<< Previous Rule [ Back to Title Index ] Next Rule >> | Printer-friendly version of this page 2024 California Rules of Court
Standard 10.5. The role of the judiciary in the community
(a) Community outreach an official judicial function
Judicial participation in community outreach activities should be considered an official judicial function to promote public understanding of and confidence in the administration of justice. This function should be performed in a manner consistent with the California Code of Judicial Ethics.
(Subd (a) lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of unlettered subdivision effective April 1, 1999.)
(b) Encouraged outreach activities
The judiciary is encouraged to:
(1) Provide active leadership within the community in identifying and resolving issues of access to justice within the court system;
(2) Develop local education programs for the public designed to increase public understanding of the court system;
(3) Create local mechanisms for obtaining information from the public about how the court system may be more responsive to the public's needs;
(4) Serve as guest speakers, during or after normal court hours, to address local civic, educational, business, and charitable groups that have an interest in understanding the court system but do not espouse a particular political agenda with which it would be inappropriate for a judicial officer to be associated; and
(5) Take an active part in the life of the community where the participation of the judiciary will serve to increase public understanding and promote public confidence in the integrity of the court system.
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
continued to 7/27/21. the examiner is ready to set this matter for hearing, and the order is lodged, but it has the original language in section 10.5 re attorney fees, not the modified language agreed to. please provide an updated order by tuesday, 7/20/21.
IN THE MATTER OF THE THE SOPHIE VERGARA SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST TRUST
PTR18302465
Jul 20, 2021
SANDRA HILTON
San Francisco County, CA
Section 10.5 of the Amended and Restated Platform License Agreement states a party may assign the agreement without the other party's consent but does not state assignment is automatic upon acquisition. If it can do so in good faith, Loytr is granted twenty days leave to amend to cure this deficiency. The demurrer as to the fourth cause of action is sustained without leave to amend because unjust enrichment is not recognized as a separate cause of action in California.
LOYTR, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS. TINYCO, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL
CGC17558639
Jul 11, 2017
San Francisco County, CA
Here, Defendant’s position that section 529’s requirement of an undertaking applies is based on the argument that the parties’ agreement to waive bond, found in Section 10.5 of their Consulting Agreement, does not apply to the Preliminary Injunction because the injunction
ECLIPZ.10, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS. SDSE NETWORKS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL
21-CIV-06207
Aug 14, 2022
HONORABLE V. RAYMOND SWOPE
San Mateo County, CA
Article Ten, Section 10.5 titled “Compensation” – Section 10.5 (a) is to be deleted in its entirety as that section does not apply to this court supervised trust. 9. Article Ten, Section 10.8 titled, “Resignation or Removal of Directed Trustee” – this section is to make clear that the court must approve changes in trustee. 10. Article Thirteen, Section 13.1 titled, “Donations” – This section allowing donations to the Non Profit is to be deleted in its entirety.
ERIKA SALDANA ET AL VS RALPH REFUGIO GARCIA
BC605449
Aug 30, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Auto
Plaintiff is also entitled to recover its attorneys fees pursuant to Article 10, section 10.5, and Article 5, section 5.8.1 of the written Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. (Motion, Medioni Decl., Exh. D, §§ 10.5 and 5.8.1.) Calculation of Attorneys Fees Plaintiff submits the declaration of its attorney, Daniel Medioni (Medioni), in support of its request for attorneys fees in the amount of $6,275.00. Medionis hourly rate for this matter was $300.00.
(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)
LAM12A08313
Dec 23, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Dec 24, 2018
San Francisco County
San Francisco County, CA
TRUST (petition for order authorizing purchase of real property, purchase of an accessible vehicle, payment of care giver wages and approving attorneys' fees)
Probate
Trusts
Mar 02, 2012
Trial Verdict
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Commercial
Breach of Contract
Nov 17, 2021
Dismissal
Hon. Swope, V
Superior
San Mateo County, CA
Standard 8.1. Memorandum opinions
7 pages
1 KERIANNE R. STEELE, Bar No. 250897 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 2 A Professional Corporation 1375 55th Street 3 Emeryville, California 94608 Telephone (510) 337-1001 4 Fax (510) 337-1023 E-Mail: courtnotices@unioncounsel.net 5 ksteele@union…
9 pages
Com NY DAM PB WN RNY Se Se Be Be BP Be Be ee =~ SoOowM YU AA PHY NH = TS 22 Robert Simpson, SBN 67556 Crystal M. Gaudette, SBN 247712 Phil K. Rucker, SBN 281318 KENNEDY, ARCHER & GIFFEN Attorneys at Law 24591 Silver Cloud Court, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 Telephone (831) 373-7500 Facsimile (831) 373-7555 rsimpson@kaglaw.net /cgaudette@kaglaw.net prucker@kaglaw.net Attorneys for Defendant JAM CITY, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco …
May 04, 2017
15 pages
SFO wme ND RB YN Robert Simpson, SBN 67556 Crystal M. Gaudette, SBN 247712 Asha R. Subas, SBN 262528 Phil K. Rucker, SBN 281318 KENNEDY, ARCHER & GIFFEN Attorneys at Law 24591 Silver Cloud Court, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 Telephone (831) 373-7500 Facsimile (831) 373-7555 rsimpson@kaglaw.net /cgaudette@kaglaw.net asubas@kaglaw.net / prucker@kaglaw.net Attorneys for Defendant JAM CITY, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 06/13/2017 Cler…
May 04, 2017
18 pages
Co ONIN DH HA BF WN Robert Simpson, SBN 67556 Crystal M. Gaudette, SBN 247712 Phil K. Rucker, SBN 281318 KENNEDY, ARCHER & GIFFEN Attorneys at Law 24591 Silver Cloud Court, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940 Telephone (831) 373-7500 Facsimile (831) 373-7555 rsimpson@kaglaw.net /egaudette@kaglaw.net prucker@kaglaw.net Attorneys for Defendant JAM CITY, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of Catifornia, County of San Francisco 11/15/2017 Clerk of the Court BY: SANDRA SCHIRO Deputy Cle…
May 04, 2017
24 pages
1 BROWN RUDNICK LLP RONALD RUS, #67369 2 rrus@brownrudnick.com LEO J. PRESIADO, #166721 3 lpresiado@brownrudnick.com SAMUEL MONIZ, #313274 4 smoniz@brownrudnick.com FRANKLIN S. KRBECHEK, #322170 5 fkrbechek@brownrudnick.com 2211 Michelson Drive, 7th Floor …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
