On March 06, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
1World Online, Inc., A California Corporation,
and
Blockchain Generation, An Unknown Business Entity,
Does1 Through 50,Inclusive,
Grimm, Matthew,
for (06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
\Wb<\a\ Onhxxt) jaw”) CiVNo. gock :0 H g!
Plaintiffs,
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
vs. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE,
@001 ax“ Om C9 mgmgdm \
22c 0,0 -) As THE ACTION Is NOT YET
“AT ISUE”
Defendants.
F I EA LEE ID)
SAN MATEO OUNTY
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: JUL 0" 2~ 2020
THE COURT FINDS as follows: Cw"-
,J j???"gDE/“3699””
'UTY CLERK
'
An initial Case Management Conference was previously ordered and scheduled
for July 1Q, 2020 in this action.
Pursuant to Rule 3.722(d) of the California Rules of Court, based upon the
Court’s review of the led Case Management Statement(s) and the docket of this action,
the Court determines that appearances at the Conference are not necessary at this time, as
this action is not yet “at issue”; and determines that the Case Management Conference
should be continued.
Pursuant tO CRC Rule 3. l 10(b), a plaintiff is required to serve the Summons and
Complaint upon all named defendants and le proofs of service of process upon all of
those defendants within 60 days after the ling of the Complaint.
Plaintiff has failed to le proofs of service of the Summons and
Complaint upon all Defendants.
_ Plaintiff has led proofs of service of the Summons and Complaint
upon all Defendants, yet not all Defendants have led an appearance in
this action and/or had a Default entered against them.
_ Plaintiffhas led proofs of service of the Summons and Complaint
upon all Defendants, but not all Defendants have led an Answer and/or
had a Default entered against them.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. As this action is not yet “at issue”, the initial Case Management
Conference is CONTINUED to October 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 11 of this
Court, located at Courtroom 2D, 400 County Center, Redwood City, California.
2. No later than 30 days prior to the date of this initial Case Management
Conference, the parties must meet and confer, in person or by telephone, to consider each
of the issues identied in CRC Rule 3.721 and Rule 3.727.
3. Pursuant to CRC Rule 3.725, no later than 15 days prior to the date of
this initial Case Management Conference, each party must file and serve a new Case
1
.
if rj“;
‘l
"/;~i/
..’.._;«,
I
.
i
‘'.nv,”
..
1" A.(I .
__;\;
'
aw74' 7
y
‘Jx
r ”41? .J ,
Management Statement, individually or jointly, using the Judicial Council
mandatory form CM-110. However, it would facilitate the issuance of a case
management order without an appearance at the Case Management Conference if you
would le and serve your Case Management twenty—ve (25) days before the Case
Management Conference.
4. After all parties have made a formal appearance in this action, the parties
may directly proceed to an Appropriate Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) process by ling a
Stipulation to ADR and Proposed Order (Local Form ADR-CV-l). If all parties le a
completed Stipulation to ADR and Proposed Order at least ten (1 0)calendar days prior to
the date of this initial Case Management Conference, the Case Management Conference
will be vacated (i.e., taken off the Court’s calendar), and this action will be referred to the
ADR Director.
5. Pursuant to Local Rule 0.2, Local Rule 2.3(m), and CRC Rule 2.30, the
Court is empowered to impose monetary sanctions of a minimum of $150.00 upon any
party or their counsel for failure to follow the requirements of this Order, or of the
California Rules of Court, or of the Code of Civil Procedure. If you fail to follow the
requirements of this Order, you will be subject to an order to show cause as to why
monetary sanctions of $150.00, or some other amount, should not be imposed against
you.
6. PLAINTIFF(S) must serve this Order on all parties not listed on the
Court’s proof of service within ve (5) days of the date of this Order.
DATED: July 4,, 2020
MARIE s. WEINER
JUDGE 0F THE SUPERIOR COURT
Document Filed Date
July 02, 2020
Case Filing Date
March 06, 2020
Category
(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.