California Rules of Court|Rule 3.1800. Default judgments

                                                

<< Previous Rule
[ Back to Title Index ]
     |       Printer-friendly version of this page

2024 California Rules of Court

Rule 3.1800. Default judgments

(a) Documents to be submitted

A party seeking a default judgment on declarations must use mandatory Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter Default) (form CIV-100), unless the action is subject to the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act, Civil Code section 1788.50 et seq., in which case the party must use mandatory Request for Entry of Default (Fair Debt Buying Practices Act) (form CIV-105). In an unlawful detainer case, a party may, in addition, use optional Declaration for Default Judgment by Court (form UD-116) when seeking a court judgment based on declarations. The following must be included in the documents filed with the clerk:

(1)  Except in unlawful detainer cases, a brief summary of the case identifying the parties and the nature of plaintiff's claim;

(2)  Declarations or other admissible evidence in support of the judgment requested;

(3)  Interest computations as necessary;

(4)  A memorandum of costs and disbursements;

(5)  A declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant against whom judgment is sought;

(6)  A proposed form of judgment;

(7)  A dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under Code of Civil Procedure section 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment;

(8)  Exhibits as necessary; and

(9)  A request for attorney fees if allowed by statute or by the agreement of the parties.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2018; previously amended effective January 1, 2005, January 1, 2007, and July 1, 2007.)

(b) Fee schedule

A court may by local rule establish a schedule of attorney's fees to be used by that court in determining the reasonable amount of attorney's fees to be allowed in the case of a default judgment.

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007.)

Rule 3.1800 amended effective January 1, 2018; adopted as rule 388 effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2005, and July 1, 2007; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007.

View Latest Rulings

ROEs In defaults, California Rules of Court section 3.1800, subdivision (a)(7) requires a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought. Here, cross-complainant has not dismissed ROEs 2-20. They must be dismissed before judgment can be entered. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a) and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary.

  • Name

    CHARANJIT DHALIWAL V. COMPUS GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION

  • Case No.

    15CECG00009

  • Hearing

    May 31, 2019

ROEs In defaults, California Rules of Court section 3.1800, subdivision (a)(7) requires a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought. Here, cross-complainant has not dismissed ROEs 2-20. They must be dismissed before judgment can be entered. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a) and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary.

  • Name

    CHARANJIT DHALIWAL V. COMPUS GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION

  • Case No.

    15CECG00009

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2018

DOEs: In defaults, California Rules of Court section 3.1800, subdivision (a)(7) requires a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought. Additionally, no default judgment may be entered against someone served as a ‘Doe’ unless additional requirements are met. (Pelayo v. JJ Lee Mgmt. Co., Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 484, 496.) Here, Plaintiff has not dismissed ‘Does’ 1-100; they must be dismissed before judgment can be entered.

  • Name

    NAOMI SMITH V. CHRISTOPHER ISLAS

  • Case No.

    16CECG04155

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2017

  • Judge

    Jeff Hamilton

  • County

    Fresno County, CA

Also, in defaults, California Rules of Court section 3.1800 (a)(7) requires a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought. In the case at bar, plaintiffs have not dismissed DOEs 1-50; they must be dismissed before judgment can be entered. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a) and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary.

  • Name

    MICHELLE LOWE V. HAPPY YU, LLC

  • Case No.

    16CECG03557

  • Hearing

    Oct 24, 2018

Explanation: DOEs In defaults, California Rules of Court section 3.1800, subdivision (a)(7) requires a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought. Here, plaintiff has not dismissed DOEs 1-10. They must be dismissed before judgment can be entered. Pain and Suffering A plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages for physical pain and mental suffering that accompany or otherwise result from physical injury.

  • Name

    BRYANT HOWARD V. JENNIFER BOHN

  • Case No.

    17CECG00330

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2018

  • Judge

    Rosie McGuire

  • County

    Fresno County, CA

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Jul 09, 2008

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Soussan G. Bruguera Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Soussan G. Bruguera

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

21 Files
Filed

Nov 20, 2017

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Malcolm Mackey Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Malcolm Mackey

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

51 Files
Filed

Feb 09, 2018

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Robert B. Broadbelt Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert B. Broadbelt

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

May 26, 2010

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Holly E. Kendig Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Holly E. Kendig

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

Mar 03, 2015

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Holly J. Fujie Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Holly J. Fujie

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Personal Injury

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon Preview

Be @ Law Offices of Barak Isaacs Barak Isaacs SB#196916 18757 Burbank Boulevard Suite 215 Tarzana, California 91356 LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT Telephone: (818) 344-4175 Facsimile: (818) 344-1546 JUL 06 2018 Attorne…

Case Filed

Jan 30, 2018

Case Status

Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 07/06/2018

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 06, 2018

Category

Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. John P. Doyle Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for John P. Doyle
preview-icon Preview

§ 3, _ _ O , I 1 Daniel S. Latter (SBN 099848) Law Ofces of Daniel S. Latter 2 8383 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 510 3 Beverly Hills, California 90211 4 (323) 944-0611 Phone - (323) 653-3021 Fax 5 6 Attorneys for Plain…

Case Filed

Nov 20, 2017

Case Status

Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 11/19/2018

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 19, 2018

Category

Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Malcolm Mackey Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Malcolm Mackey
preview-icon Preview

yt Daniel S. Latter (SBN 099848) FILED fornia Superior Court Law Offices of Daniel S. Latter County of Li 8383 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 510 NOV 19 2618 Bever…

Case Filed

Nov 20, 2017

Case Status

Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 11/19/2018

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 19, 2018

Category

Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Malcolm Mackey Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Malcolm Mackey
preview-icon Preview

1 MARTIN F. GOLDMAN Bar No. 45240 LAW OFFICES 0F MARTIN F. GOLDMAN 2 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 620 Encino, CA 91436 3 Telephone: 310-470-8487 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 Attorney's File No. 2357.68 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT 0F TIIE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 MARCOLIN EYEWEAR CASE NO. 20BBCV00506 11 …

Case Filed

Aug 18, 2020

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 12, 2021

Category

Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. John J. Kralik Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for John J. Kralik
preview-icon Preview

65 . 0 , ‘ 0 1 Daniel S. Latter (SBN 099848) Law Ofces of Daniel S. Latter 2 8383 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 510 3 Beverly Hills, California 90211 4 (323) 944-0611 Phone - (3…

Case Filed

Nov 20, 2017

Case Status

Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 11/19/2018

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 19, 2018

Category

Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Malcolm Mackey Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Malcolm Mackey
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope