We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Leticia Rito -V- Daniel Cross Print

Case Last Refreshed: 1 month ago

Rito, Leticia, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Cross, Daniel David, in the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. This case was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Courts Superior with Shannon Suber presiding.

Case Details for Rito, Leticia v. Cross, Daniel David

Filing Date

June 21, 2024

Category

Dissolution W/O Minor Children

Last Refreshed

June 22, 2024

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

San Bernardino County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filing Court House

Superior

Parties for Rito, Leticia v. Cross, Daniel David

Plaintiffs

Rito, Leticia

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Cross, Daniel David

Other Parties

Pro Se (Attorney)

Case Events for Rito, Leticia v. Cross, Daniel David

Type Description
Docket Event Family Law Summons Issued - Original Filed in Court File
Docket Event Financial Statement (Simplified) Filed
Docket Event Community and Quasi Community Property Declaration Filed
Docket Event Certificate of Assignment Received
Docket Event Separate Property Declaration Filed
Docket Event Family Law Petition Filed
See all events

Related Content in San Bernardino County

Case

Selena Flores -v- Evany Hernanez Saenz Print
Jul 18, 2024 | Dina Issam Amani | Dissolution w/o Minor Children | Dissolution w/o Minor Children | FAMSB2404877

Case

Raina Rivera -v- Julian Rivera, Jr. Print
Jun 28, 2023 | Teresa S Bennett | Dissolution w/ Minor Children | Dissolution w/ Minor Children | FAMSB2303326

Case

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO vs. RAYSHAWN L AUSBIE Print
Dec 08, 2015 | Cecilia H Joo | Governmental Complaint to Establish Child Sppt/Health Ins | Governmental Complaint to Establish Child Sppt/Health Ins | CSKS1508608

Case

In re: Monica Kline Print
Jun 03, 2024 | James R Baxter | Petition for Change of Name | Petition for Change of Name | CIVBA2400326

Case

RIO RHODES -v- SANDRA BRYANT Print
Jul 15, 2024 | Christian Towns | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | FAMSB2404866

Case

Monica Wolfe -v- Jorge Ruiz Print
Jul 17, 2024 | Christian Towns | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | FAMSB2404906

Case

Andrea Gonzalez vs. Juan Alvarez Print
Jul 17, 2024 | Aruna P Rodrigo | Petition for Custody and Support of a Minor Child | Petition for Custody and Support of a Minor Child | FAMSB2404924

Case

Rosmery Dinalia Polanco -v- Jorge Alfredo Polanco Print
Jul 12, 2024 | David Tulcan | Dissolution w/o Minor Children | Dissolution w/o Minor Children | FAMSB2404918

Case

CHELSEA GRANGER -v- BRADY LOSER Print
Jul 17, 2024 | John Burdick | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | DV Prevention w/o Minor Children | FAMMB2400341

Ruling

2024CUPT025170 IN THE MATTER OF KAORI ARIEL KNUCKLES
Jul 17, 2024 | Jeffrey G. Bennett | OSC - Name Change | 2024CUPT025170
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Tentative Ruling 2024CUPT025170: IN THE MATTER OF KAORI ARIEL KNUCKLES 07/17/2024 in Department 21 OSC - Name Change The morning calendar in courtroom 21 will normally begin between 8:30 and 8:45 a.m. Please arrive at the courtroom no later than 8:30 a.m. The door will be opened before the calendar is called. The Court allows appearances by CourtCall but is not equipped for Zoom. If appearing by CourtCall, call in no later than 8:15 a.m. If you intend to appear by CourtCall, you must make arrangements with CourtCall by 4:00 p.m. the day before your scheduled hearing. Requests for approval of a CourtCall appearance made on the morning of the hearing will not be granted. No exceptions will be made. With respect to the tentative ruling below, no notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative ruling you can fax notice to Judge Riley's secretary, Ms. Sedillos at 805-289-8705, stating that you submit on the tentative. You may also email the Court at: Courtroom21@ventura.courts.ca.gov with all counsel copied on the email. Do not call in lieu of sending a fax or email. If you submit on the tentative without appearing and the opposing party appears, the hearing will be conducted in your absence. If you are the moving party and do not communicate to the Court that you submit on the tentative or you do not appear at the hearing, the Court may deny your motion irrespective of the tentative. Unless stated otherwise at the hearing, if a formal order is not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court. A "notice of ruling" in lieu of this procedure is not authorized. Tentative Ruling The Court GRANTS Petitioner’s Petition to change the name of her minor daughter. Analysis The Petition appears properly filled out and otherwise sufficient. On July 8, 2024, Petitioner filed proof of publication of the Court’s Order to Show Cause in the Thousand Oaks Acorn, as required by Code of Civil Procedure §1277(a)(2)(B) and the Court's May 28, 2024 OSC. Family Code §8617 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: 2024CUPT025170: IN THE MATTER OF KAORI ARIEL KNUCKLES “(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), the existing parent or parents of an adopted child are, from the time of the adoption, relieved of all parental duties towards, and all responsibility for, the adopted child, and have no right over the child. In the absence of any evidence indicating that both Kaori’s biological parents and Petitioner waived the termination of the biological parents rights/obligations upon adoption pursuant to §8617(b), the Court finds that Petitioner was not required to serve Kaori’s biological parents with a copy of the Order to Show Cause, and so grants the petition.

Ruling

2024CUPP019108 LEE ESTELLE GARRISON vs MACERICH MANAGEMENT, CO., et al.
Jul 19, 2024 | Ronda J. McKaig | Motion for Protective Order | 2024CUPP019108
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Tentative Ruling 2024CUPP019108: LEE ESTELLE GARRISON vs MACERICH MANAGEMENT, CO., et al. 07/19/2024 in Department 41 Motion for by Non-Party Tentative Rulings: The Court GRANTS Madeline Rana’s application to appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court GRANTS Non-party Apple Inc.’s motion for a protective order. The protective order shall be modified in a way that is limited to production of records by Apple. The Court makes the following changes to Apple’s proposed protective order: • Item 2 – Definitions. o Subparagraph (a), shall be modified to read: “Discovery Material” means all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated by Apple, Inc., in this case. o Subparagraph (d), shall be modified to read: “Producing Party” means Apple, Inc. • Item 3 – Computation of Time o This item shall be modified to read: The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order shall be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure. • Item 4 – Scope o Subparagraph (a), shall be modified to read: The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery Material governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof that might reveal Protected Material. • Item 8 – Discovery Materials Designated as “Confidential” o Subparagraph (b)(ii), shall be modified to read: (ii) The Receiving Party’s in-house counsel, such counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff; o Subparagraph (b)(x), shall be added and read: (x) The Receiving Party(ies). • Item 16 – Discovery from Experts or Consultants Item 16 shall be deleted. The proposed language goes beyond the scope of Apple’s motion. 2024CUPP019108: LEE ESTELLE GARRISON vs MACERICH MANAGEMENT, CO., et al. The protective order contains a mechanism by which designations can be challenged and the parties should follow those procedures going forward. The Court declines to rule on any proposed designations at this time. A revised protective order is to be submitted forthwith. Apple to give notice.

Ruling

IN THE MATTER OF: VICTORIA YEGIAZARYAN
Jul 15, 2024 | 24STCP01517
Case Number: 24STCP01517 Hearing Date: July 15, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.

Ruling

IN THE MATTER OF: JUNHAN CHO, ET AL.
Jul 15, 2024 | 24STCP01481
Case Number: 24STCP01481 Hearing Date: July 15, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.

Ruling

2024CUPT025317 IN THE MATTER OF: XOCHITL LIZBETH CASTRO FELIX
Jul 19, 2024 | Jeffrey G. Bennett | OSC - Name Change | 2024CUPT025317
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Tentative Ruling 2024CUPT025317: IN THE MATTER OF: XOCHITL LIZBETH CASTRO FELIX 07/19/2024 in Department 21 OSC - Name Change The morning calendar in courtroom 21 will normally begin between 8:30 and 8:45 a.m. Please arrive at the courtroom no later than 8:30 a.m. The door will be opened before the calendar is called. The Court allows appearances by CourtCall but is not equipped for Zoom. If appearing by CourtCall, call in no later than 8:15 a.m. If you intend to appear by CourtCall, you must make arrangements with CourtCall by 4:00 p.m. the day before your scheduled hearing. Requests for approval of a CourtCall appearance made on the morning of the hearing will not be granted. No exceptions will be made. With respect to the tentative ruling below, no notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative ruling you can fax notice to Judge Riley's secretary, Ms. Sedillos at 805-289-8705, stating that you submit on the tentative. You may also email the Court at: Courtroom21@ventura.courts.ca.gov with all counsel copied on the email. Do not call in lieu of sending a fax or email. If you submit on the tentative without appearing and the opposing party appears, the hearing will be conducted in your absence. If you are the moving party and do not communicate to the Court that you submit on the tentative or you do not appear at the hearing, the Court may deny your motion irrespective of the tentative. Unless stated otherwise at the hearing, if a formal order is not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court. A "notice of ruling" in lieu of this procedure is not authorized. Tentative Ruling The Court GRANTS the Petition for Change of Name. The Court finds all statutory requirements have been met and proceeds to confirm the spelling of the proposed name with Petitioner. A proof of publication was filed on June 27, 2024 Once the Court grants the Petition and signs the Decree Changing Name, a certified copy will need to be obtained from the Records Department, Room 218. A certified copy of the Decree will be needed to change the name on legal documents, including birth certificates, social security cards, and other government-issued identification such as passports or driver’s licenses.

Ruling

VARANI VS VARANI
Jul 18, 2024 | FL-23-000439
FL-23-000439 – VARANI VS VARANI Continued Hearing on Petitioner’s Request for Order re Attorney’s Fees, etc.—HEARING REQUIRED. Counsel shall meet and confer on all issues in good faith, and shall exchange any and all documents to be used for proof of any material fact other than impeachment.  (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.98.)

Ruling

City of Anderson vs. Krumins, et al.
Jul 19, 2024 | 23CV-0203032
CITY OF ANDERSON VS. KRUMINS, ET AL. Case Number: 23CV-0203032 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of the receivership and clean up of the property. On July 2, 2024, the Court granted the Receiver’s Ex Parte Application for Order to Respondents to Vacate the Receivership Property. The Ninth Report of the Receiver was filed on July 10, 2024. An appearance by all parties is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss the status of the receivership.

Ruling

IN THE MATTER OF: CAMI EKSTROM
Jul 15, 2024 | 24STCP01487
Case Number: 24STCP01487 Hearing Date: July 15, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.

Document

BOND -v- CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Print
Feb 11, 2021 | Garza, Thomas | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | CIVSB2104333

Document

In Re: Calvary SPV, LLC Print
May 01, 2024 | Jay H Robinson | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | CIVSB2411994

Document

In re: Bronson Gunner Lee Gorgei Print
Jul 15, 2024 | Corey G Lee | Petition for Change of Name | Petition for Change of Name | CIVSB2422295

Document

IN RE: MELISSA ISABELLA CORTEZ ORTIZ Print
Jul 15, 2024 | Corey G Lee | Petition for Change of Name | Petition for Change of Name | CIVSB2422297

Document

In re:Willis Print
Jul 15, 2024 | Corey G Lee | Petition for Change of Name | Petition for Change of Name | CIVSB2422294

Document

In Re: Calvary SPV, LLC Print
May 01, 2024 | Jay H Robinson | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | CIVSB2411994

Document

In re:Casady Print
Jul 15, 2024 | Michael A Sachs | Petition for Change of Name | Petition for Change of Name | CIVSB2422253

Document

In Re: Jeannie Oma Dean Scott Print
Jul 16, 2024 | Carlos Cabrera | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | Other Petition (Not Spec) Unlimited | CIVSB2422329