Thank you
Someone from our team will get in touch with you shortly
How to Prepare a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award?
What Is a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award?
Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.) Section 1285 authorizes a petition to confirm only by a "party to the arbitration in which the award has been made." California trial courts continue to recite this framework verbatim: on a petition to confirm, correct, or vacate, the court has exactly four options — confirm the award as made, correct and confirm it as corrected, vacate it, or dismiss the proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1286; UniFirst Corporation v. In and Out Tire LLC (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 55, Dec. 2, 2025) [tentative ruling], citing Hall v. Superior Court (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 427, 433; One Ring Networks, Inc. v. Sagoo (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 26, Aug. 10, 2023) [tentative ruling], citing Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp. (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 1, 10.)
Judicial review is deliberately narrow. As the court explained in Castano v. Brown (L.A. Super. Ct., Aug. 14, 2020) (Hon. Michael P. Linfield) [tentative ruling], "[a]rbitration awards are subject to very limited judicial review, and the merits of the controversy are not reviewable on a petition to confirm, vacate, or correct."
Required Contents of the Petition (§ 1285.4)
The petition must:
- set forth the substance of, or attach a copy of, the agreement to arbitrate (unless the petitioner denies such an agreement exists);
- set forth the names of the arbitrators; and
- set forth or attach a copy of the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.
(Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.4.) Courts confirm when these contents are supplied. In UniFirst, the petition was granted because the petitioner attached the arbitration agreement (Attachment 4(b)), named the arbitrator, and attached the award (Attachment 8(c)) — the court cited Loeb v. Record (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 431, 450 for the required contents. The same box-checking analysis drove confirmation in One Ring Networks (§ 1285.4 satisfied by attaching the agreement, naming the arbitrator, and setting forth the award of $22,096.38) and in LG H&H Co., Ltd. v. Kim (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 78, Apr. 8, 2024) [tentative ruling].
Timeliness — Four-Year Outer Limit and Ten-Day Floor (§§ 1288, 1288.4, 1283.6)
The petition must be filed and served no more than four years after the award is served on the petitioner (Code Civ. Proc. § 1288), and — a point courts now emphasize alongside the outer limit — not less than 10 days after service of the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1288.4.) The neutral arbitrator must serve a signed copy of the award personally, by registered/certified mail, or as provided in the agreement. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1283.6.) UniFirst applied this squarely: award served November 15, 2024, petition served August 22, 2025 — "[a]ccordingly, the petition is timely."
Service of the Petition (§ 1290.4)
Service of the petition, the notice of hearing, and any other supporting papers must be accomplished in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1290.4(a).) If the agreement is silent and service is within California, service must be made as for a summons. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1290.4(b)(1).)
This is the single most common reason petitions fail on Trellis, and recent rulings show courts enforcing it strictly:
- Serving the wrong papers. In HaHa Smart, Inc. v. Blue Sky Energy Solutions, LLC (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 52, May 5, 2023) [tentative ruling], the petition was denied without prejudice because the proof of service showed the petitioner served only the notice of hearing and a supporting declaration — not the petition itself (form ADR-106). "The notice of hearing and supporting declaration are not enough. Petitioner must serve the petition itself."
- Defective or missing proof of service → continuance. In Skelton v. Woodbury Financial Services, Inc. (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 76, July 16, 2024) [tentative ruling], the court continued the hearing and ordered the petitioner to properly serve the petition and notice of the continued hearing and to file proof of service. The court took the same course in Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Spectrum Global Enterprises, Inc. (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. K, June 5, 2023) [tentative ruling].
Practical takeaway from the current rulings: serve the petition itself plus the notice of hearing and all supporting papers, in the agreement's manner or, if silent, as a summons, and file a proof of service that specifically identifies the petition among the documents served.
Response, and the "Deemed Admitted" Rule (§§ 1290, 1290.6, 1288.2)
The allegations of a duly served and filed petition are deemed admitted unless a response is duly served and filed. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1290, 1290.6.) The response deadlines are strict: a response seeking to vacate or correct must be served and filed within 10 days of service of the petition to confirm, and in no event later than 100 days after service of a signed copy of the award. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1290.6, 1288.2.)
One Ring Networks is the current illustration of how these deadlines decide contested petitions. The respondent's competing petition to correct or vacate was filed both more than 100 days after the award was served (award served Dec. 13, 2022; deadline Mar. 23, 2023; served Apr. 24, 2023) and outside the 10-day window after service of the petition to confirm. Because the respondent offered no explanation, the court held it "cannot consider" the untimely challenge, citing Law Finance Group, LLC v. Key (2023) 14 Cal.5th 932, 945 — and confirmed the award. A response does not have to defeat confirmation: in Tat Chan v. HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. (L.A. Super. Ct., Dept. 55, Mar. 3, 2026) [tentative ruling], the respondent filed a response but the petition was still granted.
Grounds for Vacatur — When Confirmation Is Denied on the Merits (§ 1286.2)
Even a facially compliant petition can be denied where a statutory vacatur ground exists. Section 1286.2 is written in the disjunctive: the court "shall vacate the award if the court determines any of the following," including that (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means, or (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers.
Castano v. Brown denied confirmation on exactly these grounds. The court found the award was procured by "undue means" because the arbitrator gave notice by letter rather than by "e-mail, certified or registered mail" as the agreement required, and that the arbitrator "exceeded his powers" by conducting the arbitration in Virginia instead of Los Angeles and failing to state whether California law was applied (§ 1286.2(a)(1), (a)(4)). The court also rejected the petitioner's argument that due-process misconduct under (a)(3) was the only path to vacatur — the statute is disjunctive.
Judgment, Enforcement, and Costs (§§ 1287.4, 1293.2)
If the award is confirmed, judgment is entered in conformity with it, and once entered the judgment "may be enforced like any other judgment of the court in which it is entered." (Code Civ. Proc. § 1287.4.) Courts routinely require the petitioner to submit a proposed judgment that tracks the award — in JPG Law, APC v. Long (Santa Barbara Super. Ct., May 12, 2023) (Hon. Donna Geck) [tentative ruling], the court granted the petition but directed the petitioner to submit an amended proposed order reflecting "the precise award that was made by the arbitrator."
On confirmation, the court awards costs as provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 1021 et seq. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1293.2.) One Ring Networks confirms the mechanics: attorney's fees and costs are recoverable on a petition to confirm (§ 1293.2; MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Gorman (2006) 147 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 7), by noticed motion (fees) and memorandum of costs (costs), with any interest set out as a calculation in the proposed judgment.
Practice Summary — What the Current Rulings Reward and Punish
| Requirement | Statute | What courts do |
|---|---|---|
| Petition contents (agreement, arbitrators, award) | § 1285.4 | Confirm when all three attached — UniFirst, One Ring, LG H&H |
| Timeliness (≤ 4 yrs, ≥ 10 days) | §§ 1288, 1288.4, 1283.6 | Confirm if within window — UniFirst |
| Serve the petition itself + notice + papers | § 1290.4 | Deny without prejudice / continue for defective service — HaHa Smart, Skelton, Creditors Adjustment Bureau |
| Response deadlines (10 days / 100 days) | §§ 1290.6, 1288.2 | Untimely vacatur challenge disregarded; award confirmed — One Ring |
| Vacatur grounds (disjunctive) | § 1286.2 | Deny confirmation for undue means / exceeding powers — Castano |
| Judgment + costs/fees | §§ 1287.4, 1293.2 | Enter conforming judgment; fees by motion, costs by memo — JPG Law, One Ring |
Rulings for Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award in California
PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285) TENTATIVE RULING: Ameli Law Group’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against Respondent Long Beach Towing, Inc. is GRANTED. PETITIONER TO FILE PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS. PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285) TENTATIVE RULING: Ameli Law Group’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against Respondent Long Beach Towing, Inc. is GRANTED. PETITIONER TO FILE PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS.
-
Name
AMELI LAW GROUP VS LONG BEACH TOWING, INC.
-
Case No.
20STCP01414
-
Hearing
Oct 15, 2020
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Motion/Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 Set for hearing on Friday, August 28, 2009, line 2, PLAINTIFF LIQUID REALITY ADVISORS, LLC, SCOTT LANDRESS Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To CCP 1285. Petition to confirm the Arbitration Award is granted.
-
Name
LIQUID REALITY ADVISORS, LLC ET AL VS. BYRON T. SHEETS ET AL
-
Case No.
CGC06455762
-
Hearing
Aug 28, 2009
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Proc., § 1285, et seq.) To vacate the arbitration status conference set for August 30, 2022. Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
LISA FOSTER VS. FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
-
Case No.
18CECG01122
-
Hearing
Aug 30, 2022
-
County
Fresno County, CA
s unopposed petition to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED. Once an award has been issued by the arbitrator in a contractual arbitration, any party may petition the court to confirm the award. CCP §1285. If a petition or response under CCP §§ 1285 through 1287.6 is duly served and filed after an award has been rendered, the court shall confirm the award as made unless, in accordance with those statutes, it corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award, or dismisses the proceeding.
-
Name
RENOVATE AMERICA INC VS WALLIS
-
Case No.
37-2017-00005697-CU-BC-CTL
-
Hearing
Sep 22, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. John S. Meyer
-
County
San Diego County, CA
-
Type
Contract
-
Sub Type
Breach
A petition to confirm an award must name as respondents all parties to the arbitration, and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc. §1285.)
-
Name
W. DAVID COWIN V. EDWARD CHATOIAN
-
Case No.
17CECG02009
-
Hearing
Oct 12, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Alan Simpson
-
County
Fresno County, CA
-
Type
Administrative
-
Sub Type
Enforcement
Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award; Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award (C.C.P. 1285, 1285.4, And 1290) SET FOR HEARING ON MONDAY, JULY 30, 2007, LINE 7. PLAINTIFF THE K.P.A. GROUP'S Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award (C.C.P. 1285, 1285.4, And 1290) IS GRANTED, NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/PJM)
-
Name
THE KPA GROUP VS. EDWARD J. GEE & ASSOCIATES, A PROFESSIONAL
-
Case No.
CGC06454102
-
Hearing
Jul 30, 2007
-
Judge
Hon. PATRICK J. MAHONEY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is DENIED. Petitioners fail to satisfy Code of Civil Procedure sections 1285 and 1285.4(a). The Court sets an OSC re filing and service of an Amended Petition for MAY 4, 2020 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. ANY AMENDED PETITION IS TO BE FILED ON JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA ADR-106 FORM, WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY CREATED FOR A PETITION TO CONFIRM CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD.
-
Name
IN THE MATTER OF: HELEN E. ANDREOLI, ET AL.
-
Case No.
19STCP03390
-
Hearing
Mar 02, 2020
-
Judge
Hon. Serena R. Murillo
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Discussion “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (CCP § 1285, emphasis added.)
-
Name
ARDEN SILVERMAN VS MAHAFFEY LAW GROUP, PC
-
Case No.
19STCP01039
-
Hearing
Dec 05, 2019
-
Judge
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Petitioner Domestic Linen Supply Co., Inc.’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. CCP § 1285 et seq. Per CCP § 1285 “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” Relief is proper as Petitioner has complied with all the requirements of CCP § 1285 et seq.
-
Name
DOMESTIC LINEN SUPPLY CO INC VS AFFORDABLE ENGINES INC
-
Case No.
16K12711
-
Hearing
Apr 04, 2017
-
Judge
Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Explanation: The Petition Conforms with Code of Civil Procedure section 1285 and May be Granted Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
SCOTT SCHROEDER VS. RANDALL KING
-
Case No.
25CECG02293
-
Hearing
Aug 21, 2025
-
County
Fresno County, CA
(“Respondent”) in the sum of $2,233, plus $400 in attorney’s fees and administrative fee of the arbitration. On March 25, 2019, SBS assigned its right to the Arbitration Award to Capital Asset Protection. (6/7/19 Amended Petition, Attach. 8c(ii).) Petitioner Arden Silverman dba Capital Asset Protection (“Petitioner”) brought a Petition to Confirm of Arbitration Award (the “Petition”) on April 2, 2019 and an Amended Petition to Confirm of Arbitration Award (the “Amended Petition”) on June 7.
-
Name
ARDEN SILVERMAN VS MAHAFFEY LAW GROUP, PC
-
Case No.
19STCP01039
-
Hearing
Oct 08, 2019
-
Judge
James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
.: BC660534 Hearing Date: October 13, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to confirm arbitration award Defendant BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (“Defendant”) moves to confirm the arbitration award in the underlying arbitration with Plaintiff Nahid Bahrami (“Plaintiff”). Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, any party to an arbitration may petition the court to confirm an arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
KEN MAREFAT ET AL VS BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA LLC ET AL
-
Case No.
BC660534
-
Hearing
Oct 13, 2020
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
-
Type
Personal Injury/ Tort
-
Sub Type
other
Lamb Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp Section 1285 DEFENDANTS THE ARNS LAW FIRM, PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CCP SECTION 1285 (TRANSFERRED FROM DEPT. 301) GRANT- PETITION TO CONFIRM ABITRATION AWARD.(302/REQ/DR)
-
Name
GEORGE LISKA VS. THE ARNS LAW FIRM ET AL
-
Case No.
CGC03416953
-
Hearing
Apr 03, 2003
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Petitioner’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. Petitioner is ordered to submit a proposed judgment that sets forth in the body of the judgment the terms of the arbitration award. ANALYSIS: A petition to confirm arbitration award may be brought per CCP §§1285 and 1285.4. CCP §1285.4 requires (1) a copy of the written arbitration agreement or terms thereof set forth in petition and (2) the arbitrator’s name, and (3) a copy of the award.
-
Name
GORMAN & MILLER VS NEXTENGINE, INC.
-
Case No.
SS029299
-
Hearing
Aug 30, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Lisa Hart Cole
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
LEGAL STANDARD Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.) If a petition or response under this chapter is duly served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, whether rendered in this state or another state, unless in accordance with this chapter it corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1286, bold emphasis added.)
-
Name
COINBASE, INC. VS ADAM LAU KUNZE
-
Case No.
26STCP01514
-
Hearing
Jun 18, 2026
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Hearing On Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award (C.C.P. 1285). Set for hearing on Thursday, January 15, 2009, line 7, PETITIONER SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION , LOCAL 1021'S Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award (C.C.P. 1285). GRANT CONFIRMATION OF AWARD. =(302/PHA/PB)
-
Name
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION , LOCAL 1021 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
-
Case No.
CPF08509014
-
Hearing
Jan 15, 2009
-
Judge
Hon. PAUL H. ALVARADO
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”
-
Name
BURGESS SMITH AND WATHEN VII VS. CHRIS & KEN ENTERPRISES, INC.
-
Case No.
19CECG02950
-
Hearing
Aug 30, 2022
-
County
Fresno County, CA
CONCLUSION Therefore, the petition to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED.
-
Name
ANDREW BATKIN VS WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION
-
Case No.
22STCP01472
-
Hearing
Jun 01, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
W. DAVID COWIN V. EDWARD CHATOIAN
-
Case No.
17CECG02009
-
Hearing
Aug 30, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Alan Simpson
-
County
Fresno County, CA
-
Type
Administrative
-
Sub Type
Enforcement
Defendants/Respondents Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., Kaiser Foundations Hospitals, and Southern California Permanente Medical Group petition to confirm an arbitration award granting their motion for summary judgment and dismissal of Superior Court action, pursuant to CCP § 1285. Pursuant to CCP § 1285, any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
ADEVA VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTHPLAN INC.
-
Case No.
30-2016-00883701-CU-MM-CJC
-
Hearing
Nov 01, 2018
-
Judge
Hon. Richard LEE
-
County
Orange County, CA
Notice Of Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Per Ccp 1285 Et.Seq. PETITIONER ROBERT APPLEBY, MAYNARD LICHTERMAN Notice Of Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Per Ccp 1285 Et.Seq.: GRANT No opposition filed. (302/PHA/JU)
-
Name
ROBERT J APPLEBY ET AL VS. MICHAEL NAVONE
-
Case No.
CPF04504346
-
Hearing
Aug 12, 2004
-
Judge
Hon. PAUL H. ALVARADO
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Procedural Requirements “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.... The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.) A party may seek to confirm the arbitration award at least ten days, but no more than four years, after service of the award. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1288, 1288.4.)
-
Name
PINNACLE WIRELESS, LLC VS RJ INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY, INC., ET AL.
-
Case No.
20STCP03715
-
Hearing
Apr 13, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
On July 19, 2023, the Court compelled the parties to arbitration, and stayed the action pending arbitration. On July 21, 2025, ADO filed the instant Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award (the Petition). II. LEGAL STANDARD Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.)
-
Name
MARIA MORENO VS BREVILLE USA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
-
Case No.
22STCV22936
-
Hearing
Sep 17, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
A court may not vacate or correct an award unless a petition or response requesting that the award be vacated or corrected has been filed. ( Code Civ. Proc §§ 1286.4, 1286.8.) Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 provides: Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
MILANA LE GEZA VS WINDSOR TERRACE HEALTHCARE CENTER
-
Case No.
BC705622
-
Hearing
Nov 17, 2021
-
Judge
Hon. Renee C. Reyna
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS GRANTED. Background On October 1, 2020, Petitioner Sitrick Group, LLC filed the instant petition to confirm arbitration award naming as respondent i3 Brands, Inc. The petition seeks to confirm the arbitration award issued on September 17, 2020 in the amount of $46,578.61. Legal Standard Per CCP § 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
SITRICK GROUP, LLP VS I3 BRANDS, INC.
-
Case No.
20STCP03186
-
Hearing
Dec 03, 2020
-
Judge
Hon. Yolanda Orozco
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Upon presentation of documentation that the Raven obtained relief from the stay, the Court ssues the following order: Petitioners Raven Asset-Based Opportunity Fund II, LP and Raven Asset-Based Opportunity Fund III LP’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. The Court notes there was no opposition filed to the petition to confirm. ANALYSIS: A petition to confirm arbitration award may be brought per CCP §§1285 and 1285.4.
-
Name
GREEN-LIGHT INT'L LLC., VS RAVEN ASSET-BASED OPPORTUNITY
-
Case No.
SS026212
-
Hearing
Jul 28, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Lisa Hart Cole
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Hearing On Petitioners Petition To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 PETITIONER MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., DOMINICK MUSSO Petition To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 -- GRANT, NO OPPOSITION FILED. (302/REQ)
-
Name
MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. ET AL VS. JANET C. KELLEY
-
Case No.
CPF04504254
-
Hearing
Jul 20, 2004
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
PLT Swift Financial, LLC Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Plaintiff Swift Financial, LLC as servicing agent for WebBank, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, filed a “Complaint” to (1) confirm arbitration and (2) set aside fraudulent transfer. The first cause of action seeks to confirm the arbitration award pursuant to CPP §1285 et seq. The procedure by which the prevailing party obtains an enforceable judgment is a petition to confirm the award. [CCP § 1286; 9 USC § 9; see Loeb v.
-
Name
SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC VS. BADA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
-
Case No.
30-2020-01168884
-
Hearing
Feb 25, 2021
-
Judge
Hon. Layne H. MELZER
-
County
Orange County, CA
MOTION To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Pursuant To Ccp 1285 Et Seq. PETITIONER KEITH JOHN RYAN, MOTION To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Pursuant To Ccp 1285 Et Seq. GRANTED, NO OPPOSITION FILED.(302/REQ/JU)
-
Name
KEITH JOHN RYAN VS. MICHAEL EMBAYE ET AL
-
Case No.
CPF03502604
-
Hearing
Apr 10, 2003
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Notice Of Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp Secitons 1285 PETITIONER MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC., JULIA WAN, Notice Of Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp Secitons 1285 GRANT-NO OPPOSITION FILED.(302/REQ/JU)
-
Name
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH, INC. ET AL VS. KUI QUAN ZOE ZHAO
-
Case No.
CPF03503012
-
Hearing
Jun 25, 2003
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Proc. §1285, any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm the award. If the award is confirmed, judgment shall be entered in conformity therewith. Id. §1287.4. Petitioner properly moved under §1285 for confirmation of the award. As there is no opposition, there is no basis for the court to decline to confirm the arbitration award and enter judgment. GRANTED.
-
Name
GURSEY SCHNEIDER LLP VS RICHARD MACDONALD
-
Case No.
22SMCP00305
-
Hearing
Aug 03, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Once a petition to confirm an award is filed, the superior court must select one of only four courses of action: it may confirm the award, correct and confirm it, vacate it, or dismiss the petition.¿( EHM Productions, Inc. v. Starline Tours of Hollywood, Inc. ¿(2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 1058, 1063.)¿ III. DISCUSSION Petitioner moves to confirm an Arbitration Award rendered on September 10, 2025 against Respondents.
-
Name
FORWARD FINANCING LLC VS IDA DEVELOPMENT INC., ET AL.
-
Case No.
25STCP03683
-
Hearing
Mar 19, 2026
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD IS GRANTED. Background On July 27, 2020, Petitioners Daniel Stein and Phil McGarr filed the instant action to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award, naming as Respondent Jerred Kiloh. Legal Standard Per CCP § 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
DAGMAR SOLNICKA, AN INDIVIDUAL VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, A PUBLIC ENTITY
-
Case No.
20STCV02373
-
Hearing
Oct 06, 2020
-
Judge
Hon. Yolanda Orozco
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD IS GRANTED. Background On July 27, 2020, Petitioners Daniel Stein and Phil McGarr filed the instant action to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award, naming as Respondent Jerred Kiloh. Legal Standard Per CCP § 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
DANIEL STEIN, ET AL. VS JERRED KILOH
-
Case No.
20STCP02373
-
Hearing
Oct 06, 2020
-
Judge
Hon. Yolanda Orozco
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Ntc Of Hrg On Pet To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 And For Entry Of Judgment PETITIONER CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., A CORP.PETITION To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 And For Entry Of Judgment GRANT-NO OPPOSITION FILED.(302/REQ/JU)
-
Name
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., A CORP. ET AL VS. KRISTINA KOSCHARA ET AL
-
Case No.
CPF03502332
-
Hearing
Apr 03, 2003
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Legal Standard Per CCP § 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”
-
Name
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC VS VERONIKA VOSS
-
Case No.
20STCP00334
-
Hearing
Jan 05, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Henseon (Vanek) Superior Court Case No. 24CECG01181 Hearing Date: May 23, 2024 (Dept. 503) Motion: Petitioner Tamiyasu, Smith, Horn & Braun’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Tentative Ruling: To grant. (Code Civ. Proc., §1285.) Explanation: Applicable Law: Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm the award.
-
Name
TAMIYASU, SMITH, HORN & BRAUN VS. KAREE HENSON (VANEK)
-
Case No.
24CECG01181
-
Hearing
May 23, 2024
-
County
Fresno County, CA
.: BS 167225 Hearing Date: April 29, 2017 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: petition to confirm arbitration award. The Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is DENIED without prejudice. Petitioner should address at the hearing a schedule for a hearing on an amended petition. Discussion Confirmation of Arbitration Award California Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, et seq. governs petitions to confirm an arbitration award.
-
Name
S ROGER ROMBRO ET AL VS LARRY D TERRILL
-
Case No.
BS167225
-
Hearing
Apr 28, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Gail Ruderman Feuer
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Hearing On Petitioners' Petititon To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp. 1285 SET FOR HEARING ON MAY 4, 2006 PETITIONER MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., PHILIPP WEISSKOPF'S PetitiON To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp. 1285 IS GRANTED, NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/REQ)
-
Name
MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. ET AL VS. CHRIS LADEN
-
Case No.
CPF06506144
-
Hearing
May 04, 2006
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Notice Of Hearing On Petitioners' Petititon To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp. 1285 SET FOR HEARING ON MAY 4, 2006 PETITIONER MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., MICHAEL MANNO, GARY GORMAN'S Petititon To Confirm The Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp. 1285 IS GRANTED, NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/REQ)
-
Name
MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. ET AL VS. JOE H ARMSTRONG
-
Case No.
CPF06506142
-
Hearing
May 04, 2006
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
On June 30, 2022, the parties stipulated to arbitration and the matter was stayed. On February 5, 2025, Defendant filed a petition to confirm arbitration award. Instant Pleading Defendant moves to confirm arbitration award. Decision Defendants motion to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED. Discussion Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 states that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
ESSIE PHILLIPS VS PLATINUM SECURITY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
-
Case No.
22STCV01730
-
Hearing
Apr 02, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
MARK GOMEZ, ET AL. VS GEORQE PANOUSSIS
-
Case No.
23STCP02282
-
Hearing
Oct 03, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Legal Standard Per CCP § 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”
-
Name
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, LLC, ET AL. VS GEORGE SCRIBNER, ET AL.
-
Case No.
19STCP04377
-
Hearing
Nov 14, 2019
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
The parties stipulated to submit the matter to binding arbitration. Respondent Coast Packing Company, Inc. moves to confirm the arbitration award. TENTATIVE RULING Defendant Coast Packing Company, Incs petition to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED. ANALYSIS Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
LAURA CRIBBS VS COAST PACKING COMPANY
-
Case No.
18STCV00175
-
Hearing
Dec 01, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Motion And Motion And Petition [Under Ccp 1285, Et Sq.] Of Defts To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award; Set for hearing on Thursday, June 18, 2009, line 2, DEFENDANTS PACIFIC LAPAROSCOPY, JOHN RABKIN, ROBERT RABKIN, ROSSI, PA-C, MICHAEL Petition [Under CCP 1285, Et Sq.] To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award IS GRANTED. NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/HEK)
-
Name
CHERYL HOLLAND-GIANNI ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL
-
Case No.
CGC04429730
-
Hearing
Jun 18, 2009
-
Judge
Hon. HAROLD E. KAHN
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Ntc Of Hrg On Pet To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 And For Entry Of Judgment PETITIONER CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., A CORP. Ntc Of Hrg On Pet To Confirm Arbitration Award Pursuant To Ccp 1285 And For Entry Of Judgment GRANT, NO OPPOSITION FILED, IF MOVANT PROVIDES PROOF OF SERVICE, OTHERWISE, OFF CALENDAR.(302/REQ/JU)
-
Name
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., A CORP. ET AL VS. KRISTINA KOSCHARA ET AL
-
Case No.
CPF03502332
-
Hearing
Mar 06, 2003
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
On September 4, 2026, Petitioner filed a petition to confirm arbitration award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1285 – 1288.8. Respondent was served on September 20, 2026. There is no response in the Court file. “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
HEDBERG, KENNETH R VS KHAMIS, ARTHUR
-
Case No.
CV-26-008870
-
Hearing
Oct 15, 2026
-
County
Stanislaus County, CA
On September 4, 2026, Petitioner filed a petition to confirm arbitration award pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1285 – 1288.8. Respondent was served on September 20, 2026. There is no response in the Court file. “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
HEDBERG, KENNETH R VS KHAMIS, ARTHUR
-
Case No.
CV-26-008870
-
Hearing
Oct 21, 2026
-
County
Stanislaus County, CA
Proc. § 1285 provides, in pertinent part, that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (CCP § 1285.) On May 7, 2025, a binding arbitration award was entered in favor of Petitioner and against Respondent for the total sum of $47,830.58. (Horn Decl. ¶ 8; Exh. 2 [order].)
-
Name
STEVEN J. HORN VS MARIA ELENA STOFFEL
-
Case No.
25VECP00382
-
Hearing
Nov 15, 2025
-
Judge
6/18/2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc. § 1285 provides, in pertinent part, that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (CCP § 1285.) On May 7, 2025, a binding arbitration award was entered in favor of Petitioner and against Respondent for the total sum of $47,830.58. (Horn Decl. ¶ 8; Exh. 2 [order].)
-
Name
STEVEN J. HORN VS MARIA ELENA STOFFEL
-
Case No.
25VECP00382
-
Hearing
Nov 17, 2025
-
Judge
6/18/2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Ntc Of Hearing On Petitioners' Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Thereon Pursuant To C.C.P. 1285, 1286 And 1287.4 ON CALENDAR FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 2006. PETITIONERS MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. AND RONNIE HOUSTON'S Petitioners' Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award And Enter Judgment Thereon Pursuant To C.C.P. 1285, 1286 And 1287.4. GRANT CONFIRMATION. Prevailing party to prepare order. =(302/REQ/HE)
-
Name
MORGAN STANLEY DW INC ET AL VS. MARGARET JAN KEMP IRA ROLLOVER
-
Case No.
CPF06506234
-
Hearing
Aug 28, 2006
-
Judge
Hon. RONALD E. QUIDACHAY
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Discussion Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 states that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
TODD TOTMAN VS RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, ET AL.
-
Case No.
19STCV46273
-
Hearing
Jul 10, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award [Ccp 1285 Et Seq.] And Notice Of Rescheduling Of Previously Scheduled Hearing (Lr 8.2b(3)) Matter on calendar for Wednesday, September 11, 2013, Line 5, PETITIONERs NOVELL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LP and ALEX NOVELL's Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award [CCP 1285 Et Seq.] And Notice Of Rescheduling Of Previously Scheduled Hearing (LR 8.2b(3)). Hearing required.
-
Name
NOVELL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LP ET AL VS. ELMIRA NAZHMUDINOVA, TRUSTEE OF ET AL
-
Case No.
CPF13513080
-
Hearing
Sep 11, 2013
-
Judge
Hon. MARLA J. MILLER
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Sawaed, et al. 21STCP01246 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285) TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Jackie Jackson’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 28, 2021 AT 10:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. ANALYSIS: On May 22, 2020, an Arbitration Award was issued in favor of Jackie Jackson (“Petitioner”) and against Sawaed H. Sawaed (“Respondent Sawaed”) and Sawaed, Inc.
-
Name
JACKIE JACKSON VS SAWAED H SAWAED
-
Case No.
21STCP01246
-
Hearing
Aug 26, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Sawaed, et al. 21STCP01246 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285) TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Jackie Jacksons Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is DISMISSED. ANALYSIS: On May 22, 2020, an Arbitration Award was issued in favor of Jackie Jackson (Petitioner) and against Sawaed H. Sawaed (Respondent Sawaed) and Sawaed, Inc. (Respondent Sawaed, Inc.)
-
Name
JACKIE JACKSON VS SAWAED H SAWAED
-
Case No.
21STCP01246
-
Hearing
Oct 28, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
The parties attended binding arbitration and Plaintiff was awarded $1,000 in fees for the five days she represented Defendants Heredia and Castellon. Defendant’s demurrer is a misguided attempt to confirm the arbitration award without filing the proper petition under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, which provides, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
AZIMI VS. ROMERO
-
Case No.
30-2019-01102672
-
Hearing
May 01, 2021
-
Judge
Hon. James L. CRANDALL
-
County
Orange County, CA
CCP § 1285 et seq. set out the procedures for the Court to confirm arbitration awards as judgment; there is no requirement that a summons be served on Respondent. On such a petition to confirm an arbitration award, Petitioner need not serve Respondent with a summons, and the Court need not acquire personal jurisdiction over Petitioner by way of service of the summons in order to properly confirm the arbitration award.
-
Name
WORLDWIDE ASSET PURCHASING LLC VS PABALATE, CHARLEENA G
-
Case No.
08CG1132
-
Hearing
Sep 25, 2018
-
Judge
Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Motion: Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Tentative Ruling: To deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award, without prejudice. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285, et seq.) Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
W. DAVID COWIN V. EDWARD CHATOIAN
-
Case No.
17CECG02009
-
Hearing
Aug 07, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Alan Simpson
-
County
Fresno County, CA
-
Type
Administrative
-
Sub Type
Enforcement
Petitioner must submit a copy of the arbitration agreement or set forth its material terms in accordance with CCP §1285. ANALYSIS: A petition to confirm arbitration award may be brought per CCP §§1285 and 1285.4. CCP §1285.4 requires (1) a copy of the written arbitration agreement or terms thereof set forth in petition and (2) the arbitrator’s name, and (3) a copy of the award.
-
Name
JOSHUA ERIC HESS VS LISA BENYA, ET AL.,
-
Case No.
SS026124
-
Hearing
Jan 25, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Lisa Hart Cole
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Hearing On Petition And Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award [C.C.P. Sec. 1285] Set for hearing on Monday, September 12, 2016, Line 2, PETITIONER GIOVANNI NOCERINO'S Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award [C.C.P. Sec. 1285]. Petitioner Giovanni Nocerino's Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award is granted. No opposition was filed.
-
Name
GIOVANNI NOCERINO VS. MEDIA LARIO USA INC. ET AL
-
Case No.
CPF16515207
-
Hearing
Sep 12, 2016
-
Judge
Hon. HAROLD E. KAHN
-
County
San Francisco County, CA
Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”
-
Name
LISA FOSTER VS. FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
-
Case No.
18CECG01122
-
Hearing
Jul 27, 2022
-
County
Fresno County, CA
Instant Pleading Defendant moves to confirm an arbitration award. Decision Defendants motion to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED. Discussion Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 states that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
HSK PROPERTIES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL. VS ABRAM ZUKOR, AS TRUSTEE OF THE EUGENE LOUIS TROPE INTER VIVOS TRUST, DATED MAY 16, 2001 AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, ET AL.
-
Case No.
21STCV37866
-
Hearing
May 15, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ANALYSIS Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Petitioner moves for confirmation of arbitration award. Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. CCP § 1285.
-
Name
E&R VENTURE PARTNERS LLC VS MICHAEL VISCUSO
-
Case No.
BS167468
-
Hearing
Jan 24, 2018
-
Judge
Hon. Randolph M. Hammock
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
MARK GOMEZ, ET AL. VS GEORQE PANOUSSIS
-
Case No.
23STCP02282
-
Hearing
Jul 12, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant's Petition to Lift Stay and Confirm Arbitration Award, and Plaintiff's Cross-Petition to Vacate the Award, are both CONTINUED to August 22, 2024 at 3:00 p.m. in Department 15. By no later than August 2, 2024, Defendant shall deliver, directly to Department 15, courtesy copies of its (1) Opposition to Vacate Arbitration Award and (2) Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Confirm Award, as required by Alameda County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 3.30(c).
-
Name
LINDEROTH VS RELOLA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION QUALIFIED T...
-
Case No.
22CV009972
-
Hearing
Aug 01, 2024
-
County
Alameda County, CA
Explanation: Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other person bound by the arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc., §1285.)
-
Name
BRIAN FOLLAND VS. DENNA ROGERS
-
Case No.
21CECG01468
-
Hearing
Jul 10, 2024
-
County
Fresno County, CA
Plaintiff Pineapple Implementation Programs petition to confirm arbitration award is GRANTED. ANALYSIS Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
PINEAPPLE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM, LLC VS PINEAPPLE VENTURES, INC.
-
Case No.
23STCP00950
-
Hearing
Jul 13, 2023
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
(Stip and Order, 11/21/23) Defendant/Cross-Complainant filed the instant Motion to Confirm Appraisal Award on August 15, 2024. No opposition has been filed to date. Legal Standard Confirmation of the arbitration award may be sought in the manner provided in Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, et seq. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Case No.
21STLC00117
-
Hearing
Oct 28, 2024
-
Judge
Echo Dawn Ryan
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
.: 23STCP04122 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. August 29, 2024 On November 8, 2023, Petitioner Stris & Maher LLP filed a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. A party may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate an arbitration award, and a response to a petition may request that the court dismiss the petition or confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1285, 1285.2.)
-
Name
STRIS & MAHER LLP VS TONY DIAB, ET AL.
-
Case No.
23STCP04122
-
Hearing
Aug 29, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Aragaki, FClarb, Esq., remotely via Zoom, resulting in a final April 22, 2022 Award of $352,863.90 in favor of Petitioner Global Advance, Inc. Petitioner Global Advance, Inc. now brings the instant Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. The Petition is unopposed. Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award: GRANTED. Legal Standard : Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. (Code Civ.
-
Name
GLOBAL ADVANCE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS ROGERSON AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
-
Case No.
21STCV06692
-
Hearing
Jun 21, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
On October 18, 2021, the Court granted the parties stipulation to stay this action pending arbitration. On July 24, 2024, Defendant filed this petition to confirm the arbitration award. Instant Pleading Defendant petitions to confirm the arbitration award. Decision Defendants petition is GRANTED. Discussion Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 states that [a]ny party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
TARA TERRY, AN INDIVIDUAL VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
-
Case No.
21STCV23445
-
Hearing
Aug 29, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff moves to confirm an arbitration award. TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff moves to confirm an arbitration award, issued on January 15, 2025. Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.)
-
Name
DIOUANA MATTHEWS VS DRAY ALLIANCE, INC.
-
Case No.
23STCV00457
-
Hearing
Feb 28, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Petitioner seeks an order confirming the arbitration award and entering judgment accordingly, with interest from 1/21/15 at the statutory rate. Opposition: None. Discussion: Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. CCP § 1285.
-
Name
OILFIELD ELECTRIC VS RMA LAND
-
Case No.
56-2015-00474642-CU-PA-VTA
-
Hearing
Jan 19, 2016
-
Judge
Hon. John Nguyen
-
County
Ventura County, CA
.: 25STCP02121 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD MOVING PARTY : Petitioner Ariana Olive, in pro per RESPONDING PARTY(S) : No response on eCourt as of 09/30/25 TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Ariana Olive seeks to confirm an arbitration award. Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.)
-
Name
ARIANA OLIVE VS MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
-
Case No.
25STCP02121
-
Hearing
Oct 03, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
ANALYSIS Petition To Confirm Arbitration Award Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.) If a petition or response under this chapter is duly served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, whether rendered in this state or another state, unless in accordance with this chapter it corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding. (Code Civ.
-
Name
CESAR GONZALEZ VS OC AUTO EXCHANGE, ET AL.
-
Case No.
22STCP00907
-
Hearing
May 10, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Discussion Plaintiff moves to confirm the parties arbitration award (the Award) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, et seq. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE A. ALMODOVAR, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VS JOSE NOLBERTO ALMAGER
-
Case No.
19STLC09795
-
Hearing
Apr 26, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Conclusion Petitioner Meyer, Olson, Lowy, Meyers, LLPs Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED.
-
Name
MEYER, OLSON, LOWY & MEYERS, LLP VS ERIK C. OH
-
Case No.
22STCP04025
-
Hearing
Nov 08, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Conclusion Petitioner Meyer, Olson, Lowy, Meyers, LLPs Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award is DENIED without prejudice.
-
Name
MEYER, OLSON, LOWY & MEYERS, LLP VS ERIK C. OH
-
Case No.
22STCP04025
-
Hearing
Oct 29, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD (CCP § 1285, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Forward Financing, LLCs Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is DISMISSED. ANALYSIS: On February 14, 2024, Petitioner Forward Financing, LLC (Petitioner) filed the instant Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (the Petition) against Respondent Bianca Christopher (Respondent).
-
Name
FORWARD FINANCING LLC VS BIANCA CHRISTOPHER
-
Case No.
24STCP00466
-
Hearing
Oct 22, 2024
-
Judge
Echo Dawn Ryan
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Discussion Petitioner moves to confirm the arbitration award under Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, et seq., which provides: Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
COLLECTION CONSULTANTS OF CALIFORNIA VS LILLIE SADAT KHARRAZI
-
Case No.
21STCP03589
-
Hearing
Apr 14, 2022
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Legal Standard Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
DANIEL VERGARA VS GABRIEL OLIN
-
Case No.
24STCP01018
-
Hearing
Nov 05, 2024
-
Judge
Echo Dawn Ryan
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
HEARING ON PETITIONER RE: CVME2511493 LOPEZ vs SHAMONIN ARBITRATION AWARD Tentative Ruling: Court to confirm the Arbitration award. Code of Civil Procedure 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
CVME2511493
-
Case No.
CVME2511493
-
Hearing
Nov 30, 2025
-
County
Riverside County, CA
HEARING ON PETITIONER RE: CVME2511493 LOPEZ vs SHAMONIN ARBITRATION AWARD Tentative Ruling: Court to confirm the Arbitration award. Code of Civil Procedure 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
CVME2511493
-
Case No.
CVME2511493
-
Hearing
Nov 28, 2025
-
County
Riverside County, CA
HEARING ON PETITIONER RE: CVME2511493 LOPEZ vs SHAMONIN ARBITRATION AWARD Tentative Ruling: Court to confirm the Arbitration award. Code of Civil Procedure 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
CVME2511493
-
Case No.
CVME2511493
-
Hearing
Nov 29, 2025
-
County
Riverside County, CA
HEARING ON PETITIONER RE: CVME2511493 LOPEZ vs SHAMONIN ARBITRATION AWARD Tentative Ruling: Court to confirm the Arbitration award. Code of Civil Procedure 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
CVME2511493
-
Case No.
CVME2511493
-
Hearing
Dec 01, 2025
-
County
Riverside County, CA
HEARING ON PETITIONER RE: CVME2511493 LOPEZ vs SHAMONIN ARBITRATION AWARD Tentative Ruling: Court to confirm the Arbitration award. Code of Civil Procedure 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
CVME2511493
-
Case No.
CVME2511493
-
Hearing
Nov 27, 2025
-
County
Riverside County, CA
Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1285, Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.
-
Name
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM P GLAVIN APC, ET AL. VS RONALD KIM
-
Case No.
21STCP02272
-
Hearing
Nov 18, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
(WGAW) commenced this action by filing the instant Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award (the Petition) against Respondents Red Guerilla Entertainment, LLC (Red Guerilla), Eric Garnes (Garnes) and Rhyan L. Shaw (Shaw) (together, Respondents). II. LEGAL STANDARD Any party to an arbitration award may petition the court to confirm, correct, or vacate the award. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.)
-
Name
WRITER'S GUILD OF AMERICA, WEST, INC. VS RED GUERILLA ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, ET AL.
-
Case No.
25STCP04219
-
Hearing
Jan 16, 2026
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
(Dept. 402) Motion: Petitions to Confirm Partial Final Arbitration Award and Partial Final Award for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Tentative Ruling: To grant the petitions to confirm the partial final arbitration award and award of attorney’s fees and costs, and to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the awards. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1285, et seq.)
-
Name
COELHO V. COELHO
-
Case No.
15CECG00543
-
Hearing
Nov 13, 2017
-
Judge
Hon. Jeff Hamilton
-
County
Fresno County, CA
-
Type
Other
-
Sub Type
Intellectual Property
.: BS171887 Hearing Date: April 30, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: (1) petition to confirm arbitration award (2) RESPONDENT’S petition to vacate THE arbitration award IN RESPONSE DISCUSSION Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. (CCP § 1285.) “Except for the very limited grounds set forth in section 1286.2 and 1286.6, awards are immune from judicial review.” (Cinel v. Christopher (2012) 203 Cal.
-
Name
WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC VS JOSEPH MANUEL FOCIL
-
Case No.
BS171887
-
Hearing
Apr 30, 2018
-
Judge
Hon. Daniel S. Murphy
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Petition Confirm Arbitration Petition Confirm Arbitration Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Alan Fenton For Defendant: No opposition filed Ruling: GRANTED; there is a proposed order in the file that the Court will sign. Background: This Petition to confirm an arbitration award in this case was filed 2/11/19 by Alan Fenton for Plaintiff Bryn Martin following binding arbitration and served on Petitioner on 01/19/2019.
-
Name
BRYN MARTIN V. ALL STATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY
-
Case No.
18CV02755
-
Hearing
Mar 05, 2019
-
County
Santa Barbara County, CA
DISCUSSION Petitioner Swift Financial, LLC moves this court for an order granting the petition to confirm arbitration award on the grounds that the Defendant has been properly served with the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and has not timely responded to said Petition. Swift Financial makes this petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Name
SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC, AS SERVICING AGENT FOR WEBBANK VS MILKY WAY CATERING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
-
Case No.
23VECP00397
-
Hearing
Feb 13, 2024
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
DISCUSSION Petitioner Swift Financial, LLC moves this court for an order granting the petition to confirm arbitration award on the grounds that the Defendant has been properly served with the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and has not timely responded to said Petition. Swift Financial makes this petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1285. Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.
-
Case No.
23VECP00397
-
Hearing
Oct 05, 2023
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Procedural Requirements Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285 provides: “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP VS SYMPHONY GLO
-
Case No.
BS173904
-
Hearing
Jan 11, 2019
-
Judge
Hon. Elizabeth R. Feffer
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Legal Standard Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.)
-
Name
WESTLAKE DIRECT, LLC VS DIRAHN D. WILLIAMS
-
Case No.
24STCP01366
-
Hearing
Sep 26, 2024
-
Judge
Echo Dawn Ryan
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
( Consent Award, Page 2, Petition, Exh. 1.) All the requirements for confirmation of the arbitration award have been satisfied. The petition to confirm the Arbitration Award is GRANTED.
-
Name
TRILLER LEGACY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS TRILLER HOLD CO, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, F/K/A TRILLER ACQUISITION, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMP
-
Case No.
25STCP02277
-
Hearing
Sep 04, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
Elk Management, LLC Plaintiff Alex-Handrah Aimes Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Plaintiff Alex-Handrah Aime petitions to confirm an arbitration award against Defendant Elk Management, LLC. There was no opposition filed to the petition. The petition meets all requirements under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1285 through 1290.4. Plaintiff shows valid grounds to confirm the arbitration award attached to the petition.
-
Name
ALEX-HANDRAH AIME VS ELK MANAGEMENT, LLC
-
Case No.
24STCV31293
-
Hearing
Jun 01, 2026
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
The court may not vacate an award unless & [¶] [a] petition or response requesting that the award be vacated has been duly served or filed &. (CCP, § 1286.4, subd. (a).) A response seeking to correct and confirm or vacate an arbitration award must be served and filed within ten days of service of a petition to confirm that same arbitration award, unless the timeframe is extended by agreement of the parties or for good cause, by order of the court.
-
Name
KAREN COMBA VS TALENT SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC
-
Case No.
25STCP03443
-
Hearing
Dec 02, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
The court may not vacate an award unless & [¶] [a] petition or response requesting that the award be vacated has been duly served or filed &. (CCP, § 1286.4, subd. (a).) A response seeking to correct and confirm or vacate an arbitration award must be served and filed within ten days of service of a petition to confirm that same arbitration award, unless the timeframe is extended by agreement of the parties or for good cause, by order of the court.
-
Name
THE LOS ANGELES RAMS, LLC VS PRO-CAL LIGHTING, INC.
-
Case No.
25STCP01983
-
Hearing
Dec 18, 2025
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
DISCUSSION Petitioner Swift Financial, LLC moves this court for an order granting the petition to confirm arbitration award on the grounds that the defendant has been properly served with the petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and has not timely responded to said Petition. Swift Financial makes this petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1285. “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.”
-
Name
SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC AS SERVICING AGENT FOR WEBBANK VS HEAVEN HOME HEALTH CARE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
-
Case No.
20VECP00385
-
Hearing
Apr 05, 2021
-
County
Los Angeles County, CA
