On September 29, 2020 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Adams Tenesshua,
Diaz Maria,
Dussan Jorge,
Garcia Kimberly,
and
Centinela Grand Inc. A California Corporation,
Century Villa Inc. A California Corporation,
Does 1 Through 50 Inclusive,
Glendora Grand Inc. A California Corporation,
Pacific Villa Inc. A California Corporation,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2021 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk
1 Frank A. Magnanimo, Esq. - SBN 174570
frank@magdeanlaw.com
2 Lauren A. Dean, Esq. - SBN 174722
lauren@magdeanlaw.com
3 MAGNANIMO & DEAN, LLP
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 803
4 Woodland Hills, California 91364
Telephone: (818) 305-3450
5 Facsimile: (818) 305-3451
6 Attorneys for Defendants
Pacific Villa, Inc., Glendora Grand, Inc.,
7 Centinela Grand, Inc., and Century Villa, Inc.
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10 TENESSHUA ADAMS, individually and on CASE NO.: 20STCV37260
behalf of all aggrieved employees,
11 CASE FILED: 09/29/20
Plaintiff,
12
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’
13 vs. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH
14 PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California AMENDED COMPLAINT
corporation; GLENDORA GRAND, INC., a
15 DATE: October 27, 2021
California corporation; CENTINELA TIME: 8:30 a.m.
GRAND, INC., a California corporation; DEPT.: 20
16
CENTURY VILLA, INC., a California
17 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, Reservation ID: 347287305345
inclusive
18 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO
Defendants. JUDGE KEVIN C. BRAZILE, DEPT. 20
19
DISCOVERY CUT OFF: NONE
20
MOTION CUT-OFF: NONE
21 TRIAL DATE: NONE
22
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF
23
RECORD HEREIN:
24
Defendants Pacific Villa, Inc., Glendora Grand, Inc., Centinela Grand, Inc., and Century
25
Villa, Inc. (collectively “Defendants’), hereby submit the following Reply to Plaintiffs’
26
Opposition to the Defendants’ Demurrer to the Fourth Amended Complaint.
27
///
28
///
1
Defendants’ Reply to Opposition to Demurrer to Fourth Amended Complaint
{Client Files-NEW/PACI02/003/PLD/00098434.DOCX} Printed on Recycled Paper
Document Filed Date
October 20, 2021
Case Filing Date
September 29, 2020
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/20/2021 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Gregg,Deputy Clerk 1 Frank A. Magnanimo, Esq. - SBN 174570 frank@magdeanlaw.com 2 Lauren A. Dean, Esq. - SBN 174722 lauren@magdeanlaw.com 3 MAGNANIMO & DEAN, LLP 21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 803 4 Woodland Hills, California 91364 Telephone: (818) 305-3450 5 Facsimile: (818) 305-3451 6 Attorneys for Defendants Pacific Villa, Inc., Glendora Grand, Inc., 7 Centinela Grand, Inc., and Century Villa, Inc. 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 TENESSHUA ADAMS, individually and on CASE NO.: 20STCV37260 behalf of all aggrieved employees, 11 CASE FILED: 09/29/20 Plaintiff, 12 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ 13 vs. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH 14 PACIFIC VILLA, INC., a California AMENDED COMPLAINT corporation; GLENDORA GRAND, INC., a 15 DATE: October 27, 2021 California corporation; CENTINELA TIME: 8:30 a.m. GRAND, INC., a California corporation; DEPT.: 20 16 CENTURY VILLA, INC., a California 17 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, Reservation ID: 347287305345 inclusive 18 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO Defendants. JUDGE KEVIN C. BRAZILE, DEPT. 20 19 DISCOVERY CUT OFF: NONE 20 MOTION CUT-OFF: NONE 21 TRIAL DATE: NONE 22 TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 23 RECORD HEREIN: 24 Defendants Pacific Villa, Inc., Glendora Grand, Inc., Centinela Grand, Inc., and Century 25 Villa, Inc. (collectively “Defendants’), hereby submit the following Reply to Plaintiffs’ 26 Opposition to the Defendants’ Demurrer to the Fourth Amended Complaint. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Defendants’ Reply to Opposition to Demurrer to Fourth Amended Complaint {Client Files-NEW/PACI02/003/PLD/00098434.DOCX} Printed on Recycled Paper