10/1/2020
Dept. 73
Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding
CLEAN ENERGY OF AMERICA GROUP, INC. v. SOUTHLAND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. (BC568285)
Counsel for Plaintiff/judgment creditor: Larry Rothman
MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT (filed 9/8/2020)
Judgment Creditor’s request for judicial notice is granted. The motion is denied without prejudice to judgment creditor’s refiling motion with additional evidence and for proper notice. Notice of the court location was given as Department 73 of the Los Angeles Superior Court located at 111 North Main Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, which is incorrect. Further, Judgment Creditor has not me its burden to amend the judgment. The only evidence offered to the court consists of:
· A copy of the judgment
· A secretary of state business search that only shows that Samuel Amit is the agent for service of process of Judgment Debtor and that the Judgment Debtor was suspended
· Post-judgment discovery that Judgment Creditor propounded on Judgment De
Hearing Date
October 01, 2020
Type
Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
10/1/2020
Dept. 73
Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding
CLEAN ENERGY OF AMERICA GROUP, INC. v. SOUTHLAND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. (BC568285)
Counsel for Plaintiff/judgment creditor: Larry Rothman
MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT (filed 9/8/2020)
Judgment Creditor’s request for judicial notice is granted. The motion is denied without prejudice to judgment creditor’s refiling motion with additional evidence and for proper notice. Notice of the court location was given as Department 73 of the Los Angeles Superior Court located at 111 North Main Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, which is incorrect. Further, Judgment Creditor has not me its burden to amend the judgment. The only evidence offered to the court consists of:
· A copy of the judgment
· A secretary of state business search that only shows that Samuel Amit is the agent for service of process of Judgment Debtor and that the Judgment Debtor was suspended
· Post-judgment discovery that Judgment Creditor propounded on Judgment De