1. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Moving Party: Attorneys for Plaintiff Brett Dahl. Responding Party: None
Ruling Motion 1: Attorney Benny Agosto, Jr.’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Moving party fails to show proof of service of the moving papers. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005; CRC 3.1300(c).)
Attorney Agosto’s verified application also fails to provide his residence address, show proof of service on the State Bar, or show proof of payment of the state bar fee, as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(d)(1), (e).
Moving party to give notice.
Ruling Motion 2: Attorney Ciro J. Sempari’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Moving party fails to show proof of service of the moving papers. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005; CRC 3.1300(c).)
Attorney Sempari’s verified application also fails to provide his residence address, show proof of service on the State Bar, or show proof of payment of the state bar fee, a