Any contractor or installer of burglar bars shall provide the owner of the residential dwelling the warning information required pursuant to section 4.3 prior to installing burglar bars.
Notes
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 19 , § 4.5 Note: Authority cited: Section 13113.9, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 13113.9, Health and Safety Code.
1. New section filed 7-2-98; operative 8-1-98 (Register 98, No. 27).
2. Amendment filed 1-12-2011; operative 1-12-2011 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2011, No. 2).
Nature of Proceedings: Petition for Probate of Will & Letters of Administration With Will Annexed Section 4.5 of the will waives the bond of any executor nominated in the will and the petitioner was not named in the will. A bond of $50,000 must be posted by petitioner. The matter will be pre approved and granted as prayed with the exception of the waiver of bond.
ESTATE OF ROSALIE P BIFANO
1337347
Jun 19, 2009
Santa Barbara County, CA
Here, Section 4.5 of the Guaranty, which is signed by Rosenberg, expressly states: “This Guaranty shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflicts of laws principles.... Any action to enforce this guaranty will be brought before the Rabbinical Council of California’s Bais Din, sitting in Los Angeles, California.” (Complaint, Ex. B.)
TWINMED LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS GARDENDALE SNF, LLC DBA GARDENDALE REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER , A NEW JERSEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
20NWCV00146
Dec 17, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
Deference is given to an Arbitrators Interpretation of a Contract and Remedies Fashioned There is no dispute that Section 4.5 of the subcontract expressly granted the Arbitration Panel the authority to determine liability and damages, including costs. The only limitation on allocating costs is set out in Section 6.1, which the Arbitration Panel interpreted as giving them the discretion to award arbitration costs but not internal costs. In Moshonov v.
FLUOR FLATIRON BALFOUR BEATTY DRAGADOS DBJV, AN UNINCORPORATED JOINT VENTURE VS ALSTOM TRANSPORT USA, INC.
23STCP01054
Jul 11, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
But section 4.5 requires parties to dismiss pending cross-complaints with prejudice within five days of the complaints dismissal. Defendant Mistry Engineering did not breach the agreement by initially refusing to dismiss its cross-complaint against the Moving Defendants because Plaintiff has not dismissed its complaint against Defendant Mistry Engineering. Thus, the court denies Moving Defendants motion to enforce the settlement.
THE LAAC CORP. VS STEWART, ROMBERGER & KITE, ET AL.
21STCV23325
Sep 19, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
The CEB treatise Practice Under the California Environmental Quality Act (Kosta and Zischke, 2d Ed. 2019) addresses whether an activity is a "project" under CEQA in section 4.5. Summarizing the case law, the Public Resources Code, and the CEQA guidelines, the authors note "two essential elements" to a "project:" 1. An activity that may cause a direct (or reasonably foreseeable indirect) physical environmental change. 2.
37-2023-00008265-CU-TT-CTL
Aug 11, 2023
San Diego County, CA
Jun 19, 2009
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara County, CA
May 17, 2001
Trial Verdict
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles County, CA
Other Compl-not Tort or Complex (General Jurisdiction)
§ 4.6 - Prohibited Installations
4 pages
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/10/2022 09:26 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk PETER C. SHERIDAN -State Bar No. 137267 psheridan@glaserweil.com ALEXANDER J. SUAREZ -State Bar No. 289044 asuarez@glaserweil.com GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPI…
Los Angeles County, CA
Aug 10, 2022
Other Promissory Note/Collections Case (General Jurisdiction)
24 pages
1 SULLIVAN HILL REZ & ENGEL, APLC Timothy C. Earl, SBN 174967 2 earl@sullivanhill.com Shailendra U. Kulkarni, SBN 304761 3 kulkarni@sullivanhill.com Alexander D. Wall, SBN 338820 4 wall@sullivanhill.com 600 B Street, 17th Floor 5 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: (619) 233-4100/Fax: (619) 231-4372 6 Attorneys for Cross-Complainant THIRD STREET NAPA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 FOR…
24 pages
I DocuSign Envelope ID: B380C87B-4863-4D4B-9BAB-34D8618324EE = oOo ON OHO FF WO DY OGDEN & FRICKS LLP JOHN W. FRICKS, SBN 150539 ROY E. OGDEN, SBN 126961 656 Santa Rosa Street, Suite 2B San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 544-5600 (805) 544-7700 (Fax) Attorneys for Defendants Hamish Marshall, Rodney Cegelski, Quiky Car Wash, LLC, Marshall Property Holdings, LLC, and Marshall Holdings, L.P. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ALEX PANANIDES, an individ…
Preview
163TPBO4266 FIRST CODICIL TO WILL OF QUEENIE KAZARIAN I, QUEENIE KAZARIAN, a resident of Los Angeles County, California, declare this to be the First Codicil to my Will dated May 26, 2002. FIRST: Subsection (a) of Section 2.1 on …
Jan 02, 2018
Under Court Supervision 11/16/2016
Los Angeles County, CA
Oct 17, 2016
Decedent's Estate (General Jurisdiction)
24 pages
DocuSign Envelope ID: B380C87B-4863-4D4B-9BAB-34D8618324EE ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California County of Santa Barbara …
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
