Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in California

Levy filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant XL Specialty Insurance Company. On January 10, 2023, Leslie S. Ahari filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant XL Specialty Insurance Company. On January 11, 2023, Scott N. Godes filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiffs DigitalBridge Group, Inc.

(Delta Application for Pro Hac Vice of Kathryn Grace, Grace Dec., ¶¶2-14.) Delta and Grace satisfy the requirements for pro hac vice admission. Deltas Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Kathryn Grace is granted. Plaintiffs Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Adam S.

1.Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 2.Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 3.Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 4.Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 5.Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice The pro hac vice applications of Adam Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason Dennett, Kim Stephens, and Paul Peel are granted.

Each Counsel Applicant has individually provided proof that the $50.00 fee required to be admitted pro hac vice has been paid to the State Bar of California and that the State Bar has been served with the Application. CONCLUSION: The Court GRANTS Harry Sandicks Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court GRANTS Julie Simeones Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court GRANTS Chirag Patels Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice.

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Howard McPherson 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John T. O’Connell Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (John O’ Connell): The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice, brought on behalf of John T. O’Connell is CONTINUED to November 13, 2020. The Court requests a Supplemental Declaration from Mr. O’Connell, which identifies any applications to appear pro hac vice, within the last 2 years.

*TENTATIVE RULING:* The application for admission pro hac vice is approved.

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Defendant Woodard; Order admitting John M. Kelly, Esq. to appear as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant Woodward, Inc. Defendant Woodward, Inc.’s Application to Appoint Attorney John M. Kelly, Esq. as counsel pro hac vice is GRANTED. Defendant has met the requirements of CRC, Rule 9.40. (See Declaration of Kelly, ¶¶ 2-9, Exh. A.) Moving Attorney to give Notice. 3. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Defendant Woodard; Order admitting Gina M.

The Court finds/orders: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) Verified Application by Matthew J Ruza for Approval to Appear Pro Hac Vice continued to 12/08/2022 at 08:20 AM in department 21. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) Verified Application by John A Ybarra for Approval to Appear Pro Hac Vice continued to 12/08/2022 at 08:20 AM in department 21.

[tentative] Order RE: (1) amended application of attorney wayne l. robbins, jr. to appear as counsel pro hac vice (2) amended application of attorney victoria l. rhodes to appear as counsel pro hac vice MOVING PARTY: Wayne L. Robbins, Jr. RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed (1) Amended Application of Wayne L. Robbins, Jr. to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Victoria L.

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice – Howard G. McPherson 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice – John T. O’Connell Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice: The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice, brought on behalf of John T. O’Connell is GRANTED, as the subject Application fully complies with CRC 9.40. Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice: The Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice, brought on behalf of Howard G. McPherson is GRANTED, as the subject Application fully complies with CRC 9.40.

Katz to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice ; (2) Verified Application of Peter M. Sartorius to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice ; (3) Verified Application of Sahand Farahati to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice ; and (4) Verified Application of Joseph B. Weiner to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice . No oppositions or other responses have been filed to any of the Applications.

Conditioned upon the payment of the $500 pro hac vice fee, the application of Attorney Thomas A. Brown II to appear pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Paul Falzone is GRANTED.

Stadco LA, LLC, et al. 20STCV29265 Karla Becerra, et al.’s Application for Admission of Jorge Mares as Counsel Pro Hac Vice Karla Becerra, et al.’s Application for Admission of Rebecca Page as Counsel Pro Hac Vice Karla Becerra, et al.’s Application for Admission of Frank Guerra, IV, as Counsel Pro Hac Vice Karla Becerra, et al.’s Application for Admission of Miguel Salazar, as Counsel Pro Hac Vice Karla Becerra, et al.’s Application for Admission of Mikal White, as Counsel Pro Hac Vice

[Tentative] Order RE: (1) application of kevin a. fritz to appear as counsel pro hac vice (2) application of jeffrey p. weingart to appear as counsel pro hac vice (3) application of mitchell schuster to appear as counsel pro hac vice MOVING PARTY: Applicant Kevin A. Fritz RESPONDING PARTY: n/a (1) Application of Kevin A. Fritz to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Applicant Jeffrey P.

MONSANTO COMPANY ET AL EVENTS: (1) Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Jordan Walker) (2) Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Kari Sutherland) (3) Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Lee Mickus) (4) Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Jay Schuttert) (5) Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (James Craig Orr, Jr.) The applications to be admitted pro hac vice are granted.

The Court finds/orders: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) of David J Cutshaw for Pro Hac Vice Admission continued to 06/16/2022 at 08:20 AM in department 43. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) Verified Unopposed Application of Barry D Rooth for Pro Hac Vice Admission continued to 06/16/2022 at 08:20 AM in department 43.

OMahoney to appear pro hac vice in this action. RULING : The application is granted. The application of Tara C. OMahoney filed and served on 2/20/25 to appear pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Bolliger & Mabillard Consulting Engineers, Inc. in this action meets the requirements of CRC 9.40. Dept. F47 Date: 3/25/25 Case #24CHCV02702 APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Application filed on 2/20/25.

This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noël Wise Defendants' Application for Christina Pyle Engle to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is DENIED. According to Ms. Engle's declaration, she has been admitted as counsel pro hac vice in two other cases since November 19, 2020, with another application for pro hac vice admission pending in a third case. Absent special circumstances, repeated pro hac vice appearances by any attorney is grounds for denial of a pro hac vice application.

Attorney Toporovsky's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for the Honig Defendants is GRANTED. (ROA 154.) Attorney Sommer's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for the Honig Defendants is GRANTED. (ROA 158.) Attorney Rollnick's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. (ROA 115.) Attorney Richard's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. (ROA 118.)

Pro Hac Vice Appl., Exhibit B.) Accordingly, Rafat H. Abdeljaber is eligible for admission pro hac vice , and the application contains all the requisite components.

Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Applicant Michael Angelovich The Court finds that Applicant Michael Angelovich has complied with California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. The application by Michael Angelovich to be admitted pro hac vice to appear on behalf of Plaintiffs Neal and Jaye Eigler is GRANTED. The Court enters the proposed order filed by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs to give notice. 2. Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Applicant Bradley W. BeskinThe Court finds that Applicant Bradley W.

[tentative] Order RE: (1) application of paul killebrew to appear pro hac vice (2) application of maureen browne to appear pro hac vice MOVING PARTY: Paul A. Killebrew RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed (1) Application of Paul Killebrew to Appear Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Maureen F.

1) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 2) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice In its 10/14/2020 Minute Order, the Court GRANTED the Amended Unopposed Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Brian K. Brake and the Unopposed Verified Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Tayjes M. Shah, Esq. to appear pro hac vice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff Anabella Nguyen, associated with attorney Curtis Hoke, California SBN 282465.

Second, while Becker has stated that he has only applied to appear pro hac vice once in an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court in 2025[,] Becker did not state the cause in which he filed that application to appear as counsel pro hac vice, the exact date of filing, and whether or not it was granted. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 9.40, subd. (d)(5).)

HAO HU MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO LIAN ASCHER FOR DEFS FILED BY: HU, HAO *TENTATIVE RULING:* On June 17, 2026, attorney Lian Ascher (“Counsel”) filed an application for leave to appear on behalf of defendants pro hac vice in this matter (the “Pro Hac Vice Application”). The Pro Hac Vice Application was set for hearing on October 19, 2026. The motion is unopposed.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Application to appear pro hac vice.

The attorneys application to be admitted pro hac vice is granted. Moving party to give notice.

RULING : Granted Defendant Dometic Corporation moves for pro hac vice admission of attorney Zackary Rogers. Pro hac vice admission in California is governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. To be admitted pro hac vice, one must be a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court in any state, territory, or insular possession of the United States. ( California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

Trial Date: 5-5-25 MOTION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE MOVING PARTY: Defendants World Tech Toys, Inc., World Trading 23, Inc., and Kevork Kouyoumjian RESPONDING PARTY: No response filed RELIEF REQUESTED Defendants have requested that an attorney be admitted pro hac vice. RULING : Motion to be admitted pro hac vice is denied without prejudice on procedural grounds. ANALYSIS Defendants California counsel, Aaron M.

Carpenter to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice The court considered the moving papers filed in connection with each application. No opposition papers were filed. APPLICATION OF MARGARET E. SAATHOFF TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE Margaret E.

Phillips to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Specially Appearing Defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH; 8. Application of James B. Matthews, III, to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff The People of the State of California; 9. Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Robert D.

Blum to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice that defendant Zoetis has lodged with the Court.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA HG21109171: Singh VS Blue Creek Capital, LLC 01/03/2022 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in Department 19 Tentative Ruling The Motion to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by Rakhi Singh, Nitesh Singh on 12/01/2021 is Granted. Plaintiffs Rakhi and Nitesh Singhs’ Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Joseph D. Sibley IV (“Pro Hac Vice Applicant”), filed November 29, 2021, is GRANTED.

Ross 3/6/2019 .................. 18-2642 Valencia Pro Hac Vice 3/13/2019 Edward Baines applies to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent Defendant Mannington Mills Inc. Having read and considered the written motion, the court issues the following tentative ruling: No opposition has been filed. The application appears sufficient in all respects. The application of Edward Baines to appear pro hac vice is granted. Ross 3/6/2019

Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice - Kurt A. Offner After consideration of the Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice of Kurt A. Offner, filed on October 8, 2021, and the Supplemental Verified Application of Kurt A. Offner attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Mark J. Bloom, filed on January 4, 2021, the Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice of Kurt A. Offner is GRANTED. Plaintiff to give notice. 2.

Watkins ("Pro Hac Vice Applicants") to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice are GRANTED. The Court finds that attorney Pro Hac Vice Applicants meet all of the requirements for admission set forth in California Rule of Court rule 9.40. Plaintiff has paid the $500 fee for each application ($1,000 in total) as required by Government Code section 70617, subdivision (e)(1).

CU26-00891 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice TENTATIVE RULING.

1) Application to Admit Adrian Zareba Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company, Inc., and D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 2) Application to Admit Gretchen Woodruff Root Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company Inc., and D. F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 3) Application to Admit Thomas G Collins Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company, Inc., and D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 4) Status Conference The unopposed applications of Thomas G.

1) Application to Admit Adrian Zareba Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company, Inc., and D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 2) Application to Admit Gretchen Woodruff Root Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company Inc., and D. F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 3) Application to Admit Thomas G Collins Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Laguna Cookie Company, Inc., and D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 4) Status Conference The unopposed applications of Thomas G.

Muscante II to appear pro hac vice is GRANTED. III. DISPOSITION Plaintiffs Pro Hac Vice Application of Steven L. Caponi is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Pro Hac Vice Application of Falco A. Muscante II is GRANTED.

Sartorius to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice and the Verified Application of Sahand Farahati to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice .

Whitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. Counsel are reminded that an attorney whose application to appear as counsel pro hac vice has been granted shall pay to the superior court, on or before the anniversary of the date the application was granted, an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in the case. (Government Code section 70617, subdivision (e)(2).)

Clausen's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiffs is GRANTED. (ROA 304.) As to Attorney Travis Romero-Boeck's unopposed Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant, the court will hear this matter. (ROA 301.) Attorney Romero-Boeck's verified application states he has been admitted as counsel pro hac vice in one other California case in the last two years.

.: 19STCV04166 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION Date: June 12, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers. BACKGROUND Joel Glover applies to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendants. DISCUSSION The Court finds that the cases cited by Plaintiff in her opposition to the pro hac vice application of Joel Glover are distinguishable and do not apply to the pro hac vice application of Joel Glover.

RULING : Granted Plaintiff moves for pro hac vice admission of attorney Rick Freeman. Pro hac vice admission in California is governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. To be admitted pro hac vice, one must be a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court in any state, territory, or insular possession of the United States. ( California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

Plaintiffs' unopposed Application of Jennifer Mondino to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is granted. Plaintiffs' unopposed Application of Emily Martin to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is granted. Plaintiffs' unopposed Application of Sunu Chandy to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is granted.

1) Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint – continued at parties’ request to 1/4/2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department C32 2) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Heller) 3) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Thompson) 4) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Detzel) Pro Hac Vice Motions: The Court grants the Applications by Sandra L. Heller, Esq., Darcie Thompson, Esq., and C. Matthew Detzel, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice as Co-Counsel for Defendants. Each Applicant meets the requirements of California Rules of Court 9.40.

Enriquez establishes that she satisfied the requirements to appear as counsel pro hac vice pursuant to CRC, Rule 9.40. The court therefore GRANTS Maria G. Enriquezs application to appear as counsel pro hac vice. As to Daniel I. Schlessingers pro hac vice application, Mr.

Ebe submitted his verified pro hac vice application and the accompanying Notice of Motion and Motion for Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Admission through the State Bar of Californias online portal for pro hac vice applications. At the time of submission, the required $500 fee was paid to the State Bar of California. Attached as Exhibit 1 to the application is a receipt confirming payment and acknowledgment from the State Bar that Mr. Ebes pro hac vice application was received on November 8, 2024.

[tentative] Order RE: (1) application of christopher s. sundby to appear as counsel pro hac vice (2) application of gerald e. greenberg to appear as counsel pro hac vice MOVING PARTY: Applicant Christopher S. Sundby RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed (1) Application of Christopher S. Sundby to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Applicant Gerald E.

The Application of Wendy Lyon to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiffs is GRANTED.

Bonaiuto to Appear Pro Hac Vice {C.R.C.9.40} 2) Verified Application of Non-Resident Attorney D. Greg Blankinship to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice {C.R.C.9.40} 3) Verified Application of Non-Resident Attorney Joseph C. Hashmall to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice {C.R.C.9.40} 4) Verified Application of Non-Resident Attorney E. Mitchell Drake to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice {C.R.R.9.40} Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice of (1) Joseph C. Hashmall; (2) Michelle Drake; (3) D.

Gammon Fain (Fain) to appear pro hac vice on their behalf. (Notice Pro Hac Vice Fain, pg. 3; CRC, Rule 9.40.) Moving Defendants apply unopposed to permit Eugene Zilberman (Zilberman) to appear pro hac vice on their behalf. (Notice Pro Hac Vice Zilberman, pg. 3; CRC, Rule 9.40.) Background On March 6, 2024, Moving Defendants filed the instant applications for Kain and Zilberman to be admitted pro hac vice. As of the date of this hearing no opposition has been filed.

MOTION Notice Of Motion And Moiton To Appear Pro Hac Vice;Verified Application And Order To Appear Pro Hac Vice; DEFENDANT STATFORD CAREER INSTITUTE MOTION To Appear Pro Hac Vice;Verified Application And Order To Appear Pro Hac Vice; GRANT.(302/REQ/JU)

The Los Angeles Superior Court requires a fee for the Pro Hac Vice Application. ( See Cal. Gov. Code § 70617(e)(1) "The fee for filing in the superior court an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice is five hundred dollars ($500). This fee is in addition to any other fee required of the applicant.") Thereafter, applicants must pay an annual fee for renewal of pro hac vice status for each year a case continues. (Cal. Gov.

RULING : Granted Plaintiff Jade Mendez moves for pro hac vice admission of attorney Lori Bullock. Pro hac vice admission in California is governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. To be admitted pro hac vice, one must be a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court in any state, territory, or insular possession of the United States. ( California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

Therefore, the Court GRANTS Counsels motion to appear as counsel pro hac vice.

Rubin's unopposed Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals is GRANTED. (ROA 478.) As to Attorney Matthew J. Malinowski's unopposed Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Novartis, the court will hear this matter. (ROA 465.) Attorney Malinowski's verified application states he has been admitted as counsel pro hac vice in two other California cases in the last two years.

Interinsurance Exchange CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Breach of Contract/Warranty EVENT TYPE: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) Verified Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Mariglo Esherick CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Verified Application to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice, 10/28/2022 APPEARANCES David J Furtado, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s) telephonically.

OMahoney to appear pro hac vice in this action. RULING : The application is granted. The application of Tara C. OMahoney filed and served on 2/20/25 to appear pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Bolliger & Mabillard Consulting Engineers, Inc. in this action meets the requirements of CRC 9.40.

Motions Plaintiffs bring two motions for counsel to appear pro hac vice, the Motion for Molly M. Jamison to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice and Motion for Kirsten Jackson to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice. According to California Rule of Court (“CRC”) 9.40, an attorney must meet 3 requirements to appear pro hac vice.

Wilford to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice and the Verified Application of Anthony J. DAgostino to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice .

Erdreich appear pro hac vice in the current matter. The Declaration of Ryan L Erdreich contains all the required information, except the title of court in which the applicant has filed an application to appear pro hac vice in this state. The Declaration of Jeffrey M. Malsch does not contain two required statements: the applicants residence and the title of court in which the applicant has filed an application to appear pro hac vice in this state.

Wilford to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice and the Verified Application of Anthony J. DAgostino to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice .

The Salvation Army , Case No. 22PSCV03111 ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jane Does unopposed ex parte application granting the application of M. Stewart Ryan to be admitted pro hac vice, or alternatively, an order advancing the hearing date on the filed pro hac vice application. For the reasons stated herein, the application is granted.

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Re: Kaitlin Beach 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Re: Steven M Tarina 3. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Re: Katherine Turner 4. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Re: Kathryn Hoover Reassigned to Judge Nakamura, CX103

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Amy E. Davis with Christiansen Davis, LLC seeks to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff Ann Wang in this action. Nicole M. Battisti and Arthur J. Liederman with Morrison & Mahoney, LLP seek to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendants Inmode, Ltd. and Invasix, Inc. in this action.

Plaintiff moves for pro hac vice admission of attorney Derek Braslow. Pro hac vice admission in California is governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. To be admitted pro hac vice, one must be “ a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court in any state, territory, or insular possession of the United States.” ( California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

Appearance pro hac vice is a privilege and not a right under the United States Constitution. (Leis v. Flynt (1979) 439 U.S. 438, 441.)

Filuschs application to appear pro hac vice . The Court GRANTS Claiborne R. Hanes application to appear pro hac vice . The Court GRANTS Michael A. Hanins application to appear pro hac vice . The Court GRANTS Andrew L. Schwartzs application to appear pro hac vice . I.

Weiner’s Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice without prejudice.

The Los Angeles Superior Court requires a fee for the Pro Hac Vice Application. (See Cal. Gov. Code § 70617(e)(1) "The fee for filing in the superior court an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice is five hundred dollars ($500). This fee is in addition to any other fee required of the applicant.") Thereafter, applicants must pay an annual fee for renewal of pro hac vice status for each year a case continues. (Cal. Gov.

On confirmation of such service, the tentative ruling is as follows: The Verified Application of Attorney Josef Glynias to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 9.40.) The Verified Application of Attorney Laura Malugade to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 9.40.) The Verified Application of Attorney Keith Ybanez to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendants is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 9.40.)

Counsel licensed in another state may, in the courts discretion, be permitted to appear as counsel pro hac vice if counsel is associated with an attorney of record who is an active member of the California bar. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).) Appearance pro hac vice is a privilege and not a right under the United States Constitution. (Leis v. Flynt (1979) 439 U.S. 438, 441.)

Counsel licensed in another state may, in the courts discretion, be permitted to appear as counsel pro hac vice if counsel is associated with an attorney of record who is an active member of the California bar. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).) Appearance pro hac vice is a privilege and not a right under the United States Constitution. (Leis v. Flynt (1979) 439 U.S. 438, 441.)

PAHL FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE (2) APPLICATION OF NICHOLAS A. MARICIC FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE (3) APPLICATION OF THOMAS H.L. SELBY FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE MOVING PARTY: (1) Jessica L. Pahl, (2) Nicholas A. Maricic, and (3) Thomas H.L.

Kain (Kain) of P& K Park LLP to appear pro hac vice on their behalf. (Notice Pro Hac Vice Kain, pg. 2; CRC, Rule 9.40.) Moving Defendants apply unopposed to permit Charles Gilliam-Brownlee (Gilliam-Brownlee) of P& K Park LLP to appear pro hac vice on their behalf. (Notice Pro Hac Vice Gilliam-Brownlee, pg. 2; CRC, Rule 9.40.) Background On March 9, 2023, Plaintiff Darren Kubes (Kubes) (Plaintiff) filed his initial complaint (Complaint).

Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice Cal.

Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice Cal.

Floyd for Admission Pro Hac Vice are GRANTED.

Coloplast corp CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: PI/PD/WD - Other EVENT TYPE: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (CLM) For an order Admitting Nathaniel Jones Pro Hac Vice MOVING PARTY: Daniel OConnell, Lori Peterson CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice For an order Admitting Nathaniel Jones Pro Hac Vice, 10/26/2022 APPEARANCES Michael P Cutler, counsel, present for Plaintiff(s) telephonically.

.: BC662838 ORDER RE: AMENDED APPLICATIONS TO BE ADMITTED AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Date: November 5, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTIES: Neil G. Nandi (“Nandi”) and Jason P. Stiehl (“Stiehl”) Nandi and Stiehl filed separate amended applications to appear as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Don Lee Farms (“DLF”). APPLICATION OF NANDI The pro hac vice application of Nandi is compliant with California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40.

Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David J. Cooner The unopposed application by David J. Cooner to appear as counsel pro hac vice for defendant C.R. Bard Access Systems, Inc. (sued as Doe 31) is GRANTED for good cause shown. The application complies with all requirements of rule 9.40 of the California Rules of Court. The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the application. Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Zane C. Riester The unopposed application by Zane C.

The required pro hac vice criteria are met, the Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Kegan S. Andeskie is GRANTED. 2. All papers filed by Kegan S. Andeskie of NUKK-FREEMAN & CERRA, P.C. on behalf of Defendant UGE in this matter shall indicate appearance pro hac vice. Moving party to provide notice pursuant to CCP § 1019.5.

Cooper Pro Hac Vice (CRS #9598) is GRANTED.

This matter is on for hearing on two matters: (1) a Pro Hac Vice Application as to Attorney Rauvin Johl (2) a Pro Hac Vice Application as to Attorney Michael Heyison. Each is addressed, in turn, below. RULING ON PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION (as to Attorney Rauvin Johl) The Pro Hac Vice Application brought by defendant/cross-complainant Acacia Communications, Inc. (AC) as to admission of Attorney Rauvin Johl is DENIED without prejudice on procedural grounds.

Trial Date: N/A MOTION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE MOVING PARTY: Defendants Daniel Jason Streufert and ADSBExchange.com, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: No response filed RELIEF REQUESTED Defendants have requested that an attorney be admitted pro hac vice. RULING : Motion to be admitted pro hac vice is granted. ANALYSIS Defendants California counsel, Grant L. Royal, has filed an application for pro hac vice status for Illinois attorney Bryan M. Westhoff.

Mainfreight Limited, et al. , 21STCV00887 Application for Renewal of Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Andrew R. Young Application for Renewal of Pro Hac Vice for Attorney D.J. Young III Application for Renewal of Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stephanie A. Ball Moving Party Plaintiffs Susan Thoele, Benjamin Thoele, and Timothy Thoele I.

CONCLUSION The Court GRANTS the Verified Application to Appears as Counsel Pro Hac Vice .

Thompson to appear as counsel pro hac vice are denied without prejudice .

McLaughlin moves to appear as counsel Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen Joyce. The application and supplied declarations satisfy rule 9.40. (McLaughlin Decl., ¶¶ 1-6; Alexander Decl., ¶¶ 1-3, Ex. A.) A pro hac vice admittance is an exception to the general rule that an attorney practicing law in the State of California requires a license from the State Bar. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6125.) Additionally, there is no right to appear pro hac vice. ( Sheller v.

.: BC653918 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE MOVING PARTY : Defendant Cedars-Sinai Medical Center RESPONDING PARTY(S) : None as of November 29, 2022 REQUESTED RELIEF: 1. An order granting the application for Nicole A. Eichberger to appear as counsel pro hac vice TENTATIVE RULING: 1. Motion to be Admitted pro hac vice is GRANTED.

Plaintiff Greystone Loan Aggregator, LLC moves for pro hac vice admission of attorney Keith Aurzada. Pro hac vice admission in California is governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. To be admitted pro hac vice, one must be a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court in any state, territory, or insular possession of the United States. ( California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice The Verified Application of Craig Schuenemann to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40 is GRANTED. Pending Motion Counsel Craig A.

1.MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 2.MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 3.MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE The Court grants the Applications of (1) Adam D. Lewis, (2) Kala F. Sellers, and (3) Jonathan Kyle Findley, to appear pro hac vice to represent the Plaintiff in the present case. The Court orders the MPs to give notice. Moving party to give notice.

Chandler to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice. Tentative Ruling: To grant the application of attorney Aaron M. Chandler to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for this action for defendants Marty Van Tassell, Vantage Dairy Supplies CA. LLC, Vantage Dairy Supplies of Idaho, Inc. and Central Valley Supply.

.: 22STCV04913 DEFENDANTS APPLICATION TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE MOVING PARTY : Defendant Ninas Mexican Food RESPONDING PARTY(S): None as of July 22, 2022. REQUESTED RELIEF: 1. An order granting the application for Albert J. Bolet, III to appear as counsel pro hac vice TENTATIVE RULING: 1. Application to appear pro hac vice is GRANTED.

Strecker to appear pro hac vice is granted pending receipt of Streckers New York State Bar Number. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. (Safety-Kleen) (Moving Defendant) applies unopposed to admit Daniel R. Strecker (Strecker) to appear pro hac vice on its behalf. (Notice Pro Hac Vice, pg. 2; CRC, Rule 9.40.) Background On October 17, 2024, Moving Defendant filed the instant application for Strecker to be admitted pro hac vice.