California Laws|Section 418.10.

                                                

418.10.  

(a) A defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion for one or more of the following purposes:

(1) To quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court over him or her.

(2) To stay or dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum.

(3) To dismiss the action pursuant to the applicable provisions of Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 583.110) of Title 8.

(b) The notice shall designate, as the time for making the motion, a date not more than 30 days after filing of the notice. The notice shall be served in the same manner, and at the same times, prescribed by subdivision (b) of Section 1005. The service and filing of the notice shall extend the defendant’s time to plead until 15 days after service upon him or her of a written notice of entry of an order denying his or her motion, except that for good cause shown the court may extend the defendant’s time to plead for an additional period not exceeding 20 days.

(c) If the motion is denied by the trial court, the defendant, within 10 days after service upon him or her of a written notice of entry of
an order of the court denying his or her motion, or within any further time not exceeding 20 days that the trial court may for good cause allow, and before pleading, may petition an appropriate reviewing court for a writ of mandate to require the trial court to enter its order quashing the service of summons or staying or dismissing the action. The defendant shall file or enter his or her responsive pleading in the trial court within the time prescribed by subdivision (b) unless, on or before the last day of the defendant’s time to plead, he or she serves upon the adverse party and files with the trial court a notice that he or she has petitioned for a writ of mandate. The service and filing of the notice shall extend the defendant’s time to plead until 10 days after service upon him or her of a written notice of the final judgment in the mandate proceeding. The time to plead may for good cause shown be extended by the trial court for an additional period not exceeding 20 days.

(d) No default may be entered against the defendant before expiration of his or her time to plead, and no motion under this section, or under Section 473 or 473.5 when joined with a motion under this section, or application to the court or stipulation of the parties for an extension of the time to plead, shall be deemed a general appearance by the defendant.

(e) A defendant or cross-defendant may make a motion under this section and simultaneously answer, demur, or move to strike the complaint or cross-complaint.

(1) Notwithstanding Section 1014, no act by a party who makes a motion under this section, including filing an answer, demurrer, or motion to strike constitutes an appearance, unless the court denies the motion made under this section. If the court denies the motion made under this section, the defendant or
cross-defendant is not deemed to have generally appeared until entry of the order denying the motion.

(2) If the motion made under this section is denied and the defendant or cross-defendant petitions for a writ of mandate pursuant to subdivision (c), the defendant or cross-defendant is not deemed to have generally appeared until the proceedings on the writ petition have finally concluded.

(3) Failure to make a motion under this section at the time of filing a demurrer or motion to strike constitutes a waiver of the issues of lack of personal jurisdiction, inadequacy of process, inadequacy of service of process, inconvenient forum, and delay in prosecution.

(Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 69, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2003.)

View Latest Rulings

The unopposed Motion (ROA # 13) of Defendant RAVISH BHATTIPROLU ("Defendant") for an Order quashing the purported service of summons and complaint, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, on the grounds that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant, is GRANTED.

  • Name

    HANWEI CHENG VS. LEAR MARKETING LLC

  • Case No.

    37-2019-00057416-CU-OE-CTL

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

Although Movants assert rather boldly that section 410.30 is the specific statute and section 418.10 is the general statute, Britton makes clear that the opposite is true. As noted in Britton, the “general language” of section 410.30, subdivision (b) “does not contradict the subsequently enacted and specific waiver provision in section 418.10.” ((Ibid. .)

  • Name

    ROSEMARY PERERA ET AL VS LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY ET AL

  • Case No.

    BC672524

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2018

Notice Of Defts' Motion To Quash Service Of The Summons And Complaint (Ccp Section 418.10) ON CALENDAR FOR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2006. DEFENDANTS DEBORAH REILLY AND PATRICK REILLY Motion To Quash Service Of The Summons And Complaint (Ccp Section 418.10) IS DENIED. =(302/REQ/AP)

  • Name

    BRIDGEPORT FINANCIAL, INC VS. DEBORAH REILLY ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC06454220

  • Hearing

    Oct 12, 2006

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Service Of Summons Pursuant To Ccp Section 418.10 Set for hearing on Wednesday, September 23, 2009, line 1, DEFENDANT CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO. Motion to Quash Service of Summons Pursuant To CCP Section 418.10. Off Calendar, per moving party. =(302/CWW)

  • Name

    STANLEY GARWOOD ET AL VS. ADVOCATE MINES LIMITED ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC09275216

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2009

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Service Of Summons Pursuant To Ccp Section 418.10 Set for hearing on Wednesday, July 22, 2009, line 2, DEFENDANT CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY Motion To Quash Service Of Summons Pursuant To Ccp Section 418.10. Plaintiff's request for continuance to conduct jurisdictional discovery is granted. Hearing is continued to September 23, 2009. =(302/CWW)

  • Name

    STANLEY GARWOOD ET AL VS. ADVOCATE MINES LIMITED ET AL

  • Case No.

    CGC09275216

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2009

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

Filed

Nov 07, 2017

Status

Other

Judge

Hon. Timothy M. Weiner Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Timothy M. Weiner

Court

Los Angeles County

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Dissolution w/o Minor Children (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Family

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Filed

Oct 13, 2010

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Craig D. Karlan Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Craig D. Karlan

Court

Santa Monica Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Contractual Fraud

1 File
Filed

Jan 03, 2020

Status

Dismissal

Court

Superior

County

Riverside County, CA

Practice Area

Labor and Employment

Matter Type

Wrongful Termination

Filed

May 13, 2014

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Rolf M. Treu Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rolf M. Treu

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Filed

Feb 14, 2012

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Ronald M. Sohigian Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Ronald M. Sohigian

Court

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Category

Petition to Compel/Confirm/Vacate Arbitration (General Jurisdiction)

Practice Area

Arbitration

Matter Type

General Arbitration

View More Dockets
Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 418.11.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 5/21/2021 4:43 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk, By Thu Nguyen, Deputy Clerk 1 BEZAIRE & LEATHERS Evelyn M. Leathers, SBN 242488 2 41 Corporate Park, Suite 320 Irvine, CA 92606 3 Telephone: (714)543-6829 4 Facsimile: (949) 872-2843 5 Attorney for Respondents, TROY…

Case Filed

Jan 10, 2020

Case Status

Open 01/10/2020

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

May 21, 2021

Category

Trust (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Susan J. Matcham Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Susan J. Matcham
preview-icon Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/25/2022 09:50 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Gonzalez,Deputy Clerk 1 GEORGE D. YARON, ESQ. (State Bar #96246) 2 gyaron@yaronlaw.com D. DAVID STEELE, ESQ. (State Bar #171636) 3 dsteele@yaronlaw.com 4 YARON & ASSOCIATES 1300 Clay Street, Suite …

Case Filed

Nov 15, 2013

Case Status

Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/20/2022

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Oct 25, 2022

Category

Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Michael P. Linfield Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael P. Linfield
preview-icon 2 pages

Case Number: 19-CIV-06555 SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 400 County Center 1050 Mission Road Redwood City, CA 94063 South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.sanmateocourt.org Minut…

Case Filed

Nov 05, 2019

Case Status

Active

County

San Mateo County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 06, 2020

Judge Hon. Fineman, Nancy L. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Fineman, Nancy L.
preview-icon 5 pages

Electronically ey Supaot Court of Cation County ot San Nabe oN 1/6/2020 ty__/af JenniferTannous Simon A. Mazzola, SBN 197640 The Mazzola Law Office — Professional Corpo…

Case Filed

Nov 05, 2019

Case Status

Active

County

San Mateo County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 06, 2020

Judge Hon. Fineman, Nancy L. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Fineman, Nancy L.
preview-icon Preview

7 ORIGINAL BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP Sy notat rt of‘apaltornia Eric M. George (State Bar No. 166403) unty of Li george@berfirm.com Ira Bibbero (State Bar No. 217518) …

Case Filed

Mar 19, 2018

Case Status

Pending

County

Los Angeles County, CA

Filed Date

Aug 29, 2018

Category

Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)

Judge Hon. Monica Bachner Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Monica Bachner
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope