How to Get Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Useful Rulings on Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Recent Rulings on Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE WELLNESS WAY GREEN BAY LLC VS HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT SERVICES LLC

The current matter is ordered continued to August 12, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in this department, to allow plaintiff’s out-of state attorney to submit a written application to appear as counsel pro hac vice and to associate local counsel as attorney of record. An applicant to appear pro hac vice must pay a fee of $50.00 to the State Bar of California. Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40, subd. (e).

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ILAN BITTON VS TYLER THORNTON, ET AL.

SUBJECT: (1) Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Eileen M. Letts Moving Party: Tyler Thornton and Sunfire Nutrition, LLC Resp. Party: None (2) Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Giselle B. May Moving Party: Tyler Thornton and Sunfire Nutrition, LLC Resp. Party: None The motions to be admitted pro hac vice are GRANTED, upon proof of service and payment to the State Bar of California.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

ILAN BITTON VS TYLER THORNTON, ET AL.

SUBJECT: (1) Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Eileen M. Letts Moving Party: Tyler Thornton and Sunfire Nutrition, LLC Resp. Party: None (2) Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Giselle B. May Moving Party: Tyler Thornton and Sunfire Nutrition, LLC Resp. Party: None The motions to be admitted pro hac vice are GRANTED, upon proof of service and payment to the State Bar of California.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

GOLOVKO VS. NORTON

Costs related to the association of a second out-of-state trial counsel to include a $500 fee for counsel to appear pro hac vice and $50 bar fee for pro hac vice counsel; 2. Pre-judgment Interest in the amount of $1696.68 is disallowed as a “cost” related to this case. . A Memorandum of Costs is not an appropriate vehicle for the award of pre-judgment interest. North Oakland Med. Clinic v. Rogers 1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 824, 830.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

DAHL VS. B. BRAUN MEDICAL, INC.

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice 2. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Moving Party: Attorneys for Plaintiff Brett Dahl. Responding Party: None Ruling Motion 1: Attorney Benny Agosto, Jr.’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Moving party fails to show proof of service of the moving papers. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005; CRC 3.1300(c).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

FITNESS VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LLC V. BLAHA

Erik Connolly to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. The Application by Attorney J. Erik Connolly to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40.) The application is verified and/or supported by a declaration. It properly sets forth the applicant’s residence and office address and local counsel’s contact information. It states the applicant’s courts and dates of admission and attests to his good standing. It states that there have been two similar applications from the last two years.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

FERNANDEZ VS RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC

Plaintiff Fernandez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Victor S. Woods Victor S. Woods’ pro hac vice application is granted. No appearance by CourtCall or otherwise is required on July 10.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

FORD VS. CHEVRON

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Atty. Bonan Link) FILED BY J D. FORD, PAMELA THURMAN-FORD * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

FORD VS. CHEVRON

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Atty. Lee Lesher) FILED BY J D. FORD, PAMELA THURMAN-FORD * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

FORD VS. CHEVRON

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Atty. Scott Freiling) FILED BY J D. FORD, PAMELA THURMAN-FORD * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

ART HERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY, ET AL.

DISCUSSION: Application To Appear Pro Hac Vice Attorney: David P. Blanke An application to appear pro hac vice in this Court must include “proof of service by mail in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 1013a of the copy of the application and of the notice of hearing of the application on all parties who have appeared in the cause and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.” (CRC 9.40(c)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

DORA CHACON VS MCM CORPORATION, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION;, ET AL.

The Court is inclined to grant the unopposed application for attorney Kevin Ceglowski to appear pro hac vice in this case.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

HAMMOND ENTERPRISES VS. PURE POWER

HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE FILED BY PURE POWER! INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Application for admission of J. Robert Smith to appear pro hac vice is granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

JOSELITO LOPEZ VS HERAEUS PRECIOUS METALS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, ET AL.

] #2 TENTATIVE RULING Defendants HERAEUS PRECIOUS METALS NOTAH AMERICA LLC and HERAEUS INCORPORATED’s unopposed application for non-resident Joseph Centeno to appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. Moving Party to give Notice. No Opposition(s) filed as of June 30, 2020. Due by June 24, 2020. (CCP §1005(b).) The application for Joseph Centeno to be admitted Pro Hac Vice is granted.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

KATIE O CONNELL MARSH VS GAUMONT TELEVISION USA LLC

The Court GRANTS the pro hac vice application of Chew conditioned on Defendants providing the Court with a proof of service indicating that his pro hac vice application and notice thereof was served on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office. Moving parties are ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

ANTONIO LEON, ET AL. VS JAMES JABER, M.D., ET AL.

On February 13, 2020, Defendant Alta Los Angeles Hospitals, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital filed an application to admit Julia McNelis, Esq., as counsel pro hac vice. On March 18, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the application for admission pro hac vice to March 1, 2020. On April 15, 2020, the Court continued the hearing on the application for admission pro hac vice to July 7, 2020. Trial is set for January 21, 2021.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CYNTHIA GAREY, ET AL. VS ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ET AL.

Ring as counsel pro hac vice. Trial is set for January 29, 2021. PARTY’S REQUEST Andrew Tauber and Daniel L. Ring seek to be admitted before the Court pro hac vice, in order to represent Defendants Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc. LEGAL STANDARD The Court initially notes that opposing papers had be filed and personally served on June 22, 2020, at the latest, to conform with the mandates of California Code of Civil Procedure section 1005.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

LUIS ALFREDO PEREZ VS BRYANNA JELESSA COBURN, ET AL.

The unopposed application for admission of Scott A Kossoudji pro hac vice is granted. Defendants are to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

STEPHANIE BANUELOS VS BUFFALO WILD WINGS, INC., ET AL.

Festin to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant, Blazin Wings, Inc. is GRANTED. Counsel has complied with the requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

TERREFORTE V. CLUTTER

(Although the Complaint caption improperly lists as “co-counsel” an attorney not admitted in California, for whom pro hac vice admission has not been requested or obtained, Mr. Bahadori is the sole counsel of record here.) However, the Court finds that sanctions should be imposed here in the reduced sum of $346 per motion.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

HUSSEIN V. RAZIN

Item No. 4—Filing Fees Nothing in Rule 8.278(d) allows for the recovery of costs to appear pro hac vice. Those are fees charged by the State Bar of California to process the application and monitor the out-of-state and local attorneys. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.) The motion to tax those two $50 application fees is GRANTED. The memorandum of costs also seeks recovery of “court fee for pulling documents for Appeal Appendix.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. VS WENDT & SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Marriot , Esq., admitted pro hac vice as co-counsel in this action. II. Analysis. California Rules of Court, rule 9.40 authorizes this Court to grant a verified petition of an out-of-state attorney to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a California action.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

NEAL L. EIGLER, ET AL. VS STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Applicant Michael Angelovich The Court finds that Applicant Michael Angelovich has complied with California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. The application by Michael Angelovich to be admitted pro hac vice to appear on behalf of Plaintiffs Neal and Jaye Eigler is GRANTED. The Court enters the proposed order filed by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs to give notice. 2. Application to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Applicant Bradley W. BeskinThe Court finds that Applicant Bradley W.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

KAREN DENISE FOSBROOK VS MEDICAL DEPOT INC ET AL

CASE NO: BC682049 [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Dept. 31 1:30 p.m. July 1, 2020 Defendant, HL Corp (USA) seeks an order permitting James Regan to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this action. The application fully satisfies CRC 9.40. The applicant establishes that he is licensed in the State of New York and is in good standing. He has not appeared pro hac vice in any other case in the past two years. He does not regularly work on live in California.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 148     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.