On October 04, 2011 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Montgomery Sansomelp,
Nordeman, Leonard A,
and
Arch Construction Lp,
Mahallati, Nasser,
Mahallati, Sayl,
for (13) Unlimited Defamation
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
~ y p
1 Shawn Ridgell (State Bar No. 201179) @ p g g Q
RIDGELL & LAWLORLLP
2 2128 Broadway
Oakland, Ca 94612
APR 24 2012
3 (510) 986-1300 whHK OF THE SUP EAIOA COUilT
SAN MATEO CQUQTY
4 Attorne s for Plaintiffs LEONARD NORDEMAN &
MONT? rOMERY SANSOME LP ZOlZ
g?y <'?
el?po?stan??II
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
10 (Unlimited Jurisdiction)
11 LEONARD A. NORDEMAN; ACTION NO: CIV 508839
MONTGOMERY SANSOME
12 LP; [~~: —: —= ] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
13 Plaintiffs AMENDED COMPLAINT
D.te:
Time:
X=-:::~
9:OIt a.m.
15 ARCH CONSTRUCTION, Dept.: Law 8r, Motion
SAYL MAHALLATI,
I6 NASSER MAHALLATI,
DOES 1-100,
17
18 Defendants.
19
20 The Motion for leave to amended the complaint came regularly for
2 I hearing on a~~A, . %hewn Ridgell appeared as counsel for the plaintiffs, and
22 James Biernat appeared as counsel for the defendants. The court, having considered
23 the moving and supporting papers, and good cause appearing,
24 IT IS ORDERED that:
25 1. Plaintiffs'otion for leave to amend the complaint is GRANTED. The proposed
26 amended complaint filed in connection with the motion for leave to amend is not
27 deemed filed. Plaintiffs shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file their
28 amended complaint.
1 Dated:
JUN Og PPg
Judge Wthe Superior 5ourt
g RAyMONP SWOPE
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document Filed Date
June 08, 2012
Case Filing Date
October 04, 2011
Category
(13) Unlimited Defamation
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
~ y p 1 Shawn Ridgell (State Bar No. 201179) @ p g g Q RIDGELL & LAWLORLLP 2 2128 Broadway Oakland, Ca 94612 APR 24 2012 3 (510) 986-1300 whHK OF THE SUP EAIOA COUilT SAN MATEO CQUQTY 4 Attorne s for Plaintiffs LEONARD NORDEMAN & MONT? rOMERY SANSOME LP ZOlZ g?y <'? el?po?stan??II 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 10 (Unlimited Jurisdiction) 11 LEONARD A. NORDEMAN; ACTION NO: CIV 508839 MONTGOMERY SANSOME 12 LP; [~~: —: —= ] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 13 Plaintiffs AMENDED COMPLAINT D.te: Time: X=-:::~ 9:OIt a.m. 15 ARCH CONSTRUCTION, Dept.: Law 8r, Motion SAYL MAHALLATI, I6 NASSER MAHALLATI, DOES 1-100, 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 The Motion for leave to amended the complaint came regularly for 2 I hearing on a~~A, . %hewn Ridgell appeared as counsel for the plaintiffs, and 22 James Biernat appeared as counsel for the defendants. The court, having considered 23 the moving and supporting papers, and good cause appearing, 24 IT IS ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiffs'otion for leave to amend the complaint is GRANTED. The proposed 26 amended complaint filed in connection with the motion for leave to amend is not 27 deemed filed. Plaintiffs shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file their 28 amended complaint. 1 Dated: JUN Og PPg Judge Wthe Superior 5ourt g RAyMONP SWOPE 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28