We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Tenesshua Adams Vs Pacific Villa, Inc., A California Corporation, Et Al.

Case Last Refreshed: 6 months ago

Adams Tenesshua, Diaz Maria, Dussan Jorge, Garcia Kimberly, filed a(n) General Employment - Labor and Employment case represented by Adolph Launa Nicole, Goralnick Ellie, against Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation, Century Villa Inc. A California Corporation, Does 1 Through 50 Inclusive, Glendora Grand Inc. A California Corporation, Pacific Villa Inc. A California Corporation, (total of 5) See All represented by Magnanimo Frank Alfredo, in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts Stanley Mosk with David J. Cowan presiding.

Case Details for Adams Tenesshua v. Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation , et al.

Judge

David J. Cowan

Filing Date

September 29, 2020

Category

Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)

Last Refreshed

October 18, 2023

Practice Area

Labor and Employment

Filing Location

Los Angeles County, CA

Matter Type

General Employment

Filing Court House

Stanley Mosk

Parties for Adams Tenesshua v. Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation , et al.

Plaintiffs

Adams Tenesshua

Diaz Maria

Dussan Jorge

Garcia Kimberly

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Adolph Launa Nicole

Goralnick Ellie

Defendants

Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation

Century Villa Inc. A California Corporation

Does 1 Through 50 Inclusive

Glendora Grand Inc. A California Corporation

Pacific Villa Inc. A California Corporation

Attorneys for Defendants

Magnanimo Frank Alfredo

Case Documents for Adams Tenesshua v. Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation , et al.

Complaint

Date: September 29, 2020

Summons - SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT

Date: September 29, 2020

Civil Case Cover Sheet

Date: September 29, 2020

Case Management Statement

Date: April 19, 2021

Case Management Statement

Date: June 07, 2021

Notice of Ruling

Date: November 04, 2021

Substitution of Attorney

Date: November 19, 2021

Answer

Date: November 19, 2021

Notice of Change of Firm Name

Date: December 09, 2021

Request for Judicial Notice

Date: February 22, 2022

Motion for Stay of Proceedings

Date: February 23, 2022

Notice of Ruling

Date: August 02, 2022

Case Management Statement

Date: 2021-01-11T00:00:00

Ruling: January 27, 2021

Date: 2021-01-27T00:00:00

Case Management Statement

Date: 2021-01-11T00:00:00

Notice (Amended Notice of Motion)

Date: 2021-04-30T00:00:00

Case Management Statement

Date: 2021-06-07T00:00:00

Amended Complaint ( (1st))

Date: 2020-10-23T00:00:00

Civil Case Cover Sheet

Date: 2020-09-29T00:00:00

Complaint

Date: 2020-09-29T00:00:00

Case Management Statement

Date: 2021-04-19T00:00:00

Amended Complaint ( (2nd))

Date: 2021-02-16T00:00:00

Ruling: October 28, 2020

Date: 2020-10-28T00:00:00

Notice (of Case Assignment)

Date: 2020-12-29T00:00:00

Case Management Statement

Date: January 11, 2021

Third Amended Complaint

Date: 2021-07-09T00:00:00

Summons (on Complaint)

Date: 2020-09-29T00:00:00

Reply (to Opposition to Demurrer)

Date: 2021-04-28T00:00:00

Ruling: June 22, 2021

Date: 2021-06-22T00:00:00

Fourth Amended Complaint

Date: 2021-08-26T00:00:00

Notice of Ruling

Date: 2021-11-04T00:00:00

Ruling: August 12, 2021

Date: 2021-08-12T00:00:00

Substitution of Attorney

Date: 2021-11-19T00:00:00

Answer

Date: 2021-11-19T00:00:00

Ruling: April 11, 2022

Date: 2022-04-11T00:00:00

Ruling: October 27, 2021

Date: 2021-10-27T00:00:00

Substitution of Attorney

Date: 2021-11-19T00:00:00

Notice of Change of Firm Name

Date: 2021-12-09T00:00:00

Substitution of Attorney

Date: 2021-11-19T00:00:00

Request for Judicial Notice

Date: 2022-03-28T00:00:00

Request for Judicial Notice

Date: 2022-02-22T00:00:00

Substitution of Attorney

Date: 2021-11-19T00:00:00

Summons (on Complaint)

Date: 2020-09-29T00:00:00

Amended Complaint ( (1st))

Date: 2020-10-23T00:00:00

Notice (of Case Assignment)

Date: 2020-12-29T00:00:00

Amended Complaint ( (2nd))

Date: 2021-02-16T00:00:00

Reply (to Opposition to Demurrer)

Date: 2021-04-28T00:00:00

Notice (Amended Notice of Motion)

Date: 2021-04-30T00:00:00

Motion for Stay of Proceedings

Date: 2022-02-23T00:00:00

Notice of Ruling

Date: April 13, 2022

Case Events for Adams Tenesshua v. Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation , et al.

Type Description
Hearing Department 20 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Post-Arbitration Status Conference
Docket Event in Department 20 Post-Arbitration Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Continued - by Court
Post-Arbitration Status Conference - Not Held - Advanced and Continued - by Court
Docket Event Certificate of Mailing for (Court Order) of ; Filed by: Clerk
Docket Event Minute Order (Court Order)
Hearing Pursuant to written stipulation, Post-Arbitration Status Conference scheduled for in Stanley Mosk Courthouse at Department 20 Not Held - Advanced and Continued - by Court was rescheduled to 08:30 AM
Docket Event Updated -- Stipulation and Order JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE POST-ARBITRATON STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER: Filed By: PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California corporation (Defendant); Result: Granted ; Result Date:
Hearing Post-Arbitration Status Conference scheduled for in Stanley Mosk Courthouse at Department 20
Docket Event Stipulation and Order JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE POST-ARBITRATON STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER; Signed and Filed by: PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California corporation (Defendant); As to: TENESSHUA ADAMS (Plaintiff)
Docket Event in Department 20, Kevin C. Brazile, Presiding Court Order
Court Order

Judge: Kevin C. Brazile

Docket Event Updated -- Launa Nicole Adolph (Attorney): Organization Name: blank; Name Suffix: blank
See all events