On March 25, 2019 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Albiso, Juanita,
and
Stuck, Gregory James,
Stuck, Matthew,
for 22: Unlimited Auto
in the District Court of Yolo County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF YOLO
CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER
HON HONORABLE SAMUEL T MCADAM
CASE NO CV 2019 630 / CV 2020 764(fyr)
TITLE ALBISO VS STUCK
PROCEEDINGS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
CLERK Kristina Joslin
APPEARANCES
1O0Plaintiff Present
20)WiBy Attys
Os/t
S
7
NEXTSCHEDULEDAPPEARAKGE (IO clays)
DATE 09/23/2020
TIME 900 AM
REPORTER
190 Tentative ruling adopted see attached
WARRANT ORDERS
1 1 Debtor failed to appear Warrant of Body
Attachment ordered Bail set $,
2 0 Stay issuance of warrant until next hearing
creditor to send warning letter to debtor
3 0 Warrant of body attachment recalled
DISMISSALS
IG BO 1 0 Case ordered dismissed
Dept_]O with Owithout prejudice
Time_4_00 2 O Case ordered dismissed for lack of
Dept__ 10 prosecution (DLP)
3 Jury OCourt Tnal OTime Est 3 0 Party dismissed (PDS)
Date. Time, Dept,
4 OSettlement Conference
Date. Time. Dept, RULINGS
5 OTnal Readiness Conference 1 Court ordered temporary orders remain in
Date______—Time. Dept, effect pending further hearing
4 C1 Continued by Court s Motion (CTC)
5 1 Continuance requested by party(s) (CPM)
By
2 C1 Court granted restraining order effective
until Defendant ordered to stay
yards away from plaintiff
6 O Notice waived
MOTION/ORDERS
1 O Cause ordered off calendar
Orequest of Dino pis filed
30 Default ordered
4 Proceed by offer of proof
§ O Stipulation reached
6 C Submitted on the pleadings
Owith argument Owithout argument
7 D Taken under submission (USD)
8 lotion/Petn/App
granted (MOTG) Eidenied (MOTD)
100 Claim of exempt DENIED $$ released to
creditor
110] Claim of exempt GRANTED $$ released to
debtor
120 Debtor sworn and released
160 Settlement conference held case settled
(SCL)
eee no settlement reached
18U/Tentative ruling posted (TD)
OtherTENTATIVE RULINGS for LAW and MOTION
September 23, 2020
TENTATIVE RULING
Case Albiso v Stuck
Case No CV PM 19 630
Hearmg Date September 23, 2020 Department Ten 9 00am
Defendant Matthew James Stuck s motion to consolidate cases is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE (Code of Civ Proc § 1048 subd (a)) Defendant failed to file the motion s
supporting papers 16 court days before the hearmg (Code Civ Proce § 1005 subd (b))
Further defendant did not file the motion to consolidate in each case sought to be consolidated
(Cal Rules of Court rule 3 350(a)(1)(C) )
If no hearing 1s requested this tentative ruling 1s effective immediately No formal order
pursuant to California Rule of Court 3 1312 or further notice 1s required
14608 ) Plaintiff's complaint alleges that defendant knew or should have known that defendant
Danielle Lake was unlicensed to drive the vehicle (Complaint p 7 94)
The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court s tentative ruling system as required
by Local Rule 11 4(b) Counsel for moving party or the moving party :f unrepresented by
counsel 1s ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling
system
If no hearing 1s requested and no party appears at the hearing this tentative ruling 1s effective
immediately No formal order pursuant to Califormia Rule of Court 3 1312 or further notice 1s
required
lof1
Document Filed Date
September 23, 2020
Case Filing Date
March 25, 2019
Category
22: Unlimited Auto
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER HON HONORABLE SAMUEL T MCADAM CASE NO CV 2019 630 / CV 2020 764(fyr) TITLE ALBISO VS STUCK PROCEEDINGS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CLERK Kristina Joslin APPEARANCES 1O0Plaintiff Present 20)WiBy Attys Os/t S 7 NEXTSCHEDULEDAPPEARAKGE (IO clays) DATE 09/23/2020 TIME 900 AM REPORTER 190 Tentative ruling adopted see attached WARRANT ORDERS 1 1 Debtor failed to appear Warrant of Body Attachment ordered Bail set $, 2 0 Stay issuance of warrant until next hearing creditor to send warning letter to debtor 3 0 Warrant of body attachment recalled DISMISSALS IG BO 1 0 Case ordered dismissed Dept_]O with Owithout prejudice Time_4_00 2 O Case ordered dismissed for lack of Dept__ 10 prosecution (DLP) 3 Jury OCourt Tnal OTime Est 3 0 Party dismissed (PDS) Date. Time, Dept, 4 OSettlement Conference Date. Time. Dept, RULINGS 5 OTnal Readiness Conference 1 Court ordered temporary orders remain in Date______—Time. Dept, effect pending further hearing 4 C1 Continued by Court s Motion (CTC) 5 1 Continuance requested by party(s) (CPM) By 2 C1 Court granted restraining order effective until Defendant ordered to stay yards away from plaintiff 6 O Notice waived MOTION/ORDERS 1 O Cause ordered off calendar Orequest of Dino pis filed 30 Default ordered 4 Proceed by offer of proof § O Stipulation reached 6 C Submitted on the pleadings Owith argument Owithout argument 7 D Taken under submission (USD) 8 lotion/Petn/App granted (MOTG) Eidenied (MOTD) 100 Claim of exempt DENIED $$ released to creditor 110] Claim of exempt GRANTED $$ released to debtor 120 Debtor sworn and released 160 Settlement conference held case settled (SCL) eee no settlement reached 18U/Tentative ruling posted (TD) OtherTENTATIVE RULINGS for LAW and MOTION September 23, 2020 TENTATIVE RULING Case Albiso v Stuck Case No CV PM 19 630 Hearmg Date September 23, 2020 Department Ten 9 00am Defendant Matthew James Stuck s motion to consolidate cases is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Code of Civ Proc § 1048 subd (a)) Defendant failed to file the motion s supporting papers 16 court days before the hearmg (Code Civ Proce § 1005 subd (b)) Further defendant did not file the motion to consolidate in each case sought to be consolidated (Cal Rules of Court rule 3 350(a)(1)(C) ) If no hearing 1s requested this tentative ruling 1s effective immediately No formal order pursuant to California Rule of Court 3 1312 or further notice 1s required 14608 ) Plaintiff's complaint alleges that defendant knew or should have known that defendant Danielle Lake was unlicensed to drive the vehicle (Complaint p 7 94) The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11 4(b) Counsel for moving party or the moving party :f unrepresented by counsel 1s ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system If no hearing 1s requested and no party appears at the hearing this tentative ruling 1s effective immediately No formal order pursuant to Califormia Rule of Court 3 1312 or further notice 1s required lof1