California Laws|Section 1670.8.

                                                

1670.8.  

(a) (1) A contract or proposed contract for the sale or lease of consumer goods or services may not include a provision waiving the consumer’s right to make any statement regarding the seller or lessor or its employees or agents, or concerning the goods or services.

(2) It shall be unlawful to threaten or to seek to enforce a provision made unlawful under this section, or to
otherwise penalize a consumer for making any statement protected under this section.

(b) Any waiver of the provisions of this section is contrary to public policy, and is void and unenforceable.

(c) Any person who violates this section shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for the first violation, and five thousand dollars ($5,000) for the second and for each subsequent violation, to be assessed and collected in a civil action brought by the consumer, by the Attorney General, or by the district attorney or city attorney of the county or city in which the violation occurred. When collected, the civil penalty shall be payable, as appropriate, to the consumer or to the general fund of whichever governmental entity brought the action to assess the civil penalty.

(d) In addition, for a willful, intentional, or reckless violation of this section, a consumer or public prosecutor may recover a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

(e) The penalty provided by this section is not an exclusive remedy, and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law. This section shall not be construed to prohibit or limit a person or business that hosts online consumer reviews or comments from removing a statement that is otherwise lawful to remove.

(Added by Stats. 2014, Ch. 308, Sec. 1. (AB 2365) Effective January 1, 2015.)

View Latest Rulings

First Cause of Action – Violation of Civil Code section 1670.8 Subdivision (a)(1) of Civil Code section 1670.8 states: “A contract or proposed contract for the sale or lease of consumer goods or services may not include a provision waiving the consumer's right to make any statement regarding the seller or lessor or its employees or agents, or concerning the goods or services.”

  • Name

    GLOCKNER V. PICARD

  • Case No.

    SCV-262064

  • Hearing

    Jun 13, 2018

  • Judge

    René Auguste Chouteau

  • County

    Sonoma County, CA

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 1670.8 AND 1951.2 There is no evidence in fact or law that a lease agreement for rental of residential property comes within the scope of Civil Code section 1670.8. Business and Professions Code section 302 defines a consumer as "any individual who seeks or acquires, by purchase or lease, any goods, services, money, or credit for personal, family, or household purposes."

  • Name

    SHELLY HART VS LASALLE PROPERTY FUND REIT, INC, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    23VECV01030

  • Hearing

    Aug 08, 2023

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

Plaintiff says compelling arbitration would effectively deny her the right to bring a civil action under Business and Professions Code section 22386, Civil Code section 1812.218, and Civil Code section 1670.8. However, the mere fact that defendants allegedly violated a statute does not mean such claims cannot be arbitrated. See, e.g., Armendariz v.

  • Name

    CAMILLA RAWLINGS VS IDEAPROS LLC

  • Case No.

    37-2018-00043440-CU-FR-CTL

  • Hearing

    May 09, 2019

Instead, Section 1670.8 merely prohibits contracts that limit consumers’ rights to publish reviews and other statements. In addition, as noted above, Cross-Complainants’ fifth cause of action is barred by the litigation privilege. Thus, Cross-Complainants have failed to meet their burden to show the probability of prevailing on the fifth cause of action. Therefore, Cross-Defendants’ Special Anti-SLAPP Motion to Strike is granted. Cross-Defendants are ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Name

    FRED J. KIM, DDS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. VS JOO HWAN KIM, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    20TRCV00099

  • Hearing

    Aug 04, 2020

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Feb 28, 2018

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Chouteau, Rene A

Court

Superior

County

Sonoma County, CA

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

7 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Status

Active

Judge

Hon. Carolyn B. Kuhl Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Carolyn B. Kuhl

Court

Stanley Mosk

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)

7 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Status

Active

Judge

Hon. Stuart M. Rice Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Stuart M. Rice

Court

Stanley Mosk

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)

4 Files
Filed

Mar 07, 2024

Status

Active

Court

Superior

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

1 File
Filed

Dec 07, 2023

Status

Active

Judge

Hon. Maren E. Nelson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Maren E. Nelson

Court

Stanley Mosk

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

View More Dockets
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 1670.7.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 1670.8.5.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 13 pages

MICHELLE M. LUNDE, SBN 246585 5“W'°' ‘3mm of“MW” |: SAVAGE, LAMB & LUNDE, PC County 0i Butte I 1550 Humboldt Road, Suite 4 U…

Case Filed

Sep 10, 2018

Case Status

Closed

County

Butte County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 10, 2018

Judge Hon. Robert A. Glusman Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert A. Glusman
preview-icon 15 pages

Robert Ahdoot (SBN 172098) Electronically FILED by rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806) 12/07/2023 7:57 PM twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, Christopher E. Stiner…

Case Filed

Dec 07, 2023

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Dec 07, 2023

Category

Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Maren E. Nelson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Maren E. Nelson
preview-icon 15 pages

Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806) twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com Electronically FILED by Robert Ahdoot (SBN 172098) Superior Court of California, rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com County of Los An ge les 2/28/2024 6:50 PI Christopher E. Stiner (SBN 276033) David W. Slayton, estiner@ahdootwolfson.com Executive Officer/Cler…

Case Filed

Feb 28, 2024

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Feb 28, 2024

Category

Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Stuart M. Rice Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Stuart M. Rice
preview-icon 4 pages

LANNY T. WINBERRY [SBN: 85342] JAMES R. KIRBY II [SBN: 88911] F Superior Court of California F NAGELEY, KIRBY & WINBERRY, LLP County of Butte 8801 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 172 11/27/2018 Sacramento, CA 95926 L Telephone No.: …

Case Filed

Sep 10, 2018

Case Status

Closed

County

Butte County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 09, 2019

preview-icon 14 pages

Robert Ahdoot (SBN 172098) Electronically FILED by rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com Superior Court of California, Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806) Count: of Los Angeles twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com 12/07/2023 5:29 David W. Slayton, Christopher E. Stiner (SBN 276033) Executive Off…

Case Filed

Dec 07, 2023

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Dec 07, 2023

Category

Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope