On September 09, 2019 a Party Statement was filed involving a dispute between Hunter Lenthe, Jeffrey Zapper, Julie Zapper, Lenthe, Hunter, Lenthe, Mycalah, Mycalah Lenthe, and East Bay Motorsports Inc., East Bay Motorsports, Inc., Yamaha Motor Co, Ltd, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Yamaha Motor Corporation, Usa Inc, Yamaha Motor Corporation, Usa, Inc., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation Of America, Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation Of America,, for Unlimited Civil in the District Court of Alameda County.
January 07, 2020
September 09, 2019
Unlimited Civil
02/01/2024 03:00 PM Party
03/05/2024 03:00 PM Party
07/02/2024 03:00 PM Party
09/29/2023 09:30 AM Party
10/06/2023 09:00 AM Party
10/20/2023 09:00 AM Party
11/13/2023 09:00 AM Party
ADAMS, LINDSEY R. Attorneys for Defendants
Andrew Paul McDevitt Att
Andrew Paul McDevitt Attorney
Andrew Paul McDevitt Party
Andrew Ratto Att
Andrew Ratto Attorney
Andrew Ratto Party
CEREGHINI, PAUL G. Attorney
Chancellor W. Tseng Att
Chancellor W. Tseng Attorney
Chancellor W. Tseng Attorney (lead Attorney)
Chancellor W. Tseng Party
Dontan Hart Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
Dontan Hart Party
Dwayne Burns Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
Dwayne Burns Party
East Bay Motorsports Inc. Def
East Bay Motorsports Inc. Defendant
East Bay Motorsports Inc. Party
East Bay Motorsports, Inc. Def
East Bay Motorsports, Inc. Defendant
East Bay Motorsports, Inc. Party
EAST BAY MOTORSPORTS, INC. Defendant
Hunter Lenthe Party
Hunter Lenthe Plain
Hunter Lenthe Plaintiff
Jeffery Warren Att
Jeffery Warren Attorney
Jeffery Warren Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
Jeffery Warren Party
Jeffrey Zapper Party
Jeffrey Zapper Plain
Jeffrey Zapper Plaintiff
John W. Knottnerus Att
John W. Knottnerus Attorney
John W. Knottnerus Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
John W. Knottnerus Party
Julie Zapper Party
Julie Zapper Plain
Julie Zapper Plaintiff
Katharine H. Adams Att
Katharine H. Adams Attorney
Katharine H. Adams Former Attorney (former Attorney)
Katharine H. Adams Party
KLIEBENSTEIN, NEIL M Attorney
KNOTTNERUS, JOHN W. Attorney
Larry Edward Cook Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Larry Edward Cook Attorney
Larry Edward Cook Party
LENTHE, HUNTER Plaintiff
LENTHE, MYCALAH Plaintiff
Lindsey R. Adams Attorneys for Defendants
Lindsey R. Adams Attorney
Lindsey R. Adams Attorney (lead Attorney)
Lindsey R. Adams Party
Mary Katherine Back Attorneys for Defendants
Mary Katherine Back Attorney
Mary Katherine Back Former Attorney (former Attorney)
Mary Katherine Back Party
Mycalah Lenthe Party
Mycalah Lenthe Plain
Mycalah Lenthe Plaintiff
Neil Kliebenstein Attorney
Neil Matthew Kliebenstein Att
Neil Matthew Kliebenstein Attorney (lead Attorney)
Neil Matthew Kliebenstein Party
Paul G. Cereghini Att
Paul G. Cereghini Attorney
Paul G. Cereghini Attorney (associated Attorney)
Paul G. Cereghini Party
PURCELL, THOMAS Attorney
Richard Henry Schoenberger Att
Richard Henry Schoenberger Attorney (lead Attorney)
Richard Henry Schoenberger Party
Richard H. Schoenberger Attorney
Robert E. Cartwright, Jr. Att
Robert E. Cartwright, Jr. Attorney
Robert E. Cartwright, Jr. Attorney (lead Attorney)
Robert E. Cartwright, Jr. Party
Robert E. Cartwright, JR. - Jr. Attorney (lead Attorney)
SCHOENBERGER, RICHARD H. Attorney
Thomas Purcell Att
Thomas Purcell Attorney
Thomas Purcell Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
Thomas Purcell Party
Trevor Carolan Attorney (pro Hac Vice)
Trevor Carolan Party
Yamaha Motor Co, Ltd Def
Yamaha Motor Co, Ltd Defendant
Yamaha Motor Co, Ltd Party
Yamaha Motor Co., LTD. Def
Yamaha Motor Co., LTD. Defendant
Yamaha Motor Co., LTD. Party
YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD. Defendant
Yamaha Motor corporation, USA Inc Def
Yamaha Motor corporation, USA Inc Defendant
Yamaha Motor corporation, USA Inc Party
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Inc. Def
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Inc. Defendant
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Inc. Party
YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, USA, INC. Defendant
Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America Defendant
Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Def
Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Defendant
Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Party
YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant
Daniel Schrader Attorneys for Defendants
Mary Bedard Attorneys for Defendants
Richard Heilbron Attorney
Kyle Clawson Attorneys for Defendants
Christopher Real Attorney
NEIL KLIEBENSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Way-Chan Tseng Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Howard Strong Attorney
Audrey Siegel Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Daniel Rodman Attorneys for Defendants
Jennifer Rodriguez Attorney
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
a N | aml Neil M. Kliebenstein (#226060) FILED BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP 1741 Technology Drive, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95110-1364 ALAMEDA COUNTY Telephone: (408) 279-5393 Facsimile: (408) 279-5845 AUG 27 2021 Neil. kliebenstein@bowmanandbrooke.com CLERK ys see, COURT Paul G. Cereghini (#148016) BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP ) Deputy 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1600 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2736 Telephone: (602) 643-2300 Facsimile: (602) 248-0947 Paul.cereghini@bowmanandbrooke.com John W. Knottnerus (Pro Hac Vice) Thomas Purcell (Pro Hac Vice) 10 MB Law Group 117 SW Taylor, Suite 200 11 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 220-4287 12 Facsimile: (360) 606-6788 jknottnerus@mbliglaw.com 13 tpurcell@mbiglaw.com 14 Attorneys for Defendants Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., 15 Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and 16 East Bay Motorsports, Inc. - 17 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE! STATE OF CALIFORNIA YW4 AG 18 | COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 19 HUNTER LENTHE and MYCALAH LENTHE, Case No. RG19034284 20 Related to: Case No. HG19046425 ee Plaintiffs, ee 21 YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., ee VS. YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING ee 22 CORPORATION OF AMERICA } ee YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, USA, YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD. AND | - ee | 23 INC., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING EAST BAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.'S CASE . ee CORPORATION OF AMERICA, YAMAHA MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ee 24 MOTOR CO., LTD., EAST BAY ee MOTORSPORTS, INC. and DOES ONE Date: September 2, 2021 ee 25 through ONE HUNDRED, Time: 3:00 p.m. ee Dept.: 25 ee 26 Defendants. _ ee Assigned to: ee 27 JEFFREY ZAPPER and JULIE ZAPPER, Henorable James Reilly; Dept 25 ee ee 28 24997046 YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD. AND EAST BAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ros © o, @ Plaintiffs, ee VS. ee ee YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, USA, . INC., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING ee CORPORATION OF AMERICA, YAMAHA ee MOTOR CO., LTD., EAST BAY ee MOTORSPORTS, INC. and DOES ONE ee through ONE HUNDRED, ee ee Defendants. eee Pursuant to the August 4 1, 2021 Case Management Order Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and 10 East Bay Motorsports, Inc. (collectively "Defendants”) submit this Case Management Statement. 11 Defendants’ position on the issues raised at the last CMC are: 12 ° Consolidation for Trial: Defendants agree the cases should be consolidated for trial. 13 . Mediation: Defendants agree to mediate with a mutually agreeable mediator. Some mediators who came up in discussions with plaintiffs’ counsel were Bill Smith, Mike 14 Orenstil, Matt Conant, and Arnie Levison. Bill Smith is Defendant’s suggestion. 15 . Trial date: Defendants agree the January 10, 2022 trial date should be continued and understand all parties agree on that point. Defendants request the case be continued 16 to November 15, 2022 because: 1) this will accommodate the trial schedules of Defendants’ trial counsel; 2) all the parties want an in person jury trial and a later date 17 will make that more likely without a further continuance. 18 Defendants also propose an early expert disclosure, and that it be 100 days before trial 19 assuming a November 15, 2022 trial date. 20 Defendants discussed these issues with plaintiff counsel a sent a follow up email attached as 21 Ex. A. 22 Dated: August 27, 2021 BOWMAN D 23 \AQs 24 t ‘Neil M. Kliebenstein © Attorneys for Defendants 25 . | Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of 26 America, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and East Bay ' Motorsports, Inc. 27 28 24997046_- 2 | ‘ YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA YAMAHA MOTOR CoO., LTD. AND EAST BAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT f ro @ 3 . T Hunter Lenthe, et al. v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Inc., et al. Case No. RG19034284 Jeffrey Zapper, et al. v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Inc., etal. . Case No. HG19046425 PROOF OF SERVICE | am over 18 years of age, not a party to this action and employed in San Jose, California at 1741 Technology Drive, Suite 200, San Jose, California 95110-1355. On August 27, 2021, | served the foregoing documents described as YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A.. YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD. AND EAST BAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.’S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT by the means as follows: Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 Hunter Lenthe and Mycalah Lenthe Richard H. Schoenberger 11 Andrew P. McDevitt Walkup Melodia Kelly & Schoenberger 12 650 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108-2515 13 415.981.7210 Fax: 415. 391-6965 14 Assistant: Ashley Freeman rschoenberger@walkuplawoffice.com 15 amcdevitt@walkuplawoffice.com afreeman@walkuplawoffice.com 16 Imccombe@WalkupLawOffice.com 17 Larry E. Cook Casper Meadows Schwartz & Cook 18 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 1020 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 ; 19 925.947.1147 Fax: 925.947.1131 20 Assistant: Shannon Bowers cook@cmslaw.com 21 shannon@cmslaw.com | 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jeffrey Zapper and Julie Zapper { 23 Robert E. Cartwright, Jr. ; | Andrew Ratto . The Cartwright Law Firm, Inc. 24 222 Front Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 25 Vicki Rungo; Rebekka Moore 26 rob@cartwrightlaw.com Andrew@cartwrightlaw.com 27 vicki@cartwrightlaw.com rebekka@cartwrightlaw.com 28 | ; 7 So Se @ ~ oes | , @ VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL. | caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at San Jose, —_ California, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid thereof. | am readily familiar with the firm's business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. The mail is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. | am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date i is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. | ___ VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY SERVICE. The documents were enveloped, properly labeled, and caused to be deposited into an overnight delivery (Federal Express, United Parcel Service, etc.) receptacle or delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the express service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or a package designated by the express service carrier with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the case and served on that person; otherwise, at that person's place of residence. X__ ONLY BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Only by e-mailing the document(s) to the persons at the e-mail address(es) listed above based on stipulation between the parties on 10 March 12, 2020 and March 13, 2020, during the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, this office is working remotely, unable to send physical mail, and is therefore only using electronic mail. No 11 electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful was received within a reasonable time after the transmission. | 12 __ VIAFACSIMILE TRANSMISSION. The document was served on the above party in 13 this action by causing a true copy of said document to be transmitted by facsimile to the number listed adjacent to the name on this Proof of Service. The transmission was reported as 14 complete and without error. | 15 VIA PERSONAL SERVICE. |! caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand this date to the offices of the addressee(s). 16 | | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 17 is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on August 27, 2021, at San Jose, California. 18 19 20 21 22 23 | 24 25 26 | 27 28