California Laws|Section 21081.6.

                                                

21081.6.  

(a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply:

(1)  The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.

(2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based.

(b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design.

(c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a lead agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law.

(Amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 1294, Sec. 4.5. Effective October 1, 1994. Note: October 1, 1994, is the date that Ch. 1294 became law without the Governor's signature.)

View Latest Rulings

Code section 21081.6(b) by failing to adopt feasible mitigation measures that would substantially lessen or avoid the Project’s potentially significant impacts and to describe those measures in the MND. The fourth cause of action alleges that Respondents committed an unlawful gift of public funds in violation of section 6 of article XVI of the California Constitution by vacating a portion of a public alleyway for the benefit of Real Parties without receiving any compensation.

  • Name

    CIVIC INTERSPACE ET AL VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

  • Case No.

    BS172029

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2018

Indeed, Section 21081.6(a)(1) expressly refers to a reporting or monitoring program. Petitioner has failed to meet the burden of establishing that any portion of the mitigation measures adopted to address, to the extent possible, the significant visual/aesthetic and cultural/historical impacts caused by the project, are not appropriately addressed by some legitimately recognized means constituting an MMRP under Pub.Res.C. section 21081.6 or Guidelines section 15097.

  • Name

    FRIENDS OF THE BRIDGE VS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

  • Case No.

    1338496

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2010

With respect to the CAP as a plan-level document itself, the County failed to proceed in the manner required by law by failing to incorporate mitigation measures into the CAP as required by Public Resources Code section 21081.6." 231 Cal.App.4th at 1167 (italics in original).

  • Name

    PETITION OF GOLDEN DOOR PROPERTIES LLC

  • Case No.

    37-2016-00037402-CU-TT-CTL

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2017

With respect to the CAP as a plan-level document itself, the County failed to proceed in the manner required by law by failing to incorporate mitigation measures into the CAP as required by Public Resources Code section 21081.6." 231 Cal.App.4th at 1167 (italics in original).

  • Name

    SIERRA CLUB VS. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO [E-FILE]

  • Case No.

    37-2012-00101054-CU-TT-CTL

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2017

(AR 118) Further, for this mitigation measure the Board of Supervisors adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to enforce these measures Finding: As required by Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091(d) and 15097, the Board, in adopting these findings, also adopts a MMRP. Evidence Supporting the Finding A.

  • Name

    TIBURON OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE VS. COUNTY OF MARIN

  • Case No.

    CV1704069

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2019

View More Rulings
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 21081.5.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 21081.7.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 11 pages

P. RANDOLPH FINCH JR., SBN 185004 EMAIL: pfinch@ftblaw.com 1 ANDREA L. PETRAY, SBN 240085 Exempt from Filing Fees EMAIL: apetray@ftblaw.com Government Code section 6103 2 THOMAS E. DIAMOND, SBN 323333 EMAIL: tdiamond@ftblaw.com 3 FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4 4747 EXECUTIVE DRIVE – SU…

Case Filed

Dec 13, 2022

Case Status

Pending

County

Kern County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 06, 2023

Judge Hon. Foley, Therese Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Foley, Therese
preview-icon 5 pages

1 2 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN 4 5 SANTOS GONZALEZ, PATRICIA SERNA, ) Case No.: BCV-17-100040 TSC 6 ARACELY SANCHEZ, AND JOSE LUIS) SANCHEZ ) …

County

Kern County, CA

Filed Date

Aug 09, 2022

Judge Hon. Clark, Thomas S. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Clark, Thomas S.
preview-icon 12 pages

[Exempt From Filing Fee Government Code § 6103] 1 MONA G. EBRAHIMI, State Bar No. 236550 mebrahimi@kmtg. com 2 LESLIE Z. WALKER, State Bar No. 249310 lwalker(^kmtg.com 3 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Professional Corporation 4 400 Capitol Mall, 27* Floor …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

May 26, 2017

Category

Unlimited Civil

preview-icon 12 pages

[Exempt From Filing Fee Government Code § 6103] 1 MONA G. EBRAHIMI, State Bar No. 236550 mebrahimi@kmtg. com 2 LESLIE Z. WALKER, State Bar No. 249310 lwalker(^kmtg.com 3 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Professional Corporation 4 400 Capitol Mall, 27* Floor …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

May 26, 2017

Category

Writ of Mandate

preview-icon 12 pages

[Exempt From Filing Fee Government Code § 6103] 1 MONA G. EBRAHIMI, State Bar No. 236550 mebrahimi@kmtg. com 2 LESLIE Z. WALKER, State Bar No. 249310 lwalker(^kmtg.com 3 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Professional Corporation 4 400 Capitol Mall, 27* Floor …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

May 26, 2017

Category

Unlimited Civil

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope