arrow left
arrow right
  • BOOTUP VENTURES, LLC, et al  vs.  TARUN GAUR, et al(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BOOTUP VENTURES, LLC, et al  vs.  TARUN GAUR, et al(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BOOTUP VENTURES, LLC, et al  vs.  TARUN GAUR, et al(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • BOOTUP VENTURES, LLC, et al  vs.  TARUN GAUR, et al(06) Unlimited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
						
                                

Preview

CIV-1 10 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NO FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: David P.Nemecek, Jr. (State Bar No. 194402) FIRM NAMEThe Fortress Law Firm, |nc. Bahama"? STREET ADDRESS50 California Street. Suite 1500 CITY:San Francisco STATE: CA ZIP CODE 94111 WSupenarCmI-mfcalifarnia,cbmty ufSan Maren- TELEPHONE No:(415) 277-5400 FAX No: (415) 723-7370 0N 1/12/2021 E-MAIL ADDRESS: david@fortress-Iaw.com BootUp Ventures. Boostcare, M. ten Vaanhoit & M. Agarwal ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF By 1!! l Dlii' HI San Mateo 400 County Center Drive STREET ADDRESS. ADDRESS MAILING Redwood City 94063 CITY AND ZIP CODE BRANCH NAMEHall of Justice & Records BootUp Ventures, LLC Plaintiff/Petitioner: Defendant/Respondent: Tarun Gaur. et al. CASE NUMBER: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 1BCIV06232 A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return is provided with the document. This form may not be used for dismissal of a derivative action or a class action or of any party or cause of action in a class action. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.) 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) E Vith prejudice (2) E Without prejudice b. (1) E Complaint (2) E Petition (3) E Cross-complaintled by (name): on (date): (4) E Cross-complaint led by (name): on (date): (5) D Entireaction ofallparties and all causes of action (6) E Other (specify):'1st. 3rd, 4th,5th. 10th, 11th, 12th & 13th claims alleged against Tarun Gaur ONLY 2. (Complete in all casesexcept family law cases.) The court E did E did not waive court fees and costs for a party in this case. (This information may be obtained from clerk. If court fees and costs were waived, the declaration on the back of this form must be completed). the >354; (W’QJX‘ ' Date:January 12, 2021 David P. Nemecek, Jr. x (TYPE 0R PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) ‘lf dismissal requested is of specied causes parties only ot specied of action only, (SIGNATUW f0 . Attorney Ol' party Without attorney action. or cross-complaints to be dismissed. E or of specified cross-complaints only. so state and identify the parties. causes of plaintiff/petitioner E Defendant/Respondent E Cross Complainant 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given." Date: p E (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEV E PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) “ lf a cross-complaint - or Response (Family Law) seeking affirmative (SicNATURE) Attorney or party Without attorney for: relief - is on tile, the attorney for cross-complainant (respondent) must sign E Plaintiff/Petitioner this consent if required by Code of Civil Procedure section 581 (i) or (j). D Defendant/Respondent E Cross Complainant (To be completed by clerk) 4. E Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 5 EX Dismissal entered on (date): 1/12/2021 as to only (name): AS STATED ABOVE 6. E Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 7. a. E Attorney or party without attorney notied on (date): b. E Attorney orpartywithout attorneynot notied. Filing party failed to provide E a copy to be conformed E means to return conformed copy /s/ Anthony Berini Date: 1/12/2021 Neal I. Taniguchi Clerk. by ,Deputy m. 1of 2 ' F rm Ado ted tor Mandate Use Code of Civil Procedure. § 551 et seq; Gov. Code. Jgdicial Cguncil of Calitomiray REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL § 68637(c); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1390 ClV-1 10 [Rev Jan. 1. 201 3] www.murls.ca.gov CIV-110 CASE NUMBER: Plaintiff/Petitioner: BootUp Ventures, LLC 18CIV06232 Defendant/Respondent: Tarun Gaur, et al. COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND COSTS If a party whose court fees and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other means, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. The court may refuse to dismiss the case until the lien is satisfied. (Gov. Code, § 68637.) Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees 1. The court waived court fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. The person named in item 1 is (check one below): a. not recovering anything of value by this action. b. recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (If item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3. All court fees and court costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): Yes No I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) CIV-110 [Rev. January 1, 2013] REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Page 2 of 2