How to Get Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Useful Rulings on Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Recent Rulings on Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

PAUL HORN VS FUTURE MOTION, INC., ET AL.

CASE NO: 20STCV16629 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. December 3, 2020 Defendant, Future Motion, Inc, seeks an order permitting John J. Wackman to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this action. An out-of-state lawyer, not admitted to practice in California, may be admitted pro hac vice—i.e., to appear and take part in a particular action only. Applications for such admission are generally heard as law and motion matters.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

ACRISURE OF CALIFORNIA LLC VS MARK WOOD

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE E. Joseph D’Andrea of Squire Patton Boggs seeks to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant Mark Wood in this action. An attorney in good standing in another jurisdiction who is not be a resident of California, regularly employed in California, or regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in California may apply to appear as counsel pro hac vice in California. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40(a).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

NOVACOAST INC. V. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, ET AL.

Robert Harrington; filed 3/5; an attorney at law; counsel of record in this litigation, admitted pro hac vice; personally aware of the matters set forth in this Declaration or have gained knowledge of such facts from the file and, if called upon as a witness, could and would competently testify to the facts stated herein; Defendants conducted a deposition of Margaret Lloyd Savenelli (FKA Emmy Curtin) on December 17, 2019; copies of pertinent pages of the transcript of the deposition of Ms.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

BETTS VS ONEWEST BANK NA

The unopposed application of attorney Ian Hicks to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs is granted. CRC 9.40.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

BETTS VS ONEWEST BANK NA

The unopposed application of attorney Ian Hicks to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiffs is granted. CRC 9.40.

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

LORD V BELL SPORTS

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE The Application of Cesar Tavares to be allowed to appear in this matter as counsel Pr Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff John Sidney Davenport Lord is granted. The court finds that al conditions to admission as counsel Pro Hac Vice as outlined in Rule 9.40 of the California Rule of Court have been satisfied. 2

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

JOSEPH SORIA VS MILLERCOORS, LLC, ET AL.

COX TO APPEAR AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 11/17/20, 10:57 a.m.; due 11/13/20) Tentative Ruling Defendant Avient Corporation’s (fka PolyOne Corporation) Application of Andrew H. Cox to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. Background On March 4, 2018, Plaintiff Joseph Soria (“Plaintiff” ) sustained injuries when a piece of equipment on a yeast storage system (known as a “sight glass”) exploded.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

PETERSON V. ADT, LLC

Gendreau to appear as counsel pro hac vice Tentative Ruling: To grant the application. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.) Explanation: Defendant has filed an application for Dan J. Gendreau to appear in the above- entitled case, pro hac vice. The Court continued the hearing on this matter to allow Defendant time to file omitted documents, which has been done. The application complies with the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 9.40, and no opposition has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

GERALD HOPMAN, ET AL. VS SUNRISE VILLA CULVER CITY, ET AL.

The court grants the application of Amy Miller to appear pro hac vice for defendants. Unless waived, notice of ruling by moving party.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

MORENO V. SPHERION STAFFING, LLC

Motion: Pro hac vice application Tentative Ruling: To take off calendar, as no moving papers have been filed. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

LEVAUGHN TISDOM VS BLACKHAWK INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION, INC., ET AL.

Neal to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 20, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

TRINHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE CORP VS TRANSFORM KM LLC, ET AL.

Roselius’s applications for admission pro hac vice to represent Defendants Transform KM LLC, Transform SR LLC, and Transform Holdco LLC are GRANTED. Applications to appear pro hac vice are governed by CRC 9.40. The rule requires that the attorney be admitted to practice before a U.S. court or the highest court of any state or territory. A member of the California bar must be associated as attorney of record.

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MABVAX THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS INC VS HONING [E-FILE]

Pro Hac Vice Application Attorney Aaron J. Gold's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Defendants John O'Rourke III and ATC Capital, LLC is GRANTED. (ROA 440.) Counsel is reminded that an attorney whose application to appear as counsel pro hac vice has been granted shall pay to the superior court, on or before the anniversary of the date the application was granted, an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in the case.

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

MABVAX THERAPEUTICS HOLDINGS INC VS HONING [E-FILE]

Pro Hac Vice Application Attorney Aaron J. Gold's unopposed Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Defendants John O'Rourke III and ATC Capital, LLC is GRANTED. (ROA 440.) Counsel is reminded that an attorney whose application to appear as counsel pro hac vice has been granted shall pay to the superior court, on or before the anniversary of the date the application was granted, an annual renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year the attorney maintains pro hac vice status in the case.

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SOMPO JAPAN NIPPONKOA INSURANCE INC. VS PASHA STEVEDORING AND TERMINALS INC.

Cross-Defendant, Clipper Bulk Shipping, Ltd. seeks permission to have James Hohenstein appear pro hac vice in this action. The motion is denied without prejudice. There is no proof of service of the moving papers on the State Bar. Stacey H. Wang states, at ¶¶4 and 5 of her declaration, that she paid the necessary fees and mailed a copy of the application to the State Bar. CRC 9.40(c)(1), however, requires proof of service on the State Bar.

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

LIME CRIME, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION VS NEW LOOK COSMETICS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Kerr to be admitted pro hac vice in this matter. The application contains verification that $50 has been paid to the California Bar. The application is GRANTED. Plaintiff to provide notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

AG&Y ENTERPRISES, INC. VS ROSE GARDEN CONVALESCENT CENTER

KLEIN TO APPEAR AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Responding Party: None (unopposed, as of 11/5/20, 1:28 p.m.; due 11/4/20) Tentative Ruling Defendants Dov E. Jacobs’ and Independence HCM’s Application of Mayer S. Klein to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, contingent upon Defendants’ filing, at or before the date and time of the hearing, proof of payment of $50.00 to the State Bar of California.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

MARKS VS CITY OF SAN DIEGO [E-FILE]

Plaintiff/petitioner sought to have two Chicago lawyers (Ufkes and Richman) appear pro hac vice. ROA 118-127. There was no opposition. On Sept. 27, 2019, the court granted the applications. ROA 136-138. Plaintiff/petitioner then changed counsel. ROA 139-141, 146-149.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

TRINHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE CORP VS TRANSFORM KM LLC, ET AL.

Roselius’s applications for admission pro hac vice to represent Defendants Transform KM LLC, Transform SR LLC, and Transform Holdco LLC are CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, upon showing that the statutory fees have been forwarded to the State Bar along with the applications. Applications to appear pro hac vice are governed by CRC 9.40. The rule requires that the attorney be admitted to practice before a U.S. court or the highest court of any state or territory.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PLAT FORM INC. V. IRVINE BREWERY INC.

Hamburg to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice (Application), filed on 7-28-20 under ROA No. 857, is GRANTED. The Notice of Lodgment (filed on 9-22-20 under ROA No. 1034) reflects compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(c)(1) by showing service of the application and notice of hearing on the State Bar of California. The declaration of Robert W. Hamburg complies with California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(d).

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

FABIAN VILLARREAL VS CANALI TRADING LLC., A NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

Attorney James Drozdowski applies for admission pro hac vice to appear on behalf of Defendants Canali Trading, LLC, Canali Retail, Inc., and Canali U.S.A., Inc. TENTATIVE RULING The hearing on Attorney James Drozdowsi’s applications to appear pro hac vice is CONTINUED to December 17, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. The applications were served upon opposing counsel by electronic service on October 26, 2020, which is only 15 court days prior to the hearing date (taking into account the Veteran’s Day holiday).

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

NEAL L. EIGLER, ET AL. VS STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Norma to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. The Court finds that the Applicant has complied with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. Moving party to submit a proposed order within 5 court days and give notice. 2. The application of R. Martin Weber, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. The Court finds that the Applicant has complied with the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 9.40. Moving party to submit a proposed order within 5 court days and give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

RANDALL VS. MANOR ON THE VINE, LLC

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Moving Party: Attorneys Chad Seigel and Joseph Tacopina Responding Party: None 3. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Moving Party: Defendant Keenon Jackson a/k/a YG Responding Party: Plaintiff Corey Randall 4. Motion to Contest Good Faith Settlement Moving Party: Defendant Keenon Jackson a/k/a YG Responding Party: Defendant Livemore LLC dba Mansion Costa Mesa Ruling Motion 1) Ruling: Defendant YG’s Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is sustained in part and overruled in part.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2020

JONAE KEYES, AN INDIVIDUAL VS TYWON RONELL LAWSON, AN INDIVIDUAL

Lawson - 19STCV33493 Amended Application of Matthew Giacomini, to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant, Tywon Ronell Lawson, is GRANTED. Counsel has complied with the requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. Conference Re: Pro Hac Vice Status of Attorney Matthew Giacomini (Payment of Renewal Fees) is set for 11/16/2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 161     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.