On December 05, 2017 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
American Express Centurion Bank,
and
Does 1 To 10,
Pittella, Rosanna,
for (09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
Pibmmi'p
'
(ATTORNEYORPARTYWITHOUTATFORNEYWAMEANDADDRESS)”. 'TELEE‘EHQNE:405;“2363599
‘ ‘
Foa'coqarqsepwx:
JenniferTunder CA SEN #291806
‘ ~-
6 \
A
x
-
A,
=
I
,
Law Offices of Rcbert 5 Gitméid, 13 ‘C
44Q1 NW 4th St Suite 109 Oklahoma City, OK 73107
.4
L
FMATEO-COUNT E B ‘
SAN
ATTORNEY mamme); Rosanna Eitteifa
0 8 2018
insert name of courtjudrcia1 district or branch calm, it any, and post office and street address; JAN
‘
Superior Court: of Catifo'mia
'
Couhty of San Mittco ‘'
400 County Confer ,
=
A
. -
‘ ‘
Redwood City? CA 94063 x .1 ,
’
M
,
San Mateo Hall ofJustice' Judlcxal stnct: ‘~
PLAINTIFF;
'
American Express Centunon Ban}~
DEFENQAN'T:
1131152111114 Pitteilga,
~
ANSWERmCQntract
\/
4 1
01452111114s
m 70 QOMPLNNT 91‘ ("met American Express Centurion Bank
. V
17(514055‘44
CZ] TO CROSS—COMPLAINT(name)
1 Ttits pmading; including attachments arid (exhibits
consists 0f the foliowing number of pages: 2,
2 DEFENDANT (name): RoSimx‘ia Piiwtia .
-
answers the complaint or cross-compidtnt as follows:
3. Check ONLY ONE of the next 11210 kidxoszt
a Defend-am gSnera’tty dSnies each staiement of the. compiaint or drdSS'~oomplaint
{Do not check this boxif
the ve’rifidd compiaint or cross-complaint domarzda mom than $1 000 )
[:3
V
b Defendant admi1s that all of thé statements of the complaint oz croSs~comp1atnt are true EXCEPT
(1) Dafendant (Saints thS following statements are faise‘, (use paragraph numbars er explain):
'
17— CLJ —05544
ARDL10
\1
Answer (Limited up to $10,000) BY: FAX
912412
}
Illllilllllllllllillllilll‘l J
Ej (3011111111211 011 Attachment 3. b (1).
Defendant has no information or betiet that 1:14.111: Iowmg' statements are trim, SD defendant denies them- (USS
(2)
paragraph numbegs, or explain)
[:3 ppqziggeq gn Afliaptimeht “3.123(2).
this {xx-m is. 1251123 to WNW a’cuzzmwmg
11 crow-comma! :xnd'fiafadééjnz mind: Wréfi‘mm'
543111311 1152:1123.
.
_
.
Mad 1 912
Fennimpmwwtnetiamt Um
Jmizcixd Comet! at 6.11:1"d
‘
‘
ANSWER _ '
'
CORfl’aCt
V
'
C6111: of Cl
Wmmc‘z r 42' 12
wwmiqimi. c.1244
lmutqyt: 21307]
PLO-0010 [REV
i K
PLD-C-MO
"
' ’
SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER:
American'fixprcss Centurion. Bank VS 'Rosanha Pit’teiia, ct: aI 1761;105544
ANSWEIiQ—Coniract
4. I l I
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Gofendantaueges the foIIowinguadditionaI réasons that plaintiff is not
enIiIIod to recover anything:
Ambiguity- Plaintiff did not (3161111); state the amount 01‘ the issuc(s) in this case. Unclezm Hands;
-
Plaintiff wouid receive more money than it deserves if it wins.1nva1id/Iliogai
Unjust 13.111161111131111-
Contract~Thc contract is invalid/1111311}, and 12111111111111. enforced because of fraud deceit 0.1:
ID1816131L§GIIEZIIIOU Ail or part of the contract: or transaction rosuItcd 110m fmud deceit 01:
misrcpicscmalion b3 Pl‘ziintiff or andthor party Invcxiid/Ilicgdl Contract-The coritrzict is invalidliiicgai I
and cannot be enforced because of Iack’.‘ of 21c¢cptan¢c Inimiidfliiegai Contrtict'lfho contract is I
iiwaiid/ilicgai and cannot be oniorcod because: of, Iack of consideraiion Invalidflilogal Contract—The
coiitmct is invalid/illegal and cannot ho enforced bccausc of mismko Waiver Standing-g Plaintiff 18
not 11 he I cntcrcd the Contract with it did not provide a copy of an agreement which shows it is. the
legal owncr of the aIIcged debt. and the fight to bring this cause to colicct the débt. [31111111. to state a -
3
case of action Plaintiff Faiiod to state an essential (Element for: Breach oi contract: it did not state the i
‘
.9116c C data the contract was cntoted into/ it. did not state the spocific date the centract was
brcachcdfnot complied witI1.No Dzhnagé to Plaintiff Usui‘y-Cai Civ Code §§ 1914. 1‘21 .2I916. I.?. 2.
Lactic of Inrisdictihn Plaintiff failed to 01 vc credit Io: payments 1nadc.I‘~7aiIurc of validation of debts
§ I692g § 809.
Imwi Continued on Attachment 4.
5. 1:] OIher
6. DEFENDANT PRAYS
a. that plaintiff take nothing.
9- [Z] for costs ofsoit.
0. 1:3 other (specify):
Jenniferlundcr ....... , .................
(“Inn at mint name)
‘
.
I m Myer at:
/\\‘-— '
I’LD—C-UwwJamm' 1. 20011
.
ANSWER—COMFQCt
‘
/
y
"1/ .
(79111111111937! my)
at:
Page 2
Document Filed Date
January 08, 2018
Case Filing Date
December 05, 2017
Category
(09) Limited Other Collections - under 10,000
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Pibmmi'p ' (ATTORNEYORPARTYWITHOUTATFORNEYWAMEANDADDRESS)”. 'TELEE‘EHQNE:405;“2363599 ‘ ‘ Foa'coqarqsepwx: JenniferTunder CA SEN #291806 ‘ ~- 6 \ A x - A, = I , Law Offices of Rcbert 5 Gitméid, 13 ‘C 44Q1 NW 4th St Suite 109 Oklahoma City, OK 73107 .4 L FMATEO-COUNT E B ‘ SAN ATTORNEY mamme); Rosanna Eitteifa 0 8 2018 insert name of courtjudrcia1 district or branch calm, it any, and post office and street address; JAN ‘ Superior Court: of Catifo'mia ' Couhty of San Mittco ‘' 400 County Confer , = A . - ‘ ‘ Redwood City? CA 94063 x .1 , ’ M , San Mateo Hall ofJustice' Judlcxal stnct: ‘~ PLAINTIFF; ' American Express Centunon Ban}~ DEFENQAN'T: 1131152111114 Pitteilga, ~ ANSWERmCQntract \/ 4 1 01452111114s m 70 QOMPLNNT 91‘ ("met American Express Centurion Bank . V 17(514055‘44 CZ] TO CROSS—COMPLAINT(name) 1 Ttits pmading; including attachments arid (exhibits consists 0f the foliowing number of pages: 2, 2 DEFENDANT (name): RoSimx‘ia Piiwtia . - answers the complaint or cross-compidtnt as follows: 3. Check ONLY ONE of the next 11210 kidxoszt a Defend-am gSnera’tty dSnies each staiement of the. compiaint or drdSS'~oomplaint {Do not check this boxif the ve’rifidd compiaint or cross-complaint domarzda mom than $1 000 ) [:3 V b Defendant admi1s that all of thé statements of the complaint oz croSs~comp1atnt are true EXCEPT (1) Dafendant (Saints thS following statements are faise‘, (use paragraph numbars er explain): ' 17— CLJ —05544 ARDL10 \1 Answer (Limited up to $10,000) BY: FAX 912412 } Illllilllllllllllillllilll‘l J Ej (3011111111211 011 Attachment 3. b (1). Defendant has no information or betiet that 1:14.111: Iowmg' statements are trim, SD defendant denies them- (USS (2) paragraph numbegs, or explain) [:3 ppqziggeq gn Afliaptimeht “3.123(2). this {xx-m is. 1251123 to WNW a’cuzzmwmg 11 crow-comma! :xnd'fiafadééjnz mind: Wréfi‘mm' 543111311 1152:1123. . _ . Mad 1 912 Fennimpmwwtnetiamt Um Jmizcixd Comet! at 6.11:1"d ‘ ‘ ANSWER _ ' ' CORfl’aCt V ' C6111: of Cl Wmmc‘z r 42' 12 wwmiqimi. c.1244 lmutqyt: 21307] PLO-0010 [REV i K PLD-C-MO " ' ’ SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER: American'fixprcss Centurion. Bank VS 'Rosanha Pit’teiia, ct: aI 1761;105544 ANSWEIiQ—Coniract 4. I l I AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Gofendantaueges the foIIowinguadditionaI réasons that plaintiff is not enIiIIod to recover anything: Ambiguity- Plaintiff did not (3161111); state the amount 01‘ the issuc(s) in this case. Unclezm Hands; - Plaintiff wouid receive more money than it deserves if it wins.1nva1id/Iliogai Unjust 13.111161111131111- Contract~Thc contract is invalid/1111311}, and 12111111111111. enforced because of fraud deceit 0.1: ID1816131L§GIIEZIIIOU Ail or part of the contract: or transaction rosuItcd 110m fmud deceit 01: misrcpicscmalion b3 Pl‘ziintiff or andthor party Invcxiid/Ilicgdl Contract-The coritrzict is invalidliiicgai I and cannot be enforced because of Iack’.‘ of 21c¢cptan¢c Inimiidfliiegai Contrtict'lfho contract is I iiwaiid/ilicgai and cannot be oniorcod because: of, Iack of consideraiion Invalidflilogal Contract—The coiitmct is invalid/illegal and cannot ho enforced bccausc of mismko Waiver Standing-g Plaintiff 18 not 11 he I cntcrcd the Contract with it did not provide a copy of an agreement which shows it is. the legal owncr of the aIIcged debt. and the fight to bring this cause to colicct the débt. [31111111. to state a - 3 case of action Plaintiff Faiiod to state an essential (Element for: Breach oi contract: it did not state the i ‘ .9116c C data the contract was cntoted into/ it. did not state the spocific date the centract was brcachcdfnot complied witI1.No Dzhnagé to Plaintiff Usui‘y-Cai Civ Code §§ 1914. 1‘21 .2I916. I.?. 2. Lactic of Inrisdictihn Plaintiff failed to 01 vc credit Io: payments 1nadc.I‘~7aiIurc of validation of debts § I692g § 809. Imwi Continued on Attachment 4. 5. 1:] OIher 6. DEFENDANT PRAYS a. that plaintiff take nothing. 9- [Z] for costs ofsoit. 0. 1:3 other (specify): Jenniferlundcr ....... , ................. (“Inn at mint name) ‘ . I m Myer at: /\\‘-— ' I’LD—C-UwwJamm' 1. 20011 . ANSWER—COMFQCt ‘ / y "1/ . (79111111111937! my) at: Page 2