On July 20, 2017 a
Exhibit,Appendix
was filed
involving a dispute between
Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company,
Total Petrochemicals & Refining Usa Inc,
and
Kinder Morgan Petcoke Gp Llc,
Kinder Morgan Petcoke Lp,
for Insurance
in the District Court of Harris County.
Preview
EXHIBIT “
8/12/2019 2:33 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 35886043
By: Tiffany Jefferson
Filed: 8/12/2019 2:33 PM
CAUSE NO. 2017-48075
TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
REFINING USA, INC., and
ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
HARRIS COUNTY
Vv.
KINDER MORGAN PETCOKE, LP
AND KINDER MORGAN 164th DISTRICT COURT
PETCOKE GP LLC
Order Granting TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc.’s Cross-
Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability and Ace Property &
Casualty Insurance Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
On the 24th day of June 2019, came to be heard Plaintiff TOTAL Petrochemicals &
Refining USA, Inc.’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability and Ace Property &
Casualty Insurance Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
The Court, having considered the motions, responses and replies, and the arguments of
counsel hereby:
GRANTS TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc.’s (“TOTAL’s”) Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment on Liability and Ace Property & Casualty Insurance Company’s
It is therefore ORDERED Chubb's claims for subrogation
2g?
(“Chubb’s”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment are granted.
It is further ORDERED that Total's and Chubb's claims for breach of contract against Kinder Morgan Petcoke, LP
CEATVFFOR BREACH OF CONTRACT are granted as to liability only.
ing to carry the required minimum insurance policies i
with the té ntract:
Failin: ”s employees additi on the excess
msurance policy Kinder Morgan Petcoke LP did carry;
4831-4193-5263.1/A7284/A26161/080919
Limiting TOTAL’s status as an additional insured on Kinder Mor;
‘etcoke LP’s excess insurance policy to the scope of Kinde Organ
Pei ¢ LP s indemnity;
Failing to pro’ any coverage to TOTAL Tts employees as
additional insureds rimary and n, ontributory basis, including
failing to pay the amount CSS: inder its self-insured retention to
cause its excess insurance apply and cover TOTAL and its
employees on a prim d non-con' tory basis as required by the
Contract;
Failin; give TOTAL notice that the scope of covera fforded to
‘AL had been materially limited compared to earlier Kim Morgan
policies, which would have covered TOTAL and its employees fot
Counts incident.
inder Morgan Petcoke LP’s breach of the Contract caused TOTAL dama;
depriving and its employees of primary and non-contril coverage for
the Underlying Claims ai out of the fatal injury ary Counts;
Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC is Ii s Kinder Morgan Petcoke LP’s General
Partner pursuant to § 153 ) of the Texas Busines anizations Code; and
The issue of amount of damages suffered by TOTAL remains pé before this
wrt.
B’S CLAIM FOR CONTRACTUAL SUBROGATION
As set {0 in Paragraphs 1-4 above, TOTAL is entitled to g ary judgment on
liability for its breac! contract claim against Kind organ;
Pursuant to its excess insurancé icy ed to TOTAL, Chubb is contractually
subrogated to TOTAL’s right recover e breach(es) of Contract set forth
herein.
Kinder Tgan Petcoke LP’s breach of the Contract caused Chi damages by
lepriving TOTAL and its employees of coverage for the Underlying Claims art
4831-4193-5263.1/A7284/A26161/080919
oul atal injury of Gary Counts that should have been primary t On-
contributory with, Chubb’s covéi ose clai.
8. The issue of the amount ges suffered by Chubb rem ng before this
Dated this day of August 2019.
Signed:
8/17/2019
Mba, Dmg
Judge Presiding
4831-4193-5263.1/A7284/A26161/080919
Document Filed Date
September 24, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 20, 2017
Status
Case On Appeal - Civil
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.