On December 07, 2007 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Verdusco, Jose,
and
County Of San Mateo,
Mar, Andy,
for civil
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
1 TODD P. EMANUEL (SBN 169301}
2
EMANUEL L,AW GROUP
702 Marshall
Redwood
Telephone:
Street,
City,
Suite
California
(650)
400
94063
369.8900
P
SAN M@T
II E
TEO GOUgP(
g ELECTRQN ICALLY
Il' LE D
Facsimile: ( 650 369.4228 Svperlor Covrt of Cslifornrs,
R1 II County of Ssn Francisco
Attorneys
JOSE
for Plaintiff
VERDUSCO
02/24/2016
Clerk of the Court
tSYtRONNIE OTERO
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
10
OV 5S'r l'$y
CASE NO. CGC-16-549709
JOSE VERDUSCO,
PLAINTIFF JOSE VERDUSCO'S NON-
Plaintiff, OPPOSITION TO COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO'S MOTION FOR VENUE
13 vs. TRANSFER
14 ANDY MAR, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
and DOES 1-20 inclusive Date: March 8, 2016
15 Time: 9:30 a.m.
Defendants. Dept.: 302
16
17
Complaint filed: January 5, 2016
18 Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith
19 Reservation No. 02010308-11
20
2l Subject to and without waiving Plaintiff's right to seek that venue be transferred
away from the County of San Mateo pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section
397, Plaintiff JOSE VERDUSCO submits this non-opposition to Defendant County of San
Mateo's Motion for Venue Transfer from the County of San Francisco to the County of San
Mateo.
26 0
27 0
28
Non-Opposition to CSM's tVotion for VenueTransfer,Case No.
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: Februaryd& 2016 EMANUEL LAW GROUP
TODD P. EMANUEL
Attorney for Plaintiff JOSE VERDUSCO
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Non-Opposition to CSM's Motion for Venue Transfer,Case No.
CASE NAME: VerChsco v. Mar, et al.
CASE NO.: San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-16-649709
3 PROOF OF SERVICE
4
1 am employed in the City of Redwood City, County of San Mateo, State of
California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My
business address is 702 Marshall Street, Suite 400, Redwood City, California 94063.
6
On the date set forth below, following ordinary business practice, I served a true
copy of the foregoing document(s) described as:
PLAINTIFF JOSE VERDUSCO'S NON-OPPOSITION TO COUNTY OF SAN NIATEO'S
MOTION FOR VENUE TRANSFER
10 (BY FAX) by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax
number(s) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list,on this date.
(BY MAIL) I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be
12 placed in the United States mail at Redwood City, California.
{BY E-MAIL) by transmitting via electronic mail the document(s) listed above to
the email address(es) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list,
on this date.
(BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I caused such envelope(s) to be deiivered to an
overnight delivery carrier with delivery fees provided for, addressed to the
16 person(s) on whom it is tobe served.
17 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand
to the addressee(s).
18
Sandra Zuniga Nierenberg Attorney for Defendant
SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
400 County Center
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 363.4755
Facsimile: (650) 363.4034
Email: snierenbera(msmcoov.os
(State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the above is true and correct.
24
f
Executed on February 24, 2016 at Redwood City, California
25
Edwina Feguis
27 C
PROOF OF SERVICE - CASE NO. CGC-16-549709
Document Filed Date
March 11, 2016
Case Filing Date
December 07, 2007
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.