment.

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds Judgment Debtor has not demonstrated a basis to vacate or modify the entry of sister-state judgment. Judgment Debtor’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is DENIED.Judgment Creditor to give notice.

Defendant seeks to vacate the sister-state judgment under CCP §§ 473(d) or 473.5, but neither is a proper authority to vacate the instant judgment. The proper authority to vacate a sister-state judgment is CCP § 1710.40(a), but even then, Defendant may only vacate it based on grounds that are “[c]ommon defenses to enforcement of the sister state judgment” as stated in Traci, supra. Defendant asserts that the original judgment from the State of Arizona is invalid for lack of service of process.

VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT (CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Rhonda Dixon’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is DENIED. ANALYSIS: On January 15, 2020, Judgment Creditor Reed Elsevier, Inc. (“Judgment Creditor”) filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment based on a judgment from Ohio. The Court entered judgment the same day against Judgment Debtor Ronda Dixon (“Judgment Debtor”).

VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT (CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Rhonda Dixon’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is DENIED. ANALYSIS: On January 15, 2020, Judgment Creditor Reed Elsevier, Inc. (“Judgment Creditor”) filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment based on a judgment from Ohio. The Court entered judgment the same day against Judgment Debtor Ronda Dixon (“Judgment Debtor”).

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT (CCP § 1710.40) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Rafael J. Chavez’s Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment is GRANTED. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Vacate sister-state judgment on the grounds that Defendant was taken by surprise by the action. OPPOSITION: None file as of July 9, 2019. ANALYSIS: I. Background On April 10, 2019, Petitioner De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. (“Petitioner”) applied for and obtained an entry of judgment against Respondent Rafael J.

Concours Auto Spa, et al. 20TRCP00181 Councours Auto Spa, et al.’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sister State Judgment TENTATIVE RULING Councours Auto Spa, et al.’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sister State Judgment is denied without prejudice. Background Plaintiff filed the Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment on August 21, 2020. Plaintiff alleges the following facts.

Concours Auto Spa, et al. 20TRCP00181 Councours Auto Spa, et al.’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sister State Judgment TENTATIVE RULING Councours Auto Spa, et al.’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sister State Judgment is denied without prejudice. Background Plaintiff filed the Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment on August 21, 2020.

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT ( CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Nathaniel D. Hayes Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is DENIED. ANALYSIS: On January 16, 2020, Judgment Creditor CitiBank, NA (Judgment Creditor) filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment based on a judgment from Indiana. The Court entered judgment the same day against Judgment Debtor Nathaniel D. Hayes (Judgment Debtor).

California courts have authority to vacate a sister state money judgment on the ground the judgment exceeds the jurisdiction of the sister state court under California’s Sister State Money Judgments Act. (Comment to Code Civ. Proc. Section 1710.40(a).)

The Fourth District Court of Appeal describes the basis for vacating the entry of judgment on a sister state judgment as follows: Under the Sister State and Foreign MoneyJudgments Act, a sister state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment.

The trial courts authority to vacate a sister-state judgment is strictly limited . A judgment entered pursuant to the Act may be vacated only on the grounds set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1710.40, subdivision (a). ( Fishman v. Fishman (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 815, 819820.) That section provides that a sister-state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister-state judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1710.40(a).)

Motion To Vacate Defendant Flora Waters AKA Jean Threats’ Motion To Vacate Sister- CVPS2306172 WATERS vs WATERS State Judgment; Additionally/Alternatively, Motion To Stay Sister-State Judgment Enforcement Tentative Ruling: The Motion of Defendant Flora Waters, aka Jean Threats to Vacate Sister State Judgment is GRANTED. There is no sister state “judgment”.

Defendants concede in their reply that the Georgia court recently denied their motion to set aside and vacate the Georgia judgment but note that they have now filed an appeal of that ruling. Code of Civil Procedure Section 1710.40(a) provides that a sister-state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister-state judgment . . . .

Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment Based on Sister-State Judgment Pursuant to CCP § 1710.15 and § 1710.20, judgment creditor may apply for the entry of a judgment based on a sister state judgment by filing an application with the court. Plaintiff filed such application, and the judgment from our sister state of Arizona was entered on July 25, 2017.

Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment Based on Sister-State Judgment Pursuant to CCP § 1710.15 and § 1710.20, judgment creditor may apply for the entry of a judgment based on a sister state judgment by filing an application with the court. Plaintiff filed such application, and the judgment from our sister state of Arizona was entered on July 25, 2017.

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to vacate sister state judgment is denied.

On January 27, 2026, Judgment Creditor On Deck Capital, Inc. (On Deck) filed the case-initiating Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment against Judgment Debtors Wellness Program Services LLC and Jeffrey Taraday. Taraday now moves to vacate the Sister-State Judgment. On Deck filed a request to continue the hearing on the grounds that Taraday never properly served it with the motion and it needs more time to prepare and file an opposition.

As there is no legal basis for Defendants request to vacate the entry of sister-state judgment, the Motion is denied. Conclusion Defendants Mighty Torrente and Cecilia Torrentes Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff to give notice.

Defendant therefore moves to vacate this Court’s judgment. A motion to vacate a sister-state judgment is governed by CCP § 1710.40, which provides: (a) A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.

Defendants motion to vacate sister state judgment is denied. Moving party to give notice.

Before the court is the motion to vacate sister-state judgment filed on May 1, 2026, by defendant and judgment debtor Gladys Haller (Gladys). As more fully set forth below, the motion is DENIED. By this motion, Gladys seeks to vacate the sister-state judgment this court entered in favor of plaintiff and judgment creditor David Haller (David) on October 20, 2025. The sister-state judgment is based on a Virginia judgment entered on or about June 6, 2025.

Case Number: 22STCP03778 Hearing Date: March 13, 2023 Dept: 26 Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc. v. Irvin, et al. MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT ( CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Frederick Irvins Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is GRANTED. THE JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THIS COURT ON OCTOBER 14, 2022 IS VACATED. ANALYSIS: On October 14, 2022, Judgment Creditor Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.

LAW AND ANALYSIS This case concerns the enforcement of a sister state judgment granted to Jason Hawkins (Hawkins) as against Joseph Patrick Kelly (Kelly). The sister state judgment is based on an Oregon default judgment obtained in 2021 against Kelly in the amount of $10,000. Kelly moves to vacate the sister state judgment on grounds that the Oregon court rendered the judgment in excess of its jurisdiction.

The sister state judgment may be filed with a California court, and a judgment may immediately entered thereon subject generally to a 30-day stay after service of notice of entry on the judgment debtor. (Id., see CCP § 1710.45(d).) A sister state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in California on the sister state judgment. (CCP § 1710.40(a).) This motion must be made within 30 days after service of notice of entry of judgment pursuant to Section 1710.30.

California courts have authority to vacate a sister state money judgment on the ground the judgment exceeds the jurisdiction of the sister state court under California’s Sister State Money Judgments Act. (Comment to Code Civ. Proc. Section 1710.40(a).) Discussion Movant Joshua Singer moves to vacate default judgment on grounds that the New York Supreme Court, County of Westchester, which granted default judgment against him on August 16, 2017 in the action 2 Cooper Square LLC v.

Agege’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is DENIED. On December 5, 2016, the Court entered a sister state judgment from the State of Louisiana in favor of Plaintiff Charles H. Coates, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendant Charles O. Agege (“Defendant”). On May 22, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment (the “Motion”). On June 13, 2018, Plaintiff filed an untimely opposition.

Here, Defendant moves to vacate the default judgment entered on sister-state judgment arguing that the sister-state judgment was procured without personal jurisdiction.

The Defendants Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment is DENIED

Her motion to vacate the sister-state judgment on the ground that the interest calculation is incorrect is therefore denied. Judgment Debtor also moves to vacate the sister-state judgment on the ground that a New York judgment from a third party against this same judgment creditor was assigned to Judgment Debtor, and she seeks to have that judgment offset against the sister-state judgment entered in this case. Judgment Debtor again cites no case law to support her argument.

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT FILED BY MANOJ TRIPATHI, SADHANA TRIPATHI * TENTATIVE RULING: * Before the Court is a motion to vacate a Sister-State Judgment (“motion to vacate”). The motion to vacate is brought by Defendant Manoj Tripathi and Defendant Sadhana Tripathi (collectively “Defendants”). The motion to vacate is directed towards a Sister-State Judgment confirmed by this Court on March 16, 2016.

HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT FILED BY DAVID M. DONOVAN * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendant David Donovan moves to vacate a sister state judgment. Mr. Donovan states in his declaration that he was never served in the Arizona case in which the out-of-state judgment was entered. He also asserts a number of defenses to the underlying merit of the Arizona action.

DEF Bassem E El Mallakh Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Judgment Defendant Bassem Essam El Mallakh’s Motion to Set Aside and Vacate Entry of a Sister-State Judgment and to Vacate the Abstract Judgment and Writ of Execution is DENIED. However, pursuant to CCP § 473(d), the Notice and Entry of Sister State Judgment is corrected, nunc pro tunc, as follows: Section 2(b)(3) is corrected to state that the judgment entered in sister state is “February 25, 2020.”

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1710.40, subd. (a).) A motion to vacate a sister state judgment must be made no later 30 days after service of notice of entry of judgment. (Code Civ.

TENTATIVE Judgment Debtor Maria Bothams Motion to Vacate Judgment is DENIED. Judgment Creditor to give notice. DISCUSSION A sister-state judgment entered in California may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1710.40, subd. (a).)

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

“A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP 1710.40(a).

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Judgment On Sister-State Judgment Matter on calendar for Thursday, June 19, 2014, Line 3, DEFENDANT STEPHEN BREATHOUR's Motion To Vacate Judgment On Sister-State Judgment. Off calendar. Pursuant to the stipulation to vacate filed on May 12, 2014, the Court issued an order on May 20, 2014 vacating judgment on the sister-state judgment.

CCP §1710.40(a) provides that a judgment debtor may move to vacate the judgment under the Sister State Money-Judgments Act based on any ground that would be a defense to an action in California on the sister state judgment, including the ground that interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment is incorrect. Code Civ. Proc, § 1710.40 provides the M method by which a defendant may challenge the entry of a sister state judgment. (Fidelity Creditor Service, ‘Inc. v.

Petitioner seeks entry of judgment on sister-state judgment in this state through this petition for a debt owed by Respondents in the State of New York, County of Ontario. Petition was filed on March 10, 2021. The Judgment of the sister state was entered in favor of Petitioner on June 20, 2019, in the total amount of $153,730.72 ($132,769.23 + $20, 526.49 + $435). On March 10, 2021, Respondents filed a motion to vacate the sister-state judgment.

Petitioner seeks entry of judgment on sister-state judgment in this state through this petition for a debt owed by Respondents in the State of New York, County of Ontario. Petition was filed on March 10, 2021. The Judgment of the sister state was entered in favor of Petitioner on June 20, 2019, in the total amount of $153,730.72 ($132,769.23 + $20, 526.49 + $435). On March 10, 2021, Respondents filed a motion to vacate the sister-state judgment.

It is untimely. [5] Accordingly, the court DENIES Shaws motion to vacate the sister state judgment. CONCLUSION: For the foregoing reasons, the Court decides the pending motion as follows: 1. Motion to vacate sister-state judgment is DENIED. Moving party is to give notice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

CCP § 1710.30(a) requires notice of entry of judgment on a sister state judgment to be served in the manner proved for service of summons, i.e. personal service. (CCP §§ 1710.30(a), 415.10.) For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is GRANTED, without prejudice to plaintiff seeking to amend its name in this proceeding.

MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Barbara Trattler’s motion to vacate the sister state judgment is DENIED.

The motion to vacate the sister state judgment and enter an amended notice of entry of sister state judgment is granted. TENTATIVE RULING # 7: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE THE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT AND ENTER AN AMENDED NOTICE OF ENTRY OF SISTER STATE JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS V.

HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT FILED BY GIVV, INC., et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * The motion to vacate or stay, brought collectively by the four named judgment debtors (“Judgment Debtors”), is denied in full. Judgment Debtors’ request for judicial notice is granted. The basis for this ruling is as follows. A. The Nature Of The Agreement. The sister-state judgment at issue is based on the parties’ Secured Merchant Agreement (“Agreement”). (Senn Dec., Exh. “A”.)

VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT (CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Maria Josielyne Dy Angeles’s Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is CONTINUED TO MARCH 25, 2020 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26. ANALYSIS: On June 10, 2019, Judgment Creditor San Tan Heights Homeowners Association (“Judgment Creditor”) filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister State Judgment. The Court entered judgment the same day against Judgment Debtor Maria Josielyne Dy Angeles (“Judgment Debtor”).

Service, not actual notice, triggers the 30-day limit for the judgment debtor to make a motion to vacate the judgment so long as the judgment debtor was effectively served with process in the sister state action. ( Conseco Marketing, LLC, supra , at p. 838.)

On July 6, 2018, the Judgment Based on Sister-State Judgment, pursuant to CCP §1710.25, was entered. On August 10, 2018, Defendant Mary Garcia filed a motion to vacate the sister-state judgment entered against her. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition.

.: 22NWCP00153 HEARING: 07/26/22 JUDGE: OLIVIA ROSALES #3 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendant Jose Vasquezs motion to vacate judgment is DENIED. CCP § 1710.40. Moving Party to give notice. JUDICIAL NOTICE is taken of Plaintiffs exhibits. ( Evid . Code 452.) CCP § 1710.40(a) provides that a judgment entered based on a sister state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment. ( Traci & Marx Co. v.

Section 1710.40(a) states, A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect. (CCP § 1710.40(a).)

Defendant Jonathan Ofalla’s Motion to Vacate Default and Default Judgment (Sister State) is DENIED.

The sister state judgment was entered on September 28, 2021 in the amount of $49,537.54 ("California Sister State Judgment").

Discussion: A sister state money judgment “may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment…” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1710.40, subd. (a).)

Defendant was never served with the application or judgment notice in this action. (Motion at p. 2; Kirsch Decl. ¶¶ 2-3.) On October 13, 2023, Defendant filed a motion to vacate the sister-state judgment. (Defendants request for judicial notice is granted.) Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition. No sister-state judgment may be entered when a judgment has previously been entered in California. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1710.55, 1710.60.)

The Fourth District Court of Appeal describes the basis for vacating the entry of judgment on a sister state judgment as follows: Under the Sister State and Foreign MoneyJudgments Act, a sister state judgment may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment.

Motion for Order Amending Sister-State Judgment and Release of Funds In light of the court’s ruling denying Respondent’s motion to vacate the sister-state judgment, as well as the increase in the amount of the Texas Judgment by $16,000 pursuant to the “triggers” based upon an appeal to the Texas Court of Appeals ($8,000) and the Texas Supreme Court ($8,000), the court grants Petitioner’s motion for order amending the sister-state judgment to increase the amount of the judgment by the same, as well as those

Notice Of Motion To Vacate Sister State Judgment Or In The Alternative Stay Enforcement Pending Determination Of Appeal In Sister State; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And, Or Labor Commission Petition Hearing Set for hearing on Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Line 3, DEFENDANT FERNANDO VENTRESCA'S Motion To Vacate Sister State Judgment Or In The Alternative Stay Enforcement Pending Determination Of Appeal In Sister State; And, Or Labor Commission Petition Hearing.

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Sister State Judgment Or In The Alternative Stay Enforcement Pending Determination Of Appeal In Sister State And Or Labor Commission Petition Hearing Set for hearing on Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Line 4, DEFENDANT GREG SHERRELL'S Motion To Vacate Sister State Judgment Or In The Alternative Stay Enforcement Pending Determination Of Appeal In Sister State And Or Labor Commission Petition Hearing.

WALLERS Case Number: 22CV-0200525 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment: On August 29, 2022 this Court entered Judgment in favor of On Deck Capital, Inc. (judgment creditor) on a Sister State Judgment from the District Court of Utah, in the amount of $97,001.55 (including interest and filing fees) against James Wallers (judgment debtor).

WALLERS Case Number: 22CV-0200525 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment: On August 29, 2022 this Court entered Judgment in favor of On Deck Capital, Inc. (judgment creditor) on a Sister State Judgment from the District Court of Utah, in the amount of $97,001.55 (including interest and filing fees) against James Wallers (judgment debtor).

WALLERS Case Number: 22CV-0200525 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment: On August 29, 2022 this Court entered Judgment in favor of On Deck Capital, Inc. (judgment creditor) on a Sister State Judgment from the District Court of Utah, in the amount of $97,001.55 (including interest and filing fees) against James Wallers (judgment debtor).

WALLERS Case Number: 22CV-0200525 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment: On August 29, 2022 this Court entered Judgment in favor of On Deck Capital, Inc. (judgment creditor) on a Sister State Judgment from the District Court of Utah, in the amount of $97,001.55 (including interest and filing fees) against James Wallers (judgment debtor).

WALLERS Case Number: 22CV-0200525 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment: On August 29, 2022 this Court entered Judgment in favor of On Deck Capital, Inc. (judgment creditor) on a Sister State Judgment from the District Court of Utah, in the amount of $97,001.55 (including interest and filing fees) against James Wallers (judgment debtor).

However, a sister state judgment entered pursuant to the SSFMJA may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment[.] (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1710.40(a)).

ALLEGATIONS: This case concerns the enforcement of a sister state judgment granted to Jason Hawkins (Plaintiff) as against Joseph Patrick Kelly (Defendant). The sister state judgment is based on an Oregon default judgment obtained in 2021 against Defendant. Defendant moves to vacate the sister state judgment on grounds that the Oregon court rendered the judgment in excess of its jurisdiction. ANALYSIS: I.

Service of Notice of Entry of Sister State Judgment and Timeliness of Motion: “Notice of entry of [a sister state] judgment shall be served promptly by the judgment creditor upon the judgment debtor in the manner provided for service of summons by Article 3 (commencing with Section 415.10) of Chapter 4 of Title 5 of Part 2.” CCP § 1710.30(a). The judgment debtor has 30 days from service of the judgment to file a motion to vacate the judgment. Id., CCP § 1710.40(b).

VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT ( CCP §§ 1710.30, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Jeremy Cohens Motion to Vacate Sister State Judgment is CONTINUED TO AUGUST 29, 2023 AT 10:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 OF THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. BY AUGUST 1, 2023, JUDGMENT DEBTOR IS TO SERVE THE MOVING PAPERS AND NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE ON JUDGMENT CREDITOR AND FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE SAME WITH THE COURT. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE MOTION BEING DENIED .

Here, the judgment is not unconditional at this time, thus, the court grants the motion to vacate the sister state judgment.

Here, the judgment is not unconditional at this time, thus, the court grants the motion to vacate the sister state judgment.

Here, the judgment is not unconditional at this time, thus, the court grants the motion to vacate the sister state judgment.

USA, Inc. d/b/a CCAP Auto Lease Ltd. filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment (“Application”).

Defendant Harold Kosner’s motion to vacate sister state judgment is GRANTED. Background This is a sister state judgment action. A judgment in favor of Plaintiff Illinois Institute of Technology was granted and entered in Illinois on November 18, 2004, and was “revived” on November 10, 2015. This Court entered sister state judgment on October 25, 2016.

Based on the foregoing, Thorne has demonstrated that the Utah court lacked personal jurisdiction over him and the sister-state judgment it rendered is void. The motion to vacate the sister-state judgment is granted. Court clerk to give notice.

Under CCP section 1710.25, when party applies for the entry of a judgment in California based on a judgment in another state, the clerk must enter a judgment for the total of the amount remaining under the sister state judgment, the interest accrued on the sister state judgment, and the fees for filing the application for entry of the sister statement judgment.

Under CCP section 1710.25, when party applies for the entry of a judgment in California based on a judgment in another state, the clerk must enter a judgment for the total of the amount remaining under the sister state judgment, the interest accrued on the sister state judgment, and the fees for filing the application for entry of the sister statement judgment.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Amend Judgment; Motion Vacate Judgment CASE: Red Boots Investments, L.P. v. Karen Rogers, Case No. 18CV00826 (Judge Sterne) HEARING DATE: May 14, 2018 MATTER: Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Judgment on Sister-State Judgment or, in the Alternative, Stay Enforcement of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment; Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment on Sister-State Judgment ATTORNEYS: Bruce W. Hogan for Plaintiff Red Boots Investments, L.P.

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE — JOINT MOTION TO VACATE ENTRY OF SISTER—STATE JUDGMENT [RESP] LADAN, INC, [RESP] MAGID NAZARI RULlNG The unopposed motion to vacate entry of sister-state judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1710.40(a) by defendants Ladan, Inc. and Magid Nazari (“Defendants”) is GRANTED.

.: ES022509 Hearing Date: December 21, 2018 (continued from November 9, 2018) [TENTATIVE] order RE: MOTION TO VACATE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT BACKGROUND On July 6, 2018, Plaintiff Cristopher McMurry (“Plaintiff”) filed an Application for Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment, naming him as the Judgment Creditor, c/o Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP. Defendants/Judgment Debtors are identified as Adult Day Health Centers of America, Inc., Larry Garcia, and Mary Garcia.

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Judgemtn On Sister-State Judgment (Ccp 1710.40) Set for hearing on Friday, September 17, 2010, line 8, DEFENDANT PETER LYNCH'S Motion To Vacate Judgment On Sister-State Judgment (CCP 1710.40). MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT DENIED. DEFENDANT WAS PROPERLY SERVED AND IMPLIEDLY WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO ARBITRATION. DEFENDANT FAILS TO SHOW THAT THE JUDGMENT EXCEEDED ANY RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE PLEADINGS. =(302/CWW)

Defendants seek to vacate the sister-state judgment pursuant to CCP § 1710.40(a): “[a] judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.”

DEF Senior Classic Leasing, LLC Motion to Vacate The motion by Senior Classic Leasing, LLC, to vacate sister state judgment, is granted. A judgment entered under the Sister State Money-Judgments Act (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1710.10 et seq.) “may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment[.]” Code Civ. Proc. § 1710.40(a). Under California law and the full faith and credit clause (U.S. Const., art.

Case Number: 23PSCP00526 Hearing Date: May 15, 2024 Dept: G Defendant Statney Lattin Jr.s Motion to Vacate Judgment on Sister-State Judgment Respondent: Plaintiff Grand Capital TENTATIVE RULING Defendant Statney Lattin Jr.s Motion to Vacate Judgment on Sister-State Judgment is DENIED. BACKGROUND On December 4, 2023, Plaintiff Grand Capital filed an application for entry of judgment on sister-state judgment against Defendants People Onesource Inc.

California courts have authority to vacate a sister state money judgment on the ground the judgment exceeds the jurisdiction of the sister state court under California’s Sister State Money Judgments Act. (Comment to Code Civ. Proc. Section 1710.40(a).) Discussion Movant Joshua Singer moves to vacate default judgment on grounds that the New York Supreme Court, County of Westchester, which granted default judgment against him on August 16, 2017 in the action 2 Cooper Square LLC v.

Conclusion Judgment Debtor Jacob Steins Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment is DENIED. Court clerk to give notice.

Byeon (Byeon), pursuant to a sister-state judgment obtained in New York. On July 15, 2025, the clerk of this court entered judgment based on the sister-state judgment in Samsons favor and against judgment debtors. On the same day, Byeon was served with notice of the entry of judgment. On August 14, 2025, Byeon filed this motion to vacate judgment on sister-state judgment. On January 21, 2026, Samson filed an opposition. II.

· Defendants were not served and did not get due process before entry of the default judgment. No opposition or reply has been filed. II. ANALYSIS A. Legal Standard Pending determinations on motions to vacate made under the California statute, courts must stay enforcement of sister-state judgments. Code Civ. Proc., §1710.50(a)(3). Grounds for staying enforcement of sister-state judgment include an appeal pending in the sister-state (Code Civ.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1710.40, subdivisions (a) and (b), allows a judgment debtor to make a noticed motion to vacate the entry of judgment on a sister state judgment on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment [n]ot later than 30 days after service of notice of entry of judgment. Plaintiff Ideal Media US Inc.

(19PSCP00497) ______________________________________________________________________________ [Judgment Debtors] Jackymoon Corp.’s and Tony Hsu’s MOTION TO VACATE NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ON SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT BASED ON SISTER-STATE JUDGMENT Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 6/4/21, 5:07 p.m.; due 4/21/21) Tentative Ruling Judgment Debtors Jackymoon Corp.’s and Tony Hsu’s Motion to Vacate Notice of Entry of Judgment on Sister-State Judgment

Defendants seek to vacate the sister-state judgment pursuant to CCP § 1710.40(a), which states, “[a] judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment....”