arrow left
arrow right
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
  • INGEUN SONG  vs.  QUDIAN, INC., et al(28) Complex Unlimited Securities Litigation document preview
						
                                

Preview

DEPUTY OLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO COIVIPLEX CIVIL LITIGATION INGEUN SONG, individually and on Case No. 18 CIV 01425 behalf of all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, Assigned for All Purposes to Department 21, Hon. Robert D. Foiles vs. ORDER REASSIGNING COMPLEX QUDIAN INC, et al., CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES and SETTING OF CASE Defendants. MANAGEMENT AND TRIAL / SETTING CONFERENCE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as follows: Effective immediately, pursuant to San Mateo County Superior Court Local Rule 3.200, the above-entitled matter is REASSIGNED for all purposes to the Honorable Robert D. Foiles in Department 21, located at Courtroom 2L 400 County Center, Redwood City, California. The Status Conference set for May 17, 2021 is VACATED. This complex action is set for Complex Status Conference in Department 21 on Friday, May l4, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Appearances shall be remote only, using Zoom. Assigned Department Information: To schedule a Law and Motion Hearing, please see Local Rule 3.402 or visit the assigned Judicial Ofcer’s webpage at www.sanmateocourt.orgiciviljudges. Contact information for your assigned department is as follows: Department 21 Phone: (650) 26 1 -5 121 Department E—Mail: dept21@sanmateocourt.org Complex Case E-Mail: complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. Electronic Service. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1010.6(0), and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.253(c) and Rule 2.251(0), all parties and their counsel shall serve all documents electronically, and accept service of documents electronically from all other parties, in conformity with Code of Civil Procedure Section 1010.6 and the California Rules of Court, except when personal service is required by statute. Counsel for the parties shall meet and confer, agree upon, and keep updated, an e—service list for this complex civil action. The parties are reminded that electronic service of documents may extend time periods for response by two (2) court days, I pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1010.6(a)(4)(B). 2. Mandatory E-Filing. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1010.6(0), all parties shall le all documents electronically in this complex civil action, except those documents identied in Local Rule 2.1.8. Presently, the following documents must still be led/lodged in hardcopy paper: Ex Parte Motions and Oppositions thereto Stipulation and Proposed Order Proposed Judgments Abstract of Judgment Appeal Documents, including Notice of Appeal Administrative Records The document (other than exhibits) must be text searchable. Please visit www.sanmateocourt.org for further information on e-ling. Please note that exhibits to an); electronically led briefs, declarations or other documents must be electronically “bookmarked” as required by CRC Rule 3.1 1 10(t)(4). l 3. Courtesy Copies for Assigned Department. In the future, a courtesy copy of all pleadings, motions, applications, briefs, and any and all other papers led in this complex case shall be electronically served upon the assigned Civil Judge and Department by email only at email address complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org AND dept21@sanmateocourt.org. Please add complexcivil@,sanmateocourt.org AND dept21@sanmateocourt.org to your e-service list in this complex case as to any and all papers led with the Court. A11 motions and briefs shall conform with the California Rules of Court, especially Rule 3.1 l l3, and indicate on the caption page that this matter is assigned for all purposes to Department 21. 4. Electronic Correspondence to Assigned Department. Correspondence to the Department of the assigned Civil Judge, such as requests to take matters o‘ calendar and requests for rescheduling, regarding complex civil actions shall be submitted electronically, rather than paper, by e-mail addressed to complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org AND dept21@,sanmateocourt.org. All e- correspondence must be sent in at least 12 point type. This email address is for the Department of the assigned Civil Judge to receive correspondence regarding complex civil cases, and is not a venue for back-and-forth communications with the judge. Communications to this email address are not part of the ocial court les — just like a paper letter, they are not “led” documents — and will be retained for at least 30 days and then be subject to deletion (destruction) thereafter. 5. Mandatory Email Header. All communications to the complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org email address MUST include in the header “subject line” the Case Number and Name of Case (e.g., CIV 654321 Smith v. Jones) and the name of the assigned judge (e.g., Judge Foiles). 6. Ex Parte Motions. Presently, due to the Covid l9 Pandemic, no in- — until further order of the court — and person ex parte appearances are permitted any ex parte appearances must be pre-schedule with the Department of the assigned Civil Judge and pre-organized by the moving party remote appearance by all involved parties and for the Court. Ex parte applications in this matter shall heard by Department 21 , on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 1:30 p.m., and the parties must meet the requirements of CRC Rule 3. 120 et seq.. With the consent of counsel for all parties, telephone conferences on simple interim case management matters may be scheduled with the Court for a mutually convenient time and date — with the scheduling and logistics of such telephone conferences to be the responsibility of the requesting party/parties. 7. E-Service of Discovery. All discovery methods (C.C.P. § 2019.010), including but not limited to notice of deposition, special interrogatories, form interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions, shall be served electronically upon counsel for the parties. All discovery responses by a party in response to a discovery method by another party shall be served electronically upon counsel for the parties. Production of documents shall be provided in electronic form, unless the parties agree otherwise in writing. If not previously established, counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding possible establishment of a joint electronic document depository for the uploading and downloading of electronic document productions. 8. Informal Discovery Conferences. a. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 2016.080, and the authority of a complex civil judge under CRC Rule 3 .750, no party may move to compel discovery, or le any other discovery motion, until the parties have had an Informal Discovery Conference. Counsel must have exhausted all meet and confer obligations before the Informal Discovery Conference. b. Any party requesting an Informal Discovery Conference shall comply with Local Rule 3.700, and schedule the IDC with the Civil Commissioner. 9. Limit to 35. Given the nature of this complex civil action, the Court views document production and depositions as the most effective means of discovery for adjudication. Accordingly, no party may propound more than 35 special interrogatories total and no party may propound more than 35 requests for admissions (other than as to the authenticity of documents) total, without prior court order after demonstration of need and a showing that other means of discovery would be less efcient. 10. No Appendix of Non-California Authorities. Pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1 l 13(i), the Complex Civil Department, Dept. 2, does not require any appendix of non- California authorities, unless specically stated by the Court as to a particular motion. 11. Status Conference. In anticipation of the Case Management and Trial Setting Conference, counsel for the parties should be prepared to discuss at the hearing and le and serve written Status Conference statements (in prose and details, not using the standardized Judicial Council form) with a courtesy copy emailed to complexcivil(@sanmateocourt.org AND dept21@sanmateocourt.org at least ve court days prior to the Conference, as to the following: a. Status of Settlement or Mediation; b. Status of the related New York class action; c. Whether the stay of this case should remain or be lifted; d. hAny anticipated motions and proposed brieng schedule; and e. Any other matters for which the parties seek Court ruling or scheduling. W DATED: February 4, 2021 i 7:» E 3"? F7 HON. LELAND DAVIS 111 PRESIDING JUDGE of the SUPERIOR COURT SERVICE LIST Song v. Qudian, 1 8CIVO 1426 as of January 2021 Attorneys for Plaintiffs: LAURENCE ROSEN THE ROSEN LAW FLRM PA 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York City, NY 100 1 6 (212) 686—1060 lrosen@rosen1ega1.com HNG CHEN THE ROSEN LAW FIRM PA 101 Greenwood Avenue, Suite 440 Jenkintown, PA 19046 (215) 600-2817 jchen@rosenlegal.com Attorneys for Defendants: JAMES KREISSMAN Specially Appearing Defendant Qudian Inc.: STEPHEN BLAKE BO BRIAN JIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 (650) 251-5000 jkreissman@stblaw.com sblake@stblaw.com ban.jin@stblaw.com MATTHEW CLOSE Specially Appearing Defendants Credit O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Suisse, Citigroup, Nomura Securities, 400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor Stifel Nicolaus & C0,, and Needham & Co. Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 430-6000 mclose omm.com