arrow left
arrow right
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
  • MONTGOMERY SANSOME ET AL VS ARCH CONSTR. ET AL(13) Unlimited Defamation document preview
						
                                

Preview

~ y p 1 Shawn Ridgell (State Bar No. 201179) @ p g g Q RIDGELL & LAWLORLLP 2 2128 Broadway Oakland, Ca 94612 APR 24 2012 3 (510) 986-1300 whHK OF THE SUP EAIOA COUilT SAN MATEO CQUQTY 4 Attorne s for Plaintiffs LEONARD NORDEMAN & MONT? rOMERY SANSOME LP ZOlZ g?y <'? el?po?stan??II 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 10 (Unlimited Jurisdiction) 11 LEONARD A. NORDEMAN; ACTION NO: CIV 508839 MONTGOMERY SANSOME 12 LP; [~~: —: —= ] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 13 Plaintiffs AMENDED COMPLAINT D.te: Time: X=-:::~ 9:OIt a.m. 15 ARCH CONSTRUCTION, Dept.: Law 8r, Motion SAYL MAHALLATI, I6 NASSER MAHALLATI, DOES 1-100, 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 The Motion for leave to amended the complaint came regularly for 2 I hearing on a~~A, . %hewn Ridgell appeared as counsel for the plaintiffs, and 22 James Biernat appeared as counsel for the defendants. The court, having considered 23 the moving and supporting papers, and good cause appearing, 24 IT IS ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiffs'otion for leave to amend the complaint is GRANTED. The proposed 26 amended complaint filed in connection with the motion for leave to amend is not 27 deemed filed. Plaintiffs shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file their 28 amended complaint. 1 Dated: JUN Og PPg Judge Wthe Superior 5ourt g RAyMONP SWOPE 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28