arrow left
arrow right
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 THE BIERNAT LAW GROUP SAN MATEO COUNTY JAMES D. BIERNAT (SBN: 3 VICKYW. CHAN (SBN: 163 3 Bayshore Hwy, suite 133 75839) 226923) er ewne 'o 'y Burlingame, CA 94010 SPPUTY CLERK 4 Tel: (650) 689-5160 Fax: (650) 689-5587 5 Attorney for Defendants SOHYL MAHALLATI,individually and dba ARCH CONSTRUCTION, [erroneously sued herein as SAYL MAHALLATIand ARCH CONSTRUCTION] IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO MONTGOMERY SANSOME, LP, LEONARD Case No.: CIV508839 A. NORDEMAN, 12 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED 13 Plaintiffs, STATEMENT OF THE CASE 14 vs. 15 ARCH CONSTRUCTION, SAYL MAHALLATI,NASSER MAHALLATI,and 16 DOES 1 through 100; 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 DEFENDANT OFFERS THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO THE PROSPECTIVE JURORS: 22 The plaintiffs in this case, Montgomery Sansome LP, a partnership, and Leonard 23 Nordeman, the general partner of Montgomery Sansome, sue defendant Sohyl Mahallati, whose 24 business name is Arch Construction, for making defamatory statements that injured their 25 reputation, causing them financial loss and causing Leonard Nordeman emotional distress. 26 27 28 Case No.: CIV 5088839 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED STA TEMElVTOF THE CASE Dated: December 10, 2012 THE BIERNAT LAW GROUP QJAES D. BIERNAT VICKYW. CHAN SOHYL MAHALLATI,individually and dba ARCH CONSTRUCTION 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: CIV 5088839 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED STA TEMPT OF THE C4$ E