On October 21, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Summit Associates, Ltd., An Afghanistan Corporation,
Summit Associates, Ltd., A New York Corporation,
and
Abdul Rahman Yamrali,
for M50 - Misc - Declaratory Judgment
in the District Court of New Haven County.
Preview
ORDER 421279
DOCKET NO: NNHCV196097196S SUPERIOR COURT
SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, LTD., A NEW JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN
YORK CORPORATION Et Al AT NEW HAVEN
V.
YAMRALI, ABDUL RAHMAN 1/18/2022
ORDER
ORDER REGARDING:
08/27/2021 145.00 OBJECTION TO MOTION
The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
ORDER: SUSTAINED
See court's ruling on motion to reargue (Docket Entry Nos. 143, 148).
Short Calendar Results Automated Mailing (SCRAM) Notice was sent on the underlying motion.
421279
Judge: ROBIN LYNN WILSON
This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
NNHCV196097196S 1/18/2022 Page 1 of 1
Document Filed Date
January 18, 2022
Case Filing Date
October 21, 2019
Category
M50 - Misc - Declaratory Judgment
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
ORDER 421279 DOCKET NO: NNHCV196097196S SUPERIOR COURT SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, LTD., A NEW JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN YORK CORPORATION Et Al AT NEW HAVEN V. YAMRALI, ABDUL RAHMAN 1/18/2022 ORDER ORDER REGARDING: 08/27/2021 145.00 OBJECTION TO MOTION The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby: ORDER: SUSTAINED See court's ruling on motion to reargue (Docket Entry Nos. 143, 148). Short Calendar Results Automated Mailing (SCRAM) Notice was sent on the underlying motion. 421279 Judge: ROBIN LYNN WILSON This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical (pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4. NNHCV196097196S 1/18/2022 Page 1 of 1