On November 19, 2020 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Brilliant, Barry,
Hoheneck-Smith, Dagmar K.,
and
Black, Deanne G.,
Black Knight Vineyards, Llc,
Black, Mitchell G.,
for 26: Unlimited Other Real Property
in the District Court of Sonoma County.
Preview
1 DAVIN R. BACHO (SBN 282613)
CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY
2 3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
3 Telephone: (707) 523-1181
4 Facsimile: (707) 546-1360
dbacho@cfk.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barry Brilliant
6 and Dagmar K. Hoheneck-Smith
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
COUNTY OF SONOMA
9
10 BARRY BRILLIANT, an individual; and Case No. SCV-267406
DAGMAR K. HOHENECK-SMITH, an
11 individual and as trustee of THE DAGMAR [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
HOHENECK-SMITH TRUST dated PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE
12 December 14, 2010, APPLICATION FOR STIPULATED
TRIAL CONTINUANCE
13 Plaintiffs,
Date: April 7, 2022
14 vs. Time: 10:30 A.M.
Dept: 18
15 MITCHELL G. BLACK, an individual and Judge: Honorable Jennifer V. Dollard
dba BLACK KNIGHT VINEYARDS;
16 DEANNE G. BLACK, an individual and
dba BLACK KNIGHT VINEYARDS; and (Unlimited Civil)
17 DOES ONE through TWENTY, inclusive,
18 Defendants.
19
20 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS
21
22
23 After reviewing and considering the Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application and any opposition
24 submitted on April 7, 2022 in Courtroom 18, with good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered
25 that Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application is GRANTED.
26 The Court further orders the following:
27 ////
28 ////
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE
1 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the trial of this matter currently set for June 3,
2 2022, is vacated. All deadlines will trail the new trial date. A case management conference is now set
3 for __________________; or, will be set by the Court with subsequent notice to the parties in order to
4 determine the new trial date.
5 Dated: __________________
____________________________________
6 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE
Document Filed Date
April 07, 2022
Case Filing Date
November 19, 2020
Category
26: Unlimited Other Real Property
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 DAVIN R. BACHO (SBN 282613) CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY 2 3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 3 Telephone: (707) 523-1181 4 Facsimile: (707) 546-1360 dbacho@cfk.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barry Brilliant 6 and Dagmar K. Hoheneck-Smith 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SONOMA 9 10 BARRY BRILLIANT, an individual; and Case No. SCV-267406 DAGMAR K. HOHENECK-SMITH, an 11 individual and as trustee of THE DAGMAR [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING HOHENECK-SMITH TRUST dated PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE 12 December 14, 2010, APPLICATION FOR STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE 13 Plaintiffs, Date: April 7, 2022 14 vs. Time: 10:30 A.M. Dept: 18 15 MITCHELL G. BLACK, an individual and Judge: Honorable Jennifer V. Dollard dba BLACK KNIGHT VINEYARDS; 16 DEANNE G. BLACK, an individual and dba BLACK KNIGHT VINEYARDS; and (Unlimited Civil) 17 DOES ONE through TWENTY, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 21 22 23 After reviewing and considering the Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application and any opposition 24 submitted on April 7, 2022 in Courtroom 18, with good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered 25 that Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application is GRANTED. 26 The Court further orders the following: 27 //// 28 //// 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE 1 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the trial of this matter currently set for June 3, 2 2022, is vacated. All deadlines will trail the new trial date. A case management conference is now set 3 for __________________; or, will be set by the Court with subsequent notice to the parties in order to 4 determine the new trial date. 5 Dated: __________________ ____________________________________ 6 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STIPULATED TRIAL CONTINUANCE