The Honorable Ronald F. Frazier

San Diego County Superior Court, Department SD-65

Thumbnail of judge report

Discover if Hon. Frazier is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample

Download Hon. Frazier Report

Biography

Hon. Ronald F. Frazier is a judge for the Superior Court of San Diego County in California. He was appointed by former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on January 22, 2009, filling a vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Michael M. Anello.

Frazier earned a B.A. from California State University, Fullerton in 1977. He then received a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law in 1982.

Frazier began his legal career in 1982. He worked as an associate for Jones & Mullen until 1985, when he joined Mullen, Dofflemyre & Frazier as a shareholder. Then, in 1989, he served as shareholder and director for Shifflet, Walters, Kane & Konoske, a position he held until he became a partner for Walters, Frazier, Caietti, Rutan & Lopez in 1998. From 2000 to 2009, Frazier worked as an attorney in his own private practice, where he specialized in mediation, arbitration, and serious personal-injury cases. At this time, he also served as counsel for Dietz, Gilmore & Associates.

Frazier is a former president and director of the San Diego Inn of Court.

He is registered to vote as a Democrat.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Ronald F. Frazier

  • BAINBRIDGE CAPITAL INC VS VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Volt Management Corp.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration with Plaintiff and Dismiss or in the Alternative Stay the Action as to Volt is CONTINUED to September 25, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 65 on the court's own motion. (ROA 25.)

    The court observes there are multiple discovery motions se...

  • MAAS VS MCKINNON BROADCASTING CO KUSI-TV 51

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant McKinnon Broadcasting Company's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 is DENIED. (ROA 69.)

    The anti-SLAPP statute provides the prevailing defendant on such motion "shall" be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs. (Code Civ. Proc. §...

  • RONALD E STADTMUELLER THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR LEUCADIA GROUP LLC VS. HILL KERTSCHER & WHARTON LLP

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    The court observes Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intent to File First Amended Complaint in Lieu of Opposition to Demurrer on September 2, 2020. (ROA 76.) However, to date, no First Amended Complaint has been filed with the court. In addition, no opposition to Defendant Caldarelli Hejmanowski Page & Leer LLP'...

  • ADDIRAHMAN VS SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant American Medical Response of San Diego, Inc.'s ("AMR's) Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (ROA 21.) Defendant Colt Myers' Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is also SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (R...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Demurrer to Cross-Complaint

    Cross-Defendant California Investment Bankers, Inc.'s demurrer to Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Amended Cross-Complaint is OVERRULED. (ROA 89.) The challenged cross-claims are sufficiently alleged to survive demurrer.

    Motion to Be Relieved

    The c...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Demurrer to Cross-Complaint

    Cross-Defendant California Investment Bankers, Inc.'s demurrer to Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Amended Cross-Complaint is OVERRULED. (ROA 89.) The challenged cross-claims are sufficiently alleged to survive demurrer.

    Motion to Be Relieved

    The c...

  • JONES VS FLOWING STREAMS OF NEVADA LLC

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendants Flowing Streams of Nevada LLC's and Vanna C. Kaura's unopposed Demurrer to Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. (ROA 25.) As to Defendant Flowing Streams of Nevada LLC, the demurrer is sustained as to the 12th and 13th causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10...

  • RICHMAN VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Douglas D. Richman's Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED. (ROA 268.) Defendant Regents of the University of California argues Plaintiff is precluded from obtaining fees, relying on Regents of University of California (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 703. The court does not agree. Goldbaum determined Regents...

  • WAHLSTROM VS GLORIA

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Todd Gloria's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. (ROA 42.)

    Plaintiff commenced this action against Gloria and Defendant San Diego County Democratic Party on August 19, 2019. (ROA 1.) Plaintiff then filed an Amended Verified Complaint on February 28, 2020. (ROA...

  • MCMILLAN VS CHAKER

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Vania Chaker's Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike Complaint is ordered off calendar. (ROA 111.)

    Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims against Defendant Vania Chaker on May 29, 2020. (ROA 122.) As such, this court has lost jurisdiction to rule on Defendant's motion. (Law Offices o...

  • ADDIRAHMAN VS SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant American Medical Response of San Diego, Inc.'s ("AMR's) Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (ROA 21.) Defendant Colt Myers' Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is also SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (R...

  • ASPEYTIA VS MA MORTENSON COMPANY

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is GRANTED. (ROA 42.) The final approval hearing is scheduled for March 26, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in this department. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs and Plaintiffs' service awards is also scheduled for March 26, 2021 at 8...

  • BERRY VS SIZZLING PLATTER LLC [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is GRANTED. (ROA 48.) The final approval hearing is scheduled for March 19, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in this department. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs and Plaintiffs' service awards is also scheduled for March 19, 2021 at 8...

  • BANKERS LIFE WAGE AND HOUR CASES JCCP4954 [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' motion for protective order is DENIED. Plaintiffs have not presented sufficient facts or provided sufficient California authority to support the Court's granting a protective order. Notwithstanding the denial of Plaintiffs' motion for protective order, given the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic s...

  • BANKERS LIFE WAGE AND HOUR CASES JCCP4954 [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' motion for protective order is DENIED. Plaintiffs have not presented sufficient facts or provided sufficient California authority to support the Court's granting a protective order. Notwithstanding the denial of Plaintiffs' motion for protective order, given the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic s...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • ARANDA VS COUNTRY APARTMENTS

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Manuel Alfonso Aranda Motion for Trial Preference is DENIED without prejudice. (ROA 24.) Plaintiff brings her motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 36, subdivisions (a), (d), and (e). However, regardless of the potential merit of Plaintiff's arguments, San Diego Superior Court has su...

  • CEJA VS SILVERGATE BANK [E-FILE]

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Silvergate Bank's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint is DENIED. (ROA 9.)

    Plaintiff Mario Ceja alleges a single cause of action for violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq., California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"). Plaintiff alleges ...

  • LEHECKA VS. J PAR INC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    The court has considered the papers pertaining to Defendant J. Par, Inc.'s Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions, Form Interrogatories, and Special Interrogatories propounded on Martin Petrik. As with the first nine motions set for August 21 and August 28, 2020, the substantive por...

  • INBODY VS FCA US LLC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant FCA US LLC's Demurrer to the Sixth Cause of Action of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. (ROA 45.)

    The court finds Defendant has not sufficiently demonstrated this cause of action is time-barred. In particular, the court notes Plaintiff pled his claims w...

  • CAROL ANN HOWARD AS TRUSTEE OF THE ANDREW MILLS TRUST VS ALBENCE & ASSOCIATES APC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Oatman's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Defendant Jack L. Oatman, Jr.'s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is CONTINUED to January 29, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 65. (ROA 224.) Defendant argues Plaintiff lacks standing to bring her claims in this ac...

  • SIMAJ VS LEONARD

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Attorney Yosi Yahoudai's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Mario Simaj is GRANTED. (ROA 96.)

    Attorney Yahoudai lodged a proposed order, but it no longer contains the correct dates for future hearings in this case. Counsel is directed to provide a completed proposed order for the court'...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Ronald F. Frazier

  • BAINBRIDGE CAPITAL INC VS VOLT MANAGEMENT CORP

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Volt Management Corp.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration with Plaintiff and Dismiss or in the Alternative Stay the Action as to Volt is CONTINUED to September 25, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 65 on the court's own motion. (ROA 25.)

    The court observes there are multiple discovery motions se...

  • MAAS VS MCKINNON BROADCASTING CO KUSI-TV 51

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant McKinnon Broadcasting Company's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 is DENIED. (ROA 69.)

    The anti-SLAPP statute provides the prevailing defendant on such motion "shall" be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs. (Code Civ. Proc. §...

  • RONALD E STADTMUELLER THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR LEUCADIA GROUP LLC VS. HILL KERTSCHER & WHARTON LLP

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    The court observes Plaintiff filed a Notice of Intent to File First Amended Complaint in Lieu of Opposition to Demurrer on September 2, 2020. (ROA 76.) However, to date, no First Amended Complaint has been filed with the court. In addition, no opposition to Defendant Caldarelli Hejmanowski Page & Leer LLP'...

  • ADDIRAHMAN VS SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant American Medical Response of San Diego, Inc.'s ("AMR's) Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (ROA 21.) Defendant Colt Myers' Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is also SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (R...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Demurrer to Cross-Complaint

    Cross-Defendant California Investment Bankers, Inc.'s demurrer to Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Amended Cross-Complaint is OVERRULED. (ROA 89.) The challenged cross-claims are sufficiently alleged to survive demurrer.

    Motion to Be Relieved

    The c...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Demurrer to Cross-Complaint

    Cross-Defendant California Investment Bankers, Inc.'s demurrer to Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Amended Cross-Complaint is OVERRULED. (ROA 89.) The challenged cross-claims are sufficiently alleged to survive demurrer.

    Motion to Be Relieved

    The c...

  • JONES VS FLOWING STREAMS OF NEVADA LLC

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendants Flowing Streams of Nevada LLC's and Vanna C. Kaura's unopposed Demurrer to Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. (ROA 25.) As to Defendant Flowing Streams of Nevada LLC, the demurrer is sustained as to the 12th and 13th causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10...

  • RICHMAN VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Douglas D. Richman's Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED. (ROA 268.) Defendant Regents of the University of California argues Plaintiff is precluded from obtaining fees, relying on Regents of University of California (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 703. The court does not agree. Goldbaum determined Regents...

  • WAHLSTROM VS GLORIA

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Todd Gloria's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. (ROA 42.)

    Plaintiff commenced this action against Gloria and Defendant San Diego County Democratic Party on August 19, 2019. (ROA 1.) Plaintiff then filed an Amended Verified Complaint on February 28, 2020. (ROA...

  • MCMILLAN VS CHAKER

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Vania Chaker's Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Strike Complaint is ordered off calendar. (ROA 111.)

    Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims against Defendant Vania Chaker on May 29, 2020. (ROA 122.) As such, this court has lost jurisdiction to rule on Defendant's motion. (Law Offices o...

  • ADDIRAHMAN VS SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant American Medical Response of San Diego, Inc.'s ("AMR's) Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (ROA 21.) Defendant Colt Myers' Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is also SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend. (R...

  • ASPEYTIA VS MA MORTENSON COMPANY

    Sep 17, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is GRANTED. (ROA 42.) The final approval hearing is scheduled for March 26, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in this department. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs and Plaintiffs' service awards is also scheduled for March 26, 2021 at 8...

  • BERRY VS SIZZLING PLATTER LLC [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is GRANTED. (ROA 48.) The final approval hearing is scheduled for March 19, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. in this department. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs and Plaintiffs' service awards is also scheduled for March 19, 2021 at 8...

  • BANKERS LIFE WAGE AND HOUR CASES JCCP4954 [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' motion for protective order is DENIED. Plaintiffs have not presented sufficient facts or provided sufficient California authority to support the Court's granting a protective order. Notwithstanding the denial of Plaintiffs' motion for protective order, given the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic s...

  • BANKERS LIFE WAGE AND HOUR CASES JCCP4954 [E-FILE]

    Sep 10, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs' motion for protective order is DENIED. Plaintiffs have not presented sufficient facts or provided sufficient California authority to support the Court's granting a protective order. Notwithstanding the denial of Plaintiffs' motion for protective order, given the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic s...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • JOHNSTON VS RAINBOW BRIDGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Rainbow Bridge Investment Corporation's Demurrer to Plaintiff Johnston Holding Company, Inc.'s Third Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. (ROA 96.) Rainbow's Motion to Strike Portions of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and moot in part. (ROA 99.)

    As...

  • ARANDA VS COUNTRY APARTMENTS

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Manuel Alfonso Aranda Motion for Trial Preference is DENIED without prejudice. (ROA 24.) Plaintiff brings her motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 36, subdivisions (a), (d), and (e). However, regardless of the potential merit of Plaintiff's arguments, San Diego Superior Court has su...

  • CEJA VS SILVERGATE BANK [E-FILE]

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Silvergate Bank's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint is DENIED. (ROA 9.)

    Plaintiff Mario Ceja alleges a single cause of action for violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq., California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"). Plaintiff alleges ...

  • LEHECKA VS. J PAR INC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    The court has considered the papers pertaining to Defendant J. Par, Inc.'s Motions to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions, Form Interrogatories, and Special Interrogatories propounded on Martin Petrik. As with the first nine motions set for August 21 and August 28, 2020, the substantive por...

  • INBODY VS FCA US LLC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant FCA US LLC's Demurrer to the Sixth Cause of Action of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. (ROA 45.)

    The court finds Defendant has not sufficiently demonstrated this cause of action is time-barred. In particular, the court notes Plaintiff pled his claims w...

  • CAROL ANN HOWARD AS TRUSTEE OF THE ANDREW MILLS TRUST VS ALBENCE & ASSOCIATES APC

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Oatman's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Defendant Jack L. Oatman, Jr.'s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is CONTINUED to January 29, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 65. (ROA 224.) Defendant argues Plaintiff lacks standing to bring her claims in this ac...

  • SIMAJ VS LEONARD

    Sep 03, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Attorney Yosi Yahoudai's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Mario Simaj is GRANTED. (ROA 96.)

    Attorney Yahoudai lodged a proposed order, but it no longer contains the correct dates for future hearings in this case. Counsel is directed to provide a completed proposed order for the court'...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.