arrow left
arrow right
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK  vs.  ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000 document preview
						
                                

Preview

ae a a JANET L. BROWN (State Bar No. 208602) IL ED JESSICA M. GARCIA 314298 SAN MATEO COUNTY ZWICKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C, 1320 WILLOW PASS ROAD, SUITE 730 JUN a7 2019 CONCORD, CA 94520 Telephone: (925)689-7070 Facsimile: (925)689-7077 ‘ ORD { Order 1907 | NNO I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO REDWOOD CITY JUDICIAL DISTRICT — LIMITED CIVIL CASE 10} 11 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL (05544 BANK, 12) D ORDER PURSUANT TO Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY 13 JUDGMENT OR IN THE i| ok VS. ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. ags& 14 ROSANNA PITTELLA, et al., omU g38e 15) Defendant(s). Date: December 18, 2018 Time: 9:00 a.m. 23 Ba 16) Dept: LM aE aOoag 17 BU ee 18) Ng The motion of plaintiff AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK for summary 19) judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication came on regularly for hearing on December 20) 18, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. inDepartment/Division LM, the Honorable _ < San) Gc. 21 Judge, presiding. 22 MOTION FOR SUMMARY OF JUDGMENT OR IN THE 23 ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 24 A. Summary Judgment 25) The motion for summary judgment is denied. 26 Summary judgment can be granted only if the undisputed fac show that the entire 27 complaint has no merit. (Code of Civ. Proc. Sect. 437c, sub: (a):) The present motion addresses 28 PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT == o a oY ye ® os os BP saOP Sar ake only the claims for open book account and account stated. It fails to address (and therefcre dispose of) the cause of action for goods sold and delivered. (See Complaint para. CC-1(b)(3).) Since the motion fails to dispose of all three claims, summary judgment cannot be granted. B. Summary Adjudication The motion for summary adjudication as to the causes of action for open book account and account stated is granted as to both claims. The undisputed facts demonstrate Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a written credit card account agreement. (Decl. of Touhidi para. 7 & 9, including Exhibit A.) Defendant used the credit card for purchase of goods, services, and cesh advances. (Id. para. 11 & 15; Exhibits A, B, C, D.) Payments and charges were duly reflected on 10 Plaintiff's record of the account; the records were provided to Defendant on a monthly basis. (Id. 11 para. 8, 11, 12, 13; Exhibits B, C, D.) Plaintiff defaulted on or before May 19, 2017. (Id. para. 12) 15; Exhibits A, B, C.) No payment has been made since January 9, 2017. (Id. para. 13; Exhibit 13 Je D.) The outstanding balance is $5,836.50. (Id. para. 15; Exhibits B & C.) - aE te a8 &B 14) Plaintiff's motion requests interest, but the Complaint does not allege interest owed or a8go 15 pray for interest as part of judgment. (Complaint at p.2 (para. 10(b)), p.3 (para CC-2.) RO ag 16 gia Summary adjudication is granted as to the claims for open book account and account ZE ag 17 ES stated in the single amount of $5,836.50. 18 C. Conclusion 19} If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, 20 Plaintiff shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court's ruling for the Court's signature, 21 pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all 22 parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court. 23 24 Dated: -2S- 25 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIO. RT 26| 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT