arrow left
arrow right
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • BARBARA BARTOSHUK, ET AL VS CARLEEN WHITTESLEY, ET(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 BARBARABARTOSHUK 979 Arlington Rd. FII. @D SA~ MATEO t 2 Redwood City, CA, 94062 OUST 650-670-7935 SEP y g go)5 3 bbartoshuk@gmail.corn ~Coun BARBARABARTOSHUK, IN PRO PER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 8 Barbara Bartoshuk ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 10 vs. ) Case No.: CIV 531589 Carleen Carleen Whittesley, Whittelsey, an individual; Trustee of the Stuart G. ) [F~~~j ORDER ON DEMURRER ) BY CARLEKN WHITTELSEY Whittelsey Jr. Family Trust; TO BARTOSHUK FIRST AMENDED Bruce Roberts, an individual; ) ) COMPLAINT 13 Bruce Roberts, Agent, Hopkins 4 Carley A Law ) Corporation; Date: August 27, 2015 14 Hopkins & Carley A Law Corporation; and Time: 9:00am Does 1 through 20 inclusive Place: Dept. 18 15 ) ) 16 ) Judge: The Honorable Susan Irene Etezadi Defendant(~). ) 17 ) ) ) ) 19 20 21 The Demurrer by Carleen Whittelsey to PlaintiffBartoshuk's First Amended Complaint 22 came before the Court for hearing on August 27, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable Susan 23 Irene Etezadi. PlaintiffBarbara Bartoshuk appeared in propna persona. Defendant Carleen 24 Whittelsey appeared through her counsel, Craig Hansen. After considering the parties moving and 25 opposition papers, the oral argument of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court orders as 26 follows: 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order on Demurrer by Defendant Whittelsey to Bartoshuk First Amended Complaint 1 The Demurrers as to the First Cause of Action (Concealment and Misrepresentation), the 2 Second Cause of Action (Intentional Interference with Expected Inheritance) and the Third Cause of 3 Action (Undue Influence) are OVERRULED. 5 Defendant's answer shall be filed and served within 20 days after service of Notice of Entry 6 of Order. 8 Defendant's request to stay this action pending the appeal of the Probate matter is DENIED 9 without prejudice to Defendant to bring a noticed motion supported by argument and authority. 10 12 Dated: September /5, 2015 13 14 15 HON. SUSAN IRENE ETEZADI Judge of the Superior Court 16 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 18 19 20 Cr g Hansen 21 ounsel for Defendant CARLEEN WHITTELSEY 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order on Demurrer by Defendant Whittelsey to Bartoshuk First Amended Complaint 1 PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Bartoshuk v. Whittelsey, et al. Court: San Mateo County Superior Court Case No.: CIV 531589 I am a citizen of the United States. My business address is 979 Arlington Rd., Redwood City, CA 94062. I am over the age of 18 years. On the date set forth below, following ordinary 6 business practice, I served the following document(s): 7 8 [Q~ . 8] ORDER OF DEMURRER BY CARLEKN WHITTELSEY TO BARTOSHUK FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINTAND MEMORANDUMTO COURT RK APPROVAL 9 by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through the electronic mail system to the email 10 address(es) listed below upon prior stipulation of the parties as personal service, according to 11 12 California Rules of Court, Rule 2.251 for electronic service. 13 Mr. Bruce MacLeod Mr. Craig Hansen 14 Willoughby, Stuart, Bening 4 Cook Law Offices of Craig Hansen 15 50 West San Fernando, Ste. 400 560 S. Winchester Blvd., Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95113 San Jose, CA 95128 16 (408) 289-1972 (408) 571-6300 Email: brucewsbclawvers.corn Email: craig@craighansenlaw.corn 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants Bruce Roberts Attorneys for Carleen Whittelsey, 19 and Hopkins Ec Carley Individually and as Trustee of the Stuart G. Whittelsey Jr.Family Trust 20 21 I declare under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the State of California that the 22 foregoing is true and correct. 23 24 Dated: September 4, 2015 25 26 Barbara Bartoshuk, in Pro Per 27 28 Prnnf nf %rranrw hv Plrrtrnnir Meal