Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
116.221.
In addition to the jurisdiction conferred by Section 116.220, the small claims court has jurisdiction in an action brought by a natural person, if the amount of the demand does not exceed twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500), except as otherwise prohibited by subdivision (c) of Section 116.220 or subdivision (a) of Section 116.231.
Section 116.221 expands that jurisdiction to $7,500 in actions brought by a natural person. CCP § 85 defines limited jurisdiction cases as those in which the amount in controversy ?does not exceed? $25,000. There is no minimum value for a limited jurisdiction case. Certainly, under CCP § 87(a), a limited civil case may be brought in the small claims division if the case is within the jurisdiction of the small claims division. However, the section does not require it to be brought there.
JOY PODGER VS STUART KENDALL ET AL
1246068
Sep 10, 2007
Santa Barbara County, CA
Per Code of Civil Procedure section 116.221, the small claims court has jurisdiction in an action brought by a natural person and the amount of the demand does not exceed twelve thousand five hundred ($12,500) dollars. [2] Under Code of Civil Procedure section 403.040, [t]he plaintiff, cross-complaint, or petitioner may file a motion for reclassification within the time allowed for that party to amend the initial pleading.
JUSTIN SHELTON VS WIB HOLDINGS, LLC
22SMCV02041
Mar 18, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
Regarding the jurisdictional argument, Defendants point to Code of Civil Procedure section 116.223, which states in relevant part: Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) Section 116.220, Section 116.221, or any other law, the small claims court has jurisdiction in any action for recovery of COVID-19 rental debt, as defined in Section 1179.02, and any defenses thereto, regardless of the amount demanded. (Code Civ. Proc., § 116.223, subd. (b)(1).)
22STLC04924
Dec 18, 2023
Echo Dawn Ryan
Los Angeles County, CA
(b)(1) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) Section 116.220, Section 116.221, or any other law, the small claims court has jurisdiction in any action for recovery of COVID-19 rental debt, as defined in Section 1179.02, and any defenses thereto, regardless of the amount demanded.
LEE VS BARBIER
RG20079393
Feb 18, 2021
Alameda County, CA
Flanagan argues that the higher jurisdictional limit of Code of Civil Procedure section 116.221 applies instead. Section 116.221 now provides: “In addition to the jurisdiction conferred by Section 116.220, the small claims court has jurisdiction in an action brought by a natural person, if the amount of the demand does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) ….”
ELIZABETH FLANAGAN VS WELLS FARGO BANK NA
1342359
Apr 04, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
Oct 28, 2013
Dismissal
San Francisco County
San Francisco County, CA
MONEY
Jan 17, 2014
Non-Jury Verdict
Stockton
San Joaquin County, CA
Small Claims
Small Claims
General Small Claims
Aug 21, 2013
Bankruptcy
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles County, CA
Small Claims (Limited Jurisdiction)
Small Claims
General Small Claims
Aug 22, 2013
Judgment (Other)
Kern County
Kern County, CA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4514 JOANNA GING SMALL CLAIMS ORDER PLAINTIFF (S) VS. NO. CSM-13-845357 JUSTIN LAM Small Claims Order of Dismissal of Entire Action L.R. 18.0 DEFENDANT (S) Appearance by Plaintiff. Appearance by Defendant. The court orders dismissal of the entire action without prejudice. (Local Rule 18.0) DATED: Jan 03, 2014 JUDGE PRO TEM Judicial Officer Small Claims Order of Dismissal of Entire Action L…
San Francisco County, CA
Jan 03, 2014
MONEY
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Northwest District, Van Nuys Courthouse East, Department H 22VESC00770 December 29, 2022 SANDY MARCHAND vs LIEBOBUILDERS 4:06 PM Judge: Honorable Michael R. Amerian CSR: None Judicial Assistant: R. Karapetyan ERM: …
Apr 14, 2022
Judgment - contested
Los Angeles County, CA
Dec 29, 2022
Small Claims (Limited Jurisdiction)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Northwest District, Van Nuys Courthouse East, Department H 20VESC03109 June 1, 2021 RICHARD T. MILLER vs FRANCISCO PULIDO 2:30 PM Judge: Honorable Jessica A. Uzcategui CSR: None Judicial Assistant: J. Trujillo …
Dec 14, 2020
Judgment - contested
Los Angeles County, CA
Jun 01, 2021
Small Claims (Limited Jurisdiction)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division South District, Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse, Department S13 20LBSC01667 March 3, 2021 KING AWNINGS INC. vs PACIFIC STONE 4:35 PM CONSTRUCTION, et al. Judge: Honorable Douglas W. Stern CSR: None Judicial Assistant: K. Ono…
Los Angeles County, CA
Mar 03, 2021
Small Claims (Limited Jurisdiction)
Superior Court of California County of Kern Bakersfield Department 4 Date: 05/19/2017 BCS-16-002237-APP …
Jan 12, 2017
Judgment
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.