On September 30, 2016 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Toerpe, Lanae,
Toerpe, Matthew,
and
Does 1 Through 100,
Rudolph And Sletten, Inc.,
Shollenbarger - Borello, Inc.,
for (23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
('11
'Wifllianl A. Bogdan (SBN
;...'.
124321)
LYNCH, GILARDI-& GRUMMER
A Professional Corporation 4%
170 Columbus Avenue, 5‘“ .Floor
$6,)
San Francisco, CA. 9413.3
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(.415)- 397-2800
(415). 397-0937
0‘64»
gag}
d44, i
$1.
«9 a,»
14,
g,»
I
’1’
'
Email: wbogdan@lgglaw.com -
Wazfé‘g 20id)
Q -._ —
Attorneys for Defendant
.
)é‘oohéb
000’o
4”}
’ (
RUDOLPH AND 'SLETTEN, INC. 00,9} I}
IN THE SUPERIORCOURT OF THE STATE. OF CALIFORNIA
j
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN‘XMATEO
r—o
'
.
MATTHEW TOER’PE'and LANAE
UNLIMHEDIJURISDICTION
Case N/o’;
_."
16CIV01654
:-
a,
Ea,
gE
"‘3 8 5
E
=
_—_
.
TQERPE, ,f . _
[PRorOSEDMUDGMENT 0N DECISION OF
Plaintiffs, Coyk'r’
I
vs. Qétse Filed: September 30,2016
., g
\ICAUI-DL,U_)'IQ
g . p p .. g . .H _
fil‘rial Date: March,1.9, 2018
RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN, INC.
HH~*.—.‘H"—?‘H
and ,4"
DOES .1.to 100,1nclusivc, /
Defendants. If" BY FAX
.z‘
/
00
p—s
On January 17, 2018, this Cour ,following due notice and hearing and full Consideration. of
1.9 theparties’ written and oral. argum/efnts, grantedsummary judgment and entered and endorsed the
Order Ruling on Objections to Evidence and Granting Defendant Rudolph and Sletten, Inc.’-s
Motion for Summary J udgmefit. Now,‘ therefOre, _
IT IS HEREBY (/),R/DERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
l. Judgment/is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs MATTHEW
I
TOERPE and LANAE TOERPE. Plaintiffs shall take nothing from Defendant, and all claims and
causes of action bzPlaintiffs against'Defendant are dismissed with prejudice.
Lynch. Gilanli
&; gimmmcr
D endant shall recover its costs of suit as provided in section
.
26
'A l’rtnlbsslunul 2. 1032 of the Code of
(Imitation
I70 Chgmthus Ave.
5 Floor
27
San l-‘mnu'sw, CA
Civil Procedure;
9-1 l3}
I'll (415) 397-2800 I
Fax (415) 397-0937 lI
28 I
v
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON DECISION OF COURT
_....,__.______..__
..
.
._
_.~_
..
DATED _ _
233.18
.3-..
._...
36551316301? TEE-[SUPERIOR COURT _.
AP?R€WED A$TO FQRM'
wxmwmu‘bmwn
LN»? (31:31: I;
swruumr 26. 2
‘
Hh' Kimmy;Ma,-
fianhmqumtg‘c
27
muxsnmsm
mmmm 993; ‘
' 2.
ffiiiomsmna IHDGMBESEIT‘EON 1930131013 @132mum
Document Filed Date
April 23, 2018
Case Filing Date
September 30, 2016
Category
(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
('11 'Wifllianl A. Bogdan (SBN ;...'. 124321) LYNCH, GILARDI-& GRUMMER A Professional Corporation 4% 170 Columbus Avenue, 5‘“ .Floor $6,) San Francisco, CA. 9413.3 Telephone: Facsimile: (.415)- 397-2800 (415). 397-0937 0‘64» gag} d44, i $1. «9 a,» 14, g,» I ’1’ ' Email: wbogdan@lgglaw.com - Wazfé‘g 20id) Q -._ — Attorneys for Defendant . )é‘oohéb 000’o 4”} ’ ( RUDOLPH AND 'SLETTEN, INC. 00,9} I} IN THE SUPERIORCOURT OF THE STATE. OF CALIFORNIA j lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN‘XMATEO r—o ' . MATTHEW TOER’PE'and LANAE UNLIMHEDIJURISDICTION Case N/o’; _." 16CIV01654 :- a, Ea, gE "‘3 8 5 E = _—_ . TQERPE, ,f . _ [PRorOSEDMUDGMENT 0N DECISION OF Plaintiffs, Coyk'r’ I vs. Qétse Filed: September 30,2016 ., g \ICAUI-DL,U_)'IQ g . p p .. g . .H _ fil‘rial Date: March,1.9, 2018 RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN, INC. HH~*.—.‘H"—?‘H and ,4" DOES .1.to 100,1nclusivc, / Defendants. If" BY FAX .z‘ / 00 p—s On January 17, 2018, this Cour ,following due notice and hearing and full Consideration. of 1.9 theparties’ written and oral. argum/efnts, grantedsummary judgment and entered and endorsed the Order Ruling on Objections to Evidence and Granting Defendant Rudolph and Sletten, Inc.’-s Motion for Summary J udgmefit. Now,‘ therefOre, _ IT IS HEREBY (/),R/DERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: l. Judgment/is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs MATTHEW I TOERPE and LANAE TOERPE. Plaintiffs shall take nothing from Defendant, and all claims and causes of action bzPlaintiffs against'Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Lynch. Gilanli &; gimmmcr D endant shall recover its costs of suit as provided in section . 26 'A l’rtnlbsslunul 2. 1032 of the Code of (Imitation I70 Chgmthus Ave. 5 Floor 27 San l-‘mnu'sw, CA Civil Procedure; 9-1 l3} I'll (415) 397-2800 I Fax (415) 397-0937 lI 28 I v 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON DECISION OF COURT _....,__.______..__ .. . ._ _.~_ .. DATED _ _ 233.18 .3-.. ._... 36551316301? TEE-[SUPERIOR COURT _. AP?R€WED A$TO FQRM' wxmwmu‘bmwn LN»? (31:31: I; swruumr 26. 2 ‘ Hh' Kimmy;Ma,- fianhmqumtg‘c 27 muxsnmsm mmmm 993; ‘ ' 2. ffiiiomsmna IHDGMBESEIT‘EON 1930131013 @132mum