On November 26, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Runyon, Nathan Peter,
and
Does 1-50, Inclusive,
Ng, Kaiser,
Payward, Inc., A California Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
oem IN DH RF BN
a a a ea ka
oN DH Hw BF YW NH |= SO
CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (SBN 222529)
GREGORY W. STEVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN, P.C.
100 PINE Naweo. SUITE 0 F DB
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9411
TELEPHONE: (415) 580- 6019 Suparier Goat of Calfomia
FACSIMILE: (415) 745- 3301
AUG 2 6 2021
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Nathan Peter Runyon OM, OF of COURT
BY
Daputy oh
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
NATHAN PETER RUNYON, CASE NO. CGC-19-581099
Plaintiff,
v. PROPOSE, ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE
PAY WARD, INC., a California Corporation LATE-FILING
d/b/a KRAKEN; and KAISER NG an
individual and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Date: Augusl J, 2021
Time 9:30 a.th.
Defendant. Dept.: 302
Judge: The Hon. Ethan P. Schulman
Action Filed: November 26, 2019
Trial Date: September 13, 2021
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE LATE FILINGoem YN DW be wW HN &
a a a
BRXRRRERKRKRRESeSeWABDREERESS
Plaintiffs unopposed motion is granted. Although plaintiffs opposition papers were filed
one day late, they were timely served on Defendants, Defendants have not objected to the late filing,
and have filed reply papers. Accordingly, the Court has considered plaintiff's opposition papers in
ruling on defendants’ motion.
So Ordered
Prasoat 06,
Fah bok Li ——
v" Hon. Ethan P. Schulman
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE LATE-FILING
Document Filed Date
August 26, 2021
Case Filing Date
November 26, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
oem IN DH RF BN a a a ea ka oN DH Hw BF YW NH |= SO CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (SBN 222529) GREGORY W. STEVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN, P.C. 100 PINE Naweo. SUITE 0 F DB SAN FRANCISCO, CA 9411 TELEPHONE: (415) 580- 6019 Suparier Goat of Calfomia FACSIMILE: (415) 745- 3301 AUG 2 6 2021 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Nathan Peter Runyon OM, OF of COURT BY Daputy oh SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO NATHAN PETER RUNYON, CASE NO. CGC-19-581099 Plaintiff, v. PROPOSE, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE PAY WARD, INC., a California Corporation LATE-FILING d/b/a KRAKEN; and KAISER NG an individual and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Date: Augusl J, 2021 Time 9:30 a.th. Defendant. Dept.: 302 Judge: The Hon. Ethan P. Schulman Action Filed: November 26, 2019 Trial Date: September 13, 2021 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE LATE FILINGoem YN DW be wW HN & a a a BRXRRRERKRKRRESeSeWABDREERESS Plaintiffs unopposed motion is granted. Although plaintiffs opposition papers were filed one day late, they were timely served on Defendants, Defendants have not objected to the late filing, and have filed reply papers. Accordingly, the Court has considered plaintiff's opposition papers in ruling on defendants’ motion. So Ordered Prasoat 06, Fah bok Li —— v" Hon. Ethan P. Schulman JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCUSE LATE-FILING