California Code of Regulations|§ 2 - Scope

                                                

Chapters 2-23, 2-24, 2-25, 2-26, 2-27, 2-28, 2-29, 2-30, 2-32, 2-37, 2-47 and 2-54 of Part 2, Title 24, CAC designate the structural building regulations which shall apply to the design of, construction, reconstruction, alteration of or addition to any school building as defined in Sections 39141 and 81131 of the Education Code. The term "school building" shall include all buildings, structures, appurtenances and related systems or facilities as interpreted in Section 14.

These rules and regulations established reasonable standards and minimum requirements for the structural integrity of public school buildings to resist, insofar as practicable, the forces of gravity, wind, and earthquake for the protection of life and property.

Further, the design and construction of the mechanical and electrical systems in school buildings and shall conform to the applicable building regulations in Title 24, CAC.

Further, the design and construction of school buildings shall comply with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the particular occupancies concerned. (See Title 19, CAC.)

Notes

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 21, § 2

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39152 and 81142, Education Code. Reference: Sections 39140 and 81130, Education Code.

1. Editorial correction of printing error (Register 83, No. 45).

View Latest Rulings

C. 2580(b)(5), with the following changes to the proposed SNT: - In Article Four, Section 2, ¶ C, the reference to "Article 6" should be changed to "Article 5." - In Article Four, Section 2, ¶ D, the reference to "Article 8" should be changed to "Article 7." - In Article Four, Section 2, ¶ E, the reference to "Article 9" should be changed to "Article 8." - In Article Four, Section 2, ¶ F, the reference to "Article 9" should be changed to "Article 8.

  • Name

    IN THE MATTER OF CADY LYNN TAYLOR

  • Case No.

    56-2019-00528006-PR-CP-OXN

  • Hearing

    Oct 08, 2019

Thus, it appears that Experian properly terminated the Agreement under Section 2 of the STAC and Section 2 of the Consumer Services Schedule. While Plaintiff contends the Pricing Addendum prevents Experian from terminating the agreements, Pricing Addendums governs the pricing terms and has no impact on Experian’s right to terminate the agreements.

  • Name

    PRANCER CAPITAL CORP VS. EXPERIAN INFO SOLUTIONS

  • Case No.

    30-2018-01002887-CU-BC-CJC

  • Hearing

    May 21, 2019

This Court previously found Experian properly terminated the Agreement under Section 2 of the STAC and Section 2 of the Consumer Services Schedule. (See Court’s 6-17-19 Minute Order.) Specifically, according to Section 2 of the Standard Terms and Conditions, the Agreement "shall continue in effect until the termination of the expiration of all Schedules issued pursuant to this Agreement." (FAC, Exh. A.)

  • Name

    PRANCER CAPITAL CORP VS. EXPERIAN INFO SOLUTIONS

  • Case No.

    30-2018-01002887-CU-BC-CJC

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2019

Thus, case law makes clear that Section 2 of the FAA applies even if the contract contains a general choice of law provision. (See also Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp. v. Mercury Const. Corp. (1983) 460 U.S. 1, "The effect of [Section 2] is to create a body of federal substantive law of arbitrability, applicable to any arbitration agreement within the coverage of the Act;" Sovak v. Chugai Pharms.

  • Name

    JOSEPH JEWELL VS. 23ANDME, INC., A CORPORATION

  • Case No.

    CGC15544119

  • Hearing

    Jun 10, 2015

The Petition fails to address the required notice and distribution method provided in Article Five, Section 2(B). The remaining funds in the Special Needs Trust may be subject to distribution to a public entity. This matter is continued to Monday, July 25, 2022, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 7. Petitioner shall comply with Article Five, Section 2(B).

  • Case No.

    CVPB17-0029297

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2022

  • County

    Shasta County, CA

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Dec 14, 2022

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Bertoli, James G Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Bertoli, James G

Court

Sonoma County

County

Sonoma County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filed

Sep 20, 2017

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Zepeda, Francine Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Zepeda, Francine

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filed

May 22, 2019

Status

Active

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filed

Mar 20, 2018

Status

Judgment (Other)

Judge

Hon. Hopper, Cindy Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Hopper, Cindy

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filed

Dec 04, 2017

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Zepeda, Francine Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Zepeda, Francine

Court

Fresno County

County

Fresno County, CA

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

View More Dockets
Next Section

Doc thumbnail § 1 - Purpose

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO San Bernardino District 247 West 3rd St San Bernardino CA 92415 www.sb-court.org 909-521 -3388 …

Case Filed

Mar 10, 2022

Case Status

Court Supervision Terminated

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 03, 2023

Category

Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary

Judge

Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

preview-icon 2 pages

Case Filed

Aug 15, 2022

Case Status

Dismissed

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 24, 2023

Category

Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited

Judge Hon. Jeffrey R Erickson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jeffrey R Erickson
preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Fontana District 17780 Arrow Boulevard Fontana California 92335 www.sb-court.org 909-350-9322 …

Case Filed

Aug 28, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 14, 2023

Category

Small Claims $1501 - $5000

Judge Hon. Jay H Robinson Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Jay H Robinson
preview-icon 1 page

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO San Bernardino District 247 West 3rd St San Bernardino CA 92415 www.sb-court.org 909-521 -3388 …

Case Filed

Aug 17, 2020

Case Status

Court Supervision Terminated

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 07, 2022

Category

Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary

Judge Hon. Reilly, Tara Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Reilly, Tara
preview-icon 2 pages

CEaRT OF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Ss Lek Ne Ne2) of fe any, Fontana District 17780 Arrow Boulevard Pean Fontana California 92335 OF SAND! …

Case Filed

Jul 05, 2019

Case Status

Stayed

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 20, 2020

Category

Small Claims $5,001 - $10,000

Judge Hon. Robert Driessen Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert Driessen
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope