On September 29, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Adams Tenesshua,
Diaz Maria,
Dussan Jorge,
Garcia Kimberly,
and
Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation,
Century Villa Inc. A California Corporation,
Does 1 Through 50 Inclusive,
Glendora Grand Inc. A California Corporation,
Pacific Villa Inc. A California Corporation,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/20/2022 01:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk
1 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
2 Sherman Oaks, California 91403
(818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax
3
FRANK A. MAGNANIMO, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 174570
4 Email: fmagnanimo@tharpe-howell.com
JASMINE R. KIAEI, ESQ.: STATE BAR NO.: 331080
5 Email: jkiaei@tharpe-howell.com
JOSEPH R. HOLMES, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 312381
6 Email: jholmes@tharpe-howell.com
7 Attorneys for Defendants
PACIFIC VILLA, INC.; GLENDORA GRAND, INC.; CENTINELA GRAND, INC. and
8 CENTURY VILLA, INC.
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK
11
12 TENESSHUA ADAMS, individually and on CASE NO.: 20STCV37260
behalf of all aggrieved employees,
13 Complaint Filed: September 29, 2020
Plaintiffs, Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction
14 [Assigned to the Hon. Kevin C. Brazile, Dept. 20]
15 vs.
DEFENDANT CENTINELA GRAND, INC’S
16 PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California REPLY TO PLAINTIFF MARIA DIAZ’S
corporation; GLENDORA GRAND, INC., a OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION
17 California corporation; CENTINELA TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF
GRAND, INC., a California corporation; PLAINTIFF’S INDIVIDUAL PAGA CLAIMS
18 AND TO DISMISS HER REPRESENTATIVE
CENTURY VILLA, INC., a California PAGA CLAIMS
19 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive DATE: July 27, 2022
20 TIME: 8:30 a.m.
Defendants. DEPT.: 20
21
RESERVATION ID: 694533398705
22
Trial Date: April 10, 2023
23
24 I. INTRODUCTION
25 Defendant filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s individual claims to arbitration and dismiss
26 the remaining, representative claims. Plaintiff filed an opposition, conceding to the Supreme Court’s
27 decision that a Plaintiff’s individual claims must be compelled to arbitration given the existence of a
28 valid arbitration agreement with applicable language. Plaintiff’s opposition is solely based on the
-1-
DEFENDANT’S REPLY RE: MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF’S
INDIVIDUAL PAGA CLAIMS AND TO DISMISS HER REPRESENTATIVE PAGA CLAIMS
Document Filed Date
July 20, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 29, 2020
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/20/2022 01:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor 2 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 (818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax 3 FRANK A. MAGNANIMO, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 174570 4 Email: fmagnanimo@tharpe-howell.com JASMINE R. KIAEI, ESQ.: STATE BAR NO.: 331080 5 Email: jkiaei@tharpe-howell.com JOSEPH R. HOLMES, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 312381 6 Email: jholmes@tharpe-howell.com 7 Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC VILLA, INC.; GLENDORA GRAND, INC.; CENTINELA GRAND, INC. and 8 CENTURY VILLA, INC. 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK 11 12 TENESSHUA ADAMS, individually and on CASE NO.: 20STCV37260 behalf of all aggrieved employees, 13 Complaint Filed: September 29, 2020 Plaintiffs, Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction 14 [Assigned to the Hon. Kevin C. Brazile, Dept. 20] 15 vs. DEFENDANT CENTINELA GRAND, INC’S 16 PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California REPLY TO PLAINTIFF MARIA DIAZ’S corporation; GLENDORA GRAND, INC., a OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION 17 California corporation; CENTINELA TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF GRAND, INC., a California corporation; PLAINTIFF’S INDIVIDUAL PAGA CLAIMS 18 AND TO DISMISS HER REPRESENTATIVE CENTURY VILLA, INC., a California PAGA CLAIMS 19 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive DATE: July 27, 2022 20 TIME: 8:30 a.m. Defendants. DEPT.: 20 21 RESERVATION ID: 694533398705 22 Trial Date: April 10, 2023 23 24 I. INTRODUCTION 25 Defendant filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s individual claims to arbitration and dismiss 26 the remaining, representative claims. Plaintiff filed an opposition, conceding to the Supreme Court’s 27 decision that a Plaintiff’s individual claims must be compelled to arbitration given the existence of a 28 valid arbitration agreement with applicable language. Plaintiff’s opposition is solely based on the -1- DEFENDANT’S REPLY RE: MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF PLAINTIFF’S INDIVIDUAL PAGA CLAIMS AND TO DISMISS HER REPRESENTATIVE PAGA CLAIMS