Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department 53
paul barris , Plaintiff, vs. mitchell pletcher , et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC520643
Hearing Date: August 6, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
[Tentative] Order RE:
cross-complainant mitchell pletcher’s MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT in the amount of $50,615.00 and enter a new and different judgment in the amount of $1,000,000.00
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
MOVING PARTY: Cross-complainant Mitchell Pletcher
RESPONDING PARTY: n/a
Cross-Complainant Mitchell Pletcher’s Motion to Vacate Judgment in the Amount of $50,615.00 and Enter a New and Different Judgment in the Amount of $1,000,000.00
The court considered the moving papers. No opposition to the motion was filed.
Background
On October 22, 2013, cross-complainant Mitchell Pletcher (“Pletcher”) filed a cross-complaint in this action against cross-defendant Paul Barris (“Barris”), alleging causes of action for (1) intentional interference with prospective e
Hearing Date
August 06, 2019
Type
Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial 06/03/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles – Central District
Department 53
paul barris , Plaintiff, vs. mitchell pletcher , et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC520643
Hearing Date: August 6, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
[Tentative] Order RE:
cross-complainant mitchell pletcher’s MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT in the amount of $50,615.00 and enter a new and different judgment in the amount of $1,000,000.00
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
MOVING PARTY: Cross-complainant Mitchell Pletcher
RESPONDING PARTY: n/a
Cross-Complainant Mitchell Pletcher’s Motion to Vacate Judgment in the Amount of $50,615.00 and Enter a New and Different Judgment in the Amount of $1,000,000.00
The court considered the moving papers. No opposition to the motion was filed.
Background
On October 22, 2013, cross-complainant Mitchell Pletcher (“Pletcher”) filed a cross-complaint in this action against cross-defendant Paul Barris (“Barris”), alleging causes of action for (1) intentional interference with prospective e