Preview
‘
- -
xv \I
CM-O1 0
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
LAW OFFICES 0F PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C.
Raymond A. Patenaude (#1 28855) / Stephanie J. Boone (#160182)
Angie Hong Hoar (#21 21 52) / Dean Keshavarz (# PL-496493)
9619 Chesapeake DrIve, SUIte 300, San Diego, CA 92123
R‘ORFCAUIfiT OF CAUFO‘S'SA
TELEPHONE No.; (858) 244—7600 FAx No.: (858) 836-0318 SUCPgUNTY 0F SAN BEwg‘TRchT
ATrORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF SAN BERNARDNO
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO JUL 0 2 2021
STREET ADDRESS: 247 WEST 3RD STREET
MAILING ADDRESS: 247 WEST 3RD STREET
\
CITY AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDINO CA 92415-0210
HARfiés‘é‘ibE‘PUT‘Y
BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO JUSTICE CENTER N
CASE NAME: CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC, ASSIGNEE OF SYNCHRONY BANK VS. SYLVIA
LOPEZ A/K/A SYLVIA P LOPEZ, A A ‘ fl Q n
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASE W:SB Z I I U l U
D Unlimited
(Amount
X (AmountLimited D Counter D
. I
Joinde,
JUDGE:
demanded FIled wnth first appearance by defendant
demanded is
DEPT. -
$25,000 or less) (Cal- Ru|es 0f Court, rule 3-402)
exceeds $25,000)
Items 1-5 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
E Auto (22) Breach of contract/warranty (06) D Eal. Rules of Court. rules
3-400-3-403)
E Uninsured motorist (46) E Rule 3.740 collections (09)
D
AntitrusUTrade regulation (03)
Other PIIPDIWD (Personal InjuryIProperty D Other collections (09)
D
C°”$tht'°n defeCt (1°)
DamageIWrongfuI Death) Tort D .nsurance coverage (18)
D
Mass ton (40)
D Asbestos (o4)
D Other contract (37)
Securities litigation (28)
Environmental/Toxic tort (30)
Product liability (24)
Real Property . . .
. .
Insuranoelcoverage qlalms ansmg from the
Medical malpractice (45) Eminent domain/Inverse above |4Is1ted
proviSIonally complex case
Other pl/PDIWD (23) condemnation (1 4) t yp es ( )
Non-PIIPDIWD (Other) Ton Wrongful eviction (33)
Enforcemem 0f Jqument
E Business tort/unfair business practice (07) Other real property (26)
Enforcement ofjudgment (20)
E .
CIVII
. .
fights (08) Unlawful Detalner
_
I
Miscellaneous
, _
Complalnt
I
E Defamation (13) D Commercial (31)
R'Co (27)
CIVII
E Fraud (16) D Residential (32)
Other complaint (not specified above) (42)
E Intellectual property (19) D Drugs (38) _
Miscellaneous
I _
CIVII Petltlon
_ _
E .
Prefess'onal neghgence (25)
. _
Jumcm' Rev'ew
_ _
Partnership and corporate governance (21)
E Other non_P|/PDNVD tort (35) Asget forfeiture. (05)
B Other petition (not specified above) (43)
Employment Petltion re: arbitration award (1 1)
Wrongful termination (36) Writ of mandate (02)
E Other employment (15) Other judicial review (39)
2. This case
judicial
D E
management:
is is not complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional
I
a. Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses
b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time—consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, or in a federal court
c. D
Substantial amountofdocumentary evidence f.
D Substantial post-judgmentjudicial supervision
3. Remedies sought(check allthatapply): a. monetary g b. D non-monetary; declaratory orinjunctive relief c. D punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): TWO
5.
6.
This case
If there are any
E
D known is is not a class action suit.
related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM—O15.)
D ate: May 24, 2021
[
RAYMOND A. PATENAUDE
] [ ]
STEPHANIE J. BOONE
[
ANGIE HONG HOAR
]
M DEAN KESHAVARZ
>
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE 0F :ARTY 0R ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
under the Probate
- Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed
Code, Family Code, or We|fare and Institutions Code). (CaL Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result
in sanctions.
- File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
- If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the California RuIes
of Court. you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the
action or proceeding.
' Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheetwill be used for statistical purposes only.
Page 1 of 2 ‘
Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3.400-3.403, 3‘740;
Form Adopted for Mandakory Use CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Standards of Judicial Administration, s‘d. 3.10
Judicial Council of California
www.courtinfo.ca.gov
CM-010 [Rev. July 1, 2007]
CA_01M2 Civil Case Cover P&F File No. 20-39766
x
~ '
\r \r
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET
To Plaintiffs and Others Filing First Papers. If you are filing a a civil case, you must complete and
first paper (for example, a complaint) in
file, along with your first paper, the Civil be used to compile statistics about the
Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. This information will
types and numbers of cases filed. You must complete items 1 through 6 on the sheet. In item 1, you must check one box for the case type
that best describes the case. If the case fits both a general and a more specific type of case listed in item 1. check the more specific one. If
the case has multiple causes of action, check the box that best indicates the primary cause of action. To assist you completing the sheet.
examples of the cases that belong under each case type in item 1 are provided below. A cover sheet must be filed only with your initial
paper. You do not need to submit a cover sheet with amended papers. Failure to file a cover sheet with the first paper filed in a civil case
may subject a party, its counsel, or both to sanctions under rules 2.30 and 3.220 of the California Rules of Court.
To Parties Rule 3.740 Collection Cases. A "collection case‘ Under rule 3.740 is defined as an action for recovery of money owed in a
in
sum stated be certain that is not more than $25,000, exclusive of interest and attorney's fees, arising from a transaction in which property,
to
services, or money was acquired on credit. A collections case does not include an action seeking the following: (1) tort damages, (2) punitive
damages, (3) recovery of real property, (4) recovery of personal property, or (5) a prejudgment writ of attachment. The identification of a case
as rule 3.740 collections case on this form means that it wi|| be exempt form the general time—for-service requirements and case
management rules, unless a defendant files a responsive pleading. A rule 3.740 collections case will be subject to the requirements for
service and obtaining a judgment in rule 3.740.
To Parties in complex cases only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover Sheet to designate whether the case is
Complex Cases. In
complex. If a plaintiff is complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court, this must be indicated by completing the
believes the case
appropriate boxes in items 1 and 2. If a plaintiff designates a case as complex, the cover sheet must be served with the complaint on all
parties to the action. A defendant may file and serve no later than the time of its first appearance a joinder in the plaintiff's designation, a
counter—designation that the case is not complex, or, if the plaintiff has made no designation, a designation that the case is complex.
CASE TYPES AND EXAMPLES
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation (Cal.
Auto (22)—Persona| Injury/Property Breach of Contract/Warranty (06) Rules of Court Rules 3.400-3.403)
DamageNVrongfuI Death Breach of Rental/Lease AntitrustlTrade Regulation (03)
Uninsured Motorist (46) (If the Contract (not unlawful detainer or Construction Defect (10)
case involves an uninsured motorist wrongful eviction) Claims Involving Mass Tort (40)
claim subject to Contract/Warranty Breach—Seller Securities Litigation (28)
arbitration, check this item Plaintiff (not fraud or negligence) Environmental/Toxic Tort (30)
instead ofAuto) Negligent Breach of Contract] Warranty Insurance Coverage Claims
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (arisingfrom provisionally
Other PIIPDNVD (Personal Injuryl Property
Collections (e.g., money owed, open book complex case type listed above)
DamageNVrongful Death)
accounts) (09) (41)
Tort
Collection Case—Seller Plaintiff
Asbestos (04) Enforcement of Judgment
Other Promissory Note/Collections
Asbestos Property Damage Enforcement of Judgment (20)
Case
Asbestos Personal Injury/ Abstract of Judgment ( Out of
Insurance Coverage (notprovisionally
Wrongful Death County)
complex) (1 8)
Product Liability (not asbestos or Confession of Judgment (non-
Auto Subrogation
toxic/environmental) (24) domestic relations)
Other Coverage
Medical Malpractice (45) Sister State Judgment
Other Contract (37)
Medical Malpractice—
Contractual Fraud
Administrative Agency Award
Physicians & Surgeons (not unpaid taxes)
Other Contract Dispute
Other Professional Health Care Petition/Certification of Entry of
Malpractice Real Property Judgment on Unpaid Taxes
Other PI/PDNVD (23) Eminent Domain/lnverse Condemnation Other Enforcement of Judgment
Premises Liability (e.g., slip (1 4) Case
and fall) Wrongful Eviction (33)
Injury/PDNVD Other Real Property (e.g., quite tifle) (26) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
Intentional Bodily
vandalism) Wn't of Possession of Real Property RICO (27)
(e.g., assault,
Mortgage Foreclosure Other Complaint (not specified
Intentional lnfliction of
Emotional Distress Quite Title above) (42)
Other Real Property (not eminent Declaratory Relief Only
Negligent lnfliction of
Injunctive Relief Only (non-
Emotional Distress domain, Iandlord/tenant, or foreclosure)
harassment)
Other Pl/PDNVD
Unlawful Detainer Mechanics Lien
Non-Pl/PDNVD (Other) Tort Commercial (31) Other Commercial Complaint
Business Tort/U nfair Business Residential (32) (non-tort/non-complex)
Practice Drugs (38) (if the case involves illegal
Rights drugs, check this item; otherwise, report Miscel'anews CiV" Petitim‘
Civil (e.g., discrimination,
as Commercial or Residential) Partnership and Corporate
false arrest) (no! civil
Governance (21)
harassment) (08) Judicial Review Other Petition (not specified above)
Defamation (e.g., slander, libel)
Asset Forfeiture (05) (43)
(13) Petition Re: Arbitration Award (1 1) Civil Harassment
Fraud (16) Writ of Mandate (02) Workplace Violence
Property (19)
Intellectual
Writ—Administrative Mandamus EIder/Dependent Adult
Professional Negligence (25) Writ—Mandamus on Limited Court Abuse
Legal Malpractice
Case Matter Election Contest
Other Professional Malpractice Writ—Other Limited Court Case Petition for Name Change
(non medical or legal) Review Petition for Relief from Late
Other Non-PI/PD/WD Tort (35) Other Judicial Review (39) Claim
Employment Review of Health Officer Order Other Civil Petition
Wrongful Termination (36) Notice of Appeal—Labor
Other Employment (1 5) Commissioner Appeals
Page Z of2
CM-010 [Rev. January 1, 2007] CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
CA_01M2 Civil Case Cover P&F File No. 20-39766
Related Content
in San Bernardino County
Case
Print
Jul 15, 2024 |
Wilfred J Schneider, Jr.
|
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422674
Case
Capital One N.a. -v- Verdin Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
. TBD |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422834
Case
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-03604
23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez
Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted
Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the
court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0051944
S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged
Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,
default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker,
Deram K
Ruling
PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC VS. CHRISTINA RANGEL ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC17559532
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 1. PLAINTIFF PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC's HEARING ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTION. Continued to August 6, 2024 on the court's motion. =(302/CK)
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES
Jul 27, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300997
DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300997
CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CV-23-006622
CV-23-006622 – DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL – Plaintiff Discover Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and unopposed.
The Court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the answer and complaint filed in this case. The answer admits all allegations in the complaint as true and does not assert any affirmative defenses.
Based on the pleadings, the Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against the defendant, and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(A).) Defendant, who did not oppose this motion, has not given the Court any reason to grant leave to amend. (Cf. Today's IV, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 1137, 1176, reh'g denied (Oct. 25, 2022), review denied (Jan. 18, 2023).)
Consequently, the unopposed motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court will sign the proposed order and the proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff. Court trial date to be vacated.
Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.
Ruling
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. Castro
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CVG-00362
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., VS. CASTRO
Case Number: 23CVG-00362
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Terminating Sanctions: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. moves
for terminating sanctions by striking Defendant Vincent Castro’s answer. Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the
amount of $1,572.75 for each motion.
Procedural Defect: As a procedural matter, this motion was served both via mail and email on May 9, 2024, and
set for a hearing date of June 7, 2024. CCP § 1005(b) requires all moving papers be served 16 court days before
the hearing. This notice period is extended by five calendar days if the motion is served by mail. Id. For service
by email, the notice period is extended by two court days. CCP § 1010.6(a)(3). This timeframe is calculated by
counting backwards from the hearing date but excluding the hearing date. CCP § 12c.
Starting with the June 7, 2024, hearing date and counting backwards 16 court days (excluding the Court holiday
of May 27, 2024) then five calendar days for out of state mailing this matter should have been served by mail no
later than, May 4, 2024. For email the last day to serve the motion was April 24, 2024. The motion was served
on May 7, 2024, and was untimely under either calculation. Based on insufficient statutory notice, the motion is
denied.
Merits of Motion: Even if the motion had been timely noticed, terminating sanctions are not warranted.
Terminating sanctions are a “drastic penalty and should be used sparingly.” Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract
Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 604. A terminating sanction should not generally be
imposed by the court until less severe sanctions have been attempted and were unsuccessful. Id. No justification
has been provided as to why terminating sanctions are appropriate in this context instead of lesser evidentiary or
issue sanctions. Without additional evidence, terminating sanctions would be premature.
The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the
denial.
Review Hearing: This matter is also on calendar for review regarding trial re-setting. The Court designates this
matter as a Plan II case and intends on setting it for trial no later than October 15, 2024. An appearance is
necessary on today’s calendar to discuss available trial dates.
Ruling
Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
23CV-0201860
ET AL.
Case Number: 23CV-0201860
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff and
Plaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20,
2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff and
Counsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctions
have not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would not
be effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate
Order of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
******************************************************************************
9:00 a.m. Review Hearings
******************************************************************************
Ruling
Sierra Central Credit Union vs. Goodwin
Jul 23, 2024 |
23CVG-00253
SIERRA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION VS. GOODWIN
Case Number: 23CVG-00253
This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement
informing the Court that the stay is still in effect. The matter is continued to Tuesday, January 23, 2025 at 9:00
a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Martinez Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
Tanada, Stephanie |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422781
Document
Bank Of America N.a. -v- Robledo Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Stephanie Thornton-Harris |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422569
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560