Proof of Service: Edward Funez vs. Fire Insurance Exchange

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA            o COUNTY OF FRESNO                      F        R   SE   NLY
                                               Civil
                                               I 130
                                                     Division
                                                     O Street                                                                -E
                                      Fresno, California 93721—2220
                                                                                                                 FEB    2'2  2021
                                        EDWARD FUNEZ
          PLAINTIFF / PETITIONER:


          DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:         FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE,    ET.AL.
                                                                                                         BF§ESN0 CW ,




                                                                                                                          SUPERIOR  COURT

                                                                                                                                 DEPT  403
                                                                                                       CASE NUMBER:
                ORDER 0N       REQUEST FOR      PRETRIAL    DISCOVERY CONFERENCE                                     ncaceozyss

                                                                        ORDER
          The Request for    Pretrial Discovery Conference        is:


           D    Denied.
                Reason(s)   for The Denial:

           D    Insufficient   meet 0nd confer      effofls prior  ’rofiling ’rhe Request    for Pre’rriclDiscovery Conference.
           D    Failure To  make    request on the Mandatory local form.
           D    Failure 10  provide o sufficient summary of       ’rhe dispute.

           E]   Failure 10  provide a proper privilege log.
           D    Failure 10 serve The    opposing    party with a copy of the Requesf        for Pretrial Discovery Conference.
           E    Other:                 three requests.
                         Plaintiff filed                  Ploinfiff may   file a motion Gs    To all1hree; sanctions    willbe awarded
                against the unsuccessful      party.


           @     The Court   finds That The current dispute will n01 benefit       from o   Pretrial Discovery Conference.
                 E   Plaintims)  D    Defendanfls)      D   Cross-comploinonus)        D    Cross—defendonns)      D   omens)     moyfile a
                     discovery motion     limited 10 The dispute set out in the Request for Prefriol        Discovery Conference.
           D    Granted.


         The  Pretrial Discovery Conference        isset for                  ct         am.      in Department
           D     Parties ore   ordered 10 bring    0|] discovery requests    and responses and evidence           of allmee’r  and confer
                 cfiempfs.

           D     Other:




                                                                                                             M
         The  fime for filing o  motion to compel discovery on The disputed             issues is Tolled between The date of The filing       of
         The request    0nd The date    of The Court's order thereon.       CCP§201 6.080(c)(2).      The Court calculates this fo be
         14       days.  CCP §§1013 and        10130   (4)apply.

         Refusal of   any counsel    to participdfe   in o Pretrial Discovery Conference shall        be grounds, in The discretion
         of The Court, for em‘ry of   on order adverse 10 The party represented by counsel so refusing, or adverse ’ro counsel.

          At The conclusion of The Préfricl Discovery Conference, ponies will be asked To stipulate Tho’r the Court may issue
          on order odjudicofing The merits of The discovery dispute             which Is The subject of The Requesf for Pretrial Discovery
          Conference. See attached         stipulation.




          Date:   2/22/2021                                                                            /
                                                                                               [Judge ofihe   Superi r  ouri




         TCV-72 R0240               ORDER ON REQUEST FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE                                           Local RU'e 2-1-17
                   SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO                                  FOR COURTUSE ONL Y
                                   Civil Department, Central Division
                                              1 130
                                                    "O" Street
                                    Fresno, California    93724-0002
                                             (559) 457-2000

          TITLE 0F CASE:
            Edward Funez vs.     Fire Insurance  Exchange


                              CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING                                        C§3%E%“é%§§i55

          I certify that|am  not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the:
                                                     Order on Request for PTDC, dated 2/22/21
          was placed   in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place         shown below
          following our ordinary business practice.      lam  readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing
          correspondence for mailing.      On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and         mailing, it is deposited

          in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid.




          Place of mailing:
          On  Date:
                              Fresno,California
                      02/22/2021
                                                    93724-0002     ,




                                                              Clerk,  by    W          “ "
                                                                                           I




                                                                                              Eéla Alvarado
                                                                                                                                    . Deputy




          John Edward    Kerley                                                 Alexi P Antoniou
          Kerley Schaffer LLP                                                   Wood,   Smith,  Henning & Berman      LLP
          1939 Harrison St.,   Suite 500                                        7108  N. Fresno St., Suite 250
          Oakland,   CA 94612                                                   Fresno,  CA 93720




          Michelle  R Ferber                                                    John  R. Brydon
          Ferber Law,   P.C.                                                    DemJer Armstrong &     Rowland,    LLP
          2603 Camino Ramon,       Suite 385                                    101  Montgomery Street,     Suite 1800
          San  Ramon,    CA 94583                                               San  Francisco, CA 941 04




          Daniel Kohls/Leighton Koberlein
          Hansen   Kohls Sommer & Jacob
           1520 Eureka    Rd., Suite 100
          Roseville,  CA 95661




         D   Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional   Address Page Attached
         TGN-06b R08-06                                CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING