Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
The Department shall keep a record of all interpretations made by the Commission which shall be available for review by the public or any governmental agency and shall provide notice to the petitioner(s) of the Department's findings.
Notes
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 25 , § 90Note: Authority cited: Sections 17003.5, 17921, 50061.5 and 50559, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 17930, Health and Safety Code.
Proc., § 431.30(d) states, “If the complaint is subject to Article 2 (commencing with Section 90) of Chapter 5.1 of Title 1 of Part 1 or is not verified, a general denial is sufficient but only puts in issue the material allegations of the complaint.” Here, the complaint in this suit is not verified. Neither Plaintiffs nor their counsel swore by the allegations therein.
MARIA ALICIA OLIVARES, ET AL. VS RICARDO LUNA, ET AL.
20STCV03812
Aug 31, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
other
Respondent maintains Section 90 of the CCDS bylaws allow its Board to remove any CCDS officer by two-thirds vote, when it is in best interest of the Society. Section 90 provides, “Any director or officer may be removed by the Board of Directors whenever, in its judgment, the best interest of the Society would be served thereby.” Petitioner argues that a trustee is neither a “director” nor an “officer” and therefore not subject to removal by the CCDS Board under Section 90.
CLARK VS. CONTRA COSTA DENTAL
MSN19-1774
Oct 10, 2019
Steve K. Austin
Contra Costa County, CA
Respondent maintains Section 90 of the CCDS bylaws allow its Board to remove any CCDS officer by two-thirds vote, when it is in best interest of the Society. Section 90 provides, “Any director or officer may be removed by the Board of Directors whenever, in its judgment, the best interest of the Society would be served thereby.” Petitioner argues that a trustee is neither a “director” nor an “officer” and therefore not subject to removal by the CCDS Board under Section 90.
CLARK VS. CONTRA COSTA DENTAL
MSN19-1774
Nov 07, 2019
Steve K. Austin
Contra Costa County, CA
(d) If the complaint is subject to Article 2 (commencing with Section 90) of Chapter 5.1 of Title 1 of Part 1 or is n ot verifie d, a general denial is sufficient but only puts in issue the material allegations of the complaint. If the complaint is verified , unless the complaint is subject to Article 2 (commencing with Section 90) of Chapter 5.1 of Title 1 of Part 1, the denial of the allegations shall be made positively or according to the information and belief of the defendant. ...
KENETTE PENAFIEL VS RONALD A. MANOSCA ENRIQUEZ
20BBCV00919
Jul 30, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
other
C.C.P §431.30(d) provides, [i]f the complaint is subject to Article 2 (commencing with section 90) of Chapter 5.1 of Title I of Part 1 or is not verified, a general denial is sufficient but only puts in issue the material allegations of the complaint.
EASTERN FUNDING LLC, A SUBSIDIARY OF BROOKLINE BANK, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS 1553 LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
23STCV16928
Mar 06, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
Jul 07, 2015
Dismissal
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles County, CA
AUTO (Limited Jurisdiction)
Torts
Automobile
Nov 03, 2017
Dismissal
San Bernardino
San Bernardino County, CA
Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Limited
Torts
Automobile
Aug 18, 2008
Dismissal
Kern County
Kern County, CA
Jan 21, 2015
Dismissal
San Mateo County
San Mateo County, CA
Jan 16, 2006
Consolidation
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
Creditor
Collections
Raymond Bouldin FILE D¢ Caliform 13228 Berts Way Superior Court of Angeles y of Los Eastvale, CA 92880 County (909) 685-3948 IN PRO PER: Raymond Bouldin, Defendant DEC …
Jul 22, 2020
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial
Los Angeles County, CA
Dec 15, 2021
Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division West District, Santa Monica Courthouse, Department R SC128408 June 23, 2023 WON GROUP, LLC VS KAMBIZ KABI 10:30 AM Judge: Honorable Mark H. Epstein CSR: Yolanda Tanner, CSR # 12785 Judicial Assistant: V. Yonke…
Nov 22, 2017
Pending
Los Angeles County, CA
Jun 23, 2023
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
HANNON SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jun-09-2014 3:44 pm Case Number: CGC-14-538489 Filing Date: Jun-09-2014 3:42 Filed by: Juke Box: 001 Image: 04511641 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES SEAN MARTIN VS. SHANON LOFTUS et al 001004511641 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.www.hedanichoy.com Hedani, Choy, Spalding & Salvagione, LLP 595 Market Street | Suite 1100 | San Francisco CA 94105 Tel (415)…
San Francisco County, CA
Jun 09, 2014
QUIET TITLE - REAL PROPERTY
GEORGE APOSHIAN, ESQ., Bar # 303238 LAURA M. D’ANNA, ESQ., Bar # 266113 Electronically Filed PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. 1/14/2020 12:18 PM 6800 Owensmouth Avenue, Suite 290 Superior Court of California Canoga Park…
Clerk’s Copy Reservation Number: 009130925-07 Pro Se James Hilton Jr. ELECTRONICALLY 27163 Via Debra F I L E D Menifee, CA 92586 …
Apr 16, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
Sep 17, 2019
CIVIL RIGHTS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.