California Code of Regulations|§ 943 - Intent for Logging Roads, Landings, and Logging Road Watercourse Crossings

                                                

(a) All Logging Roads, Landings, and Logging Road Watercourse crossings in the Logging Area shall be planned, constructed, reconstructed, used, maintained, removed, abandoned, and deactivated in a manner that:
(1) Is consistent with long-term enhancement and maintenance of the forest resource.
(2) Accommodates appropriate Yarding systems.
(3) Is economically Feasible.
(b) Such planning, construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance, removal, Abandonment, and Deactivation shall occur in a manner that considers safety and avoids or substantially lessens significant adverse impacts to, among other things:
(1) Fish and wildlife habitat and Listed Species of fish and wildlife.
(2) Water quality and the Beneficial Uses of water.
(3) Soil resources.
(4) Significant archeological and historical sites.
(5) Air quality.
(6) Visual resources.
(7) Fire hazard.
(c) The RPF may propose exceptions to the Rules of this Article if explained and justified in the Plan and found by the Director not to result in a Significant Adverse Impact on the Environment.
(d) Exceptions may also be provided through application of Fish and Game Code § 1600 et seq. and shall be made an enforceable part of the Plan in accordance with 14 CCR §§ 1039, 1040, 1090.14, 1092.26, 1092.27, 1094.23, or 1094.24, as appropriate.
(e) For Watersheds with Listed Anadromous Salmonids and for Planning Watersheds immediately upstream of, and contiguous to, any watershed with listed anadromous salmonids all Logging Roads, Landings, and Logging Road Watercourse crossings shall be planned, designed, constructed and reconstructed, used, maintained, abandoned, deactivated, and removed in accordance with 14 CCR § 936.9(a).
(f) The provisions of Article 11 that apply in Watersheds with Listed Anadromous Salmonids and in Planning Watersheds immediately upstream of, and contiguous to, any watershed with listed anadromous salmonids shall not apply to a Plan that is subject to:
(1) A valid incidental take permit issued by CDFW pursuant to § 2081(b) of the Fish and Game Code that addresses anadromous salmonid protection; or
(2) A federal incidental take statement or incidental take permit that addresses anadromous salmonid protection, for which a consistency determination has been made pursuant to § 2080.1 of the Fish and Game Code; or
(3) A valid natural community conservation Plan that addresses anadromous salmonid protection approved by CDFW under § 2835 of the Fish and Game Code; or
(4) A valid Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) that addresses anadromous salmonid protection, approved under § 10 of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973; or
(5) Project revisions, guidelines, or take avoidance measures pursuant to a memorandum of understanding or a planning agreement entered into between the Plan submitter and CDFW in preparation of obtaining a natural community conservation Plan that addresses anadromous salmonid protection.

Notes

Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 14, § 943

Note: Authority cited: Sections 4551, 4551.5, 4553 and 4562.5, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 4512, 4551.5, 4562.5, 4562.7 and 4597, Public Resources Code; and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Arcata Natl. Corp. (1972) 59 Cal.App.3d 959, 131 Cal. Rptr. 172.

1. Amendment filed 7-3-86; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 86, No. 27).
2. Amendment of first paragraph and subsections (c), (d) and (g) filed 2-11-91; operative 3-13-91 (Register 91, No. 14).
3. Amendment of article and section headings, repealer and new section and amendment of Note filed 6-11-2014; operative 1/1/2015 pursuant to Public Resources Code section 4554.5 (Register 2014, No. 24).
4. Amendment of subsections (c) and (d) and amendment of Note filed 6-2-2017; operative 1/1/2018 pursuant to Public Resources Code section 4554.5(a) (Register 2017, No. 22).
5. Change without regulatory effect amending section filed 12-20-2017 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2017, No. 51).

View Latest Rulings

Therefore, the claim is not exempted by the reference in section 943 to the enforcement of contracts or express contractual provisions. Instead, the fourth cause of action is for breach of implied warranty. That cause of action is not “specifically set forth” in section 943. For both reasons, therefore, that claim is barred by the Right to Repair Act. The plaintiff relies on McMillin Albany LLC v.

  • Name

    TERRA LAGO COMMUNITY VS INDIO LAND VENTURES

  • Case No.

    RIC1513496

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

Thus, the Supreme Court’s holding in McMillin, as well as the express language of section 943(a), are not consistent with defendants’ position that breach of contract claims based on construction defects are barred by the Right to Repair Act, and indeed section 943(a) and McMillin both state that breach of contract claims are not covered by the Act.

  • Name

    BELINDA ARANA VS. K. HOVNANIAN AT VALLE DEL SOL, LLC / COMPLEX

  • Case No.

    19CECG04240

  • Hearing

    Apr 05, 2022

  • County

    Fresno County, CA

The Courts dismisses Plaintiffs' first and second causes of action for strict liability and negligence with prejudice on grounds that they are precluded by Civil Code section 943.

  • Name

    LINDY YANELLO VS. PFF PARTNERS LLC

  • Case No.

    56-2008-00318083-CU-OR-SIM

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2010

Defendant argues that the cause of action is 13 precluded by the exclusiveness of Civil Code section 943, subdivision (a). 14 Section 943 is part of the Right to Repair Act (the “Act”). (McMillin Albany LLC v. 15 Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 241, 247.) The Act sets forth detailed standards that the 16 components of a dwelling must satisfy and also established a prelitigation dispute resolution 17 process. (Ibid.)

  • Name

    MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC

  • Case No.

    20CV371309

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2021

In other words, section 944 identifies what damages may be recovered in an action under the Act, and section 943 establishes that such damages may only be recovered in an action under the Act, absent an express exception. The list of recoverable damages in section 944 and the list of exceptions in section 943 have different consequences for recovery of economic losses, personal injury damages, and property damages[.] (McMillin, supra, 4 Cal.5th at 251.)

  • Name

    DEREK ROHAN VS JAYBELL, LLC

  • Case No.

    19STCV45218

  • Hearing

    Jun 23, 2020

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

5 Files
Filed

Sep 20, 2012

Status

Active

Judge

Hon. Chapin, Sidney P. Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Chapin, Sidney P.

Court

Kern County

County

Kern County, CA

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Construction

7 Files
Filed

Oct 19, 2023

Court

Sacramento County

County

Sacramento County, CA

Category

Unlimited Civil

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Eminent Domain

6 Files
Filed

Nov 09, 2023

Court

Sacramento County

County

Sacramento County, CA

Category

Unlimited Civil

Practice Area

Property

Matter Type

Eminent Domain

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 7 pages

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 9 10 RONNY MAMARIAN; YUFAN KWONG; Case No.: 2015-1-CV-288222 OLIVIA & IGOR MAKARENKO; BRUCE & MW MARYAM YOUNESSI; LAM LE & NICA LE 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AFTER HEARING ON 13 AUGU…

Case Filed

Nov 18, 2015

Case Status

Dismissed

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Aug 08, 2016

Category

Construction Defect Unlimited (10)

Judge Hon. Thomas E. Kuhnle Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Thomas E. Kuhnle
preview-icon 4 pages

here nee = nh ae tan a Arana enemencmeminnatnataitNntiNAtenmARSINRNRCRNitOnnnnAsininenmimimen asta tt OO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-01-2011 2:33 pm Case Number: CGC-08-478453 Filing Date: Mar-01-2011 2:34 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03138181 ORDER SEACON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VS. CATELLUS THIRD AND KING LL 001003138181 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. a3/01/2011 ro FIRST LEGAL 4562…

County

San Francisco County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 01, 2011

Category

CONSTRUCTION

Judge Hon. Curtis E.A. Karnow Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Curtis E.A. Karnow
preview-icon 11 pages

EMMETT E. SELTZER, ESQ. (226598) HYUNKI JUNG, ESQ. (318887) BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE A Professional Corporation 555 12" Street, Suite 1800 Oakland, CA. 94607 Telephone: (510) 834-4350 Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 eseltzer@bjg.com jjung@bjg.com Attorneys for Defendants CIVIC RANCHO MEADOWS LLC, CIVIC RANCHO HILLS LLC, and DE NOVA HOMES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Case No. 17CV312388 Assigned to Hon. Brian C, Walsh JOSEPH A. & KELLY JO LAGUNA,…

Case Filed

Jun 29, 2017

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 27, 2018

Category

Construction Defect Unlimited (10)

Judge Hon. Brian C. Walsh Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian C. Walsh
preview-icon 10 pages

1 | MELSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North : 2 || Santa Monica, California 90405 fL, Ee Telephone: (310) 396-9600 Ea . 3 |} Fax: (310) 396-9635 ' - || Sarah L. Gough, SBN: 247220 NOV 05 2018 4 || Mayo L. Makarozyk, SBN 203035 . x SUPERION CoUaY one EN OFT 5 || Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Gop OF CONTE 6 Carlos & Nina Pinheiro, et al. 7 8 9 ° 10 11 YD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 14. 15 | CARLOS & NINA PINHEIRO, et. al., CASE NO.: C14-014…

Case Filed

Aug 01, 2014

Case Status

CONSOLIDATED 02/22/2016

County

Contra Costa County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 05, 2014

Judge Hon. Brian F. Haynes Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian F. Haynes
preview-icon 10 pages

= Oo Oe ND WH Bw WN 10 MILSTEIN ADELMAN, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 Telephone: (310) 396-9600 Fax: (310) 396-9635 Sarah L. Gough, SBN: 247220 Mayo L. Makarezyk, SBN 203035 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Carlos & Nina Pinheiro, et al. Ei NOV 05 2014 STEPHEN H.NASH CU sunnion Couat orton eae COUNTY OF CONTRA. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CARLOS & NINA PINHEIRO, et. al., Plaintiffs, vs. WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSI…

Case Filed

Aug 01, 2014

Case Status

CONSOLIDATED 02/22/2016

County

Contra Costa County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 05, 2014

Judge Hon. Brian F. Haynes Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian F. Haynes
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope