Preview
RETURN DATE: APRIL 30, 2024 SUPERIOR COURT
THOMAS BROCUGLIO J.D. OF HARTFORD
vs. AT HARTFORD
ALLEN GANTER APRIL 3, 2024
COMPLAINT
Count One: (By the Plaintiff as against the Defendant)
1 At all times relevant to this complaint the Plaintiff, Thomas Brocuglio, was and is a
resident of Enfield, Connecticut.
At all times relevant to this complaint the Defendant, Allen Ganter, was a resident of
Cromwell, Connecticut and was an officer of the Meriden Police Department.
On or about December 8, 2023, at approximately 3:45 p.m., the Plaintiff was driving his
truck on France Street in Rocky Hill, and was approaching the intersection of France
Street and Cromwell Avenue.
At the same time and place, the Defendant was operating his vehicle on the
aforementioned France Street, and was stopped directly ahead of Plaintiff's vehicle.
As the two vehicles remained stopped on France Street, the Defendant exited his vehicle,
displayed his badge to the Plaintiff, and purported to take down Plaintiff's license plate in
order to arrest or ticket him.
When the Plaintiff questioned the propriety of Defendant’s conduct and asked for his
badge number, the Defendant suddenly, and without warning or provocation, lunged into
1
Maki Law, tc
467 Naubue Avenue + Glastonbury CT 06033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
Juris No. 437597
the driver’s side window of Plaintiff's vehicle striking Plaintiffin the face with his fist,
causing the harms and losses more fully set forth below.
7 As a direct and proximate result of said collision, caused by the Defendant's willful and/or
wanton assault ofthe Plaintiff, the Plaintiff suffered physical injuries, some, or all, of which may
be permanent in nature, including the following:
a. cervical spine injury;
b. facial injuries;
c. swelling and contusions.
As a further direct and proximate result of the Defendant's negligence and/or
carelessness, the Plaintiff was forced to expend sums for medical care and treatment, and
will be caused to expend further such sums in the future.
As a further direct and proximate result of the negligence and/or carelessness of the
Defendant, the Plaintiff has been and will be impaired in his ability to pursue and enjo
life’s pleasures.
2
Maki Law, uc
467 Naubuc Avenue + Glastonbury Cl’ 06033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
Juris No. 437597
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff claims and demands:
Compensatory damages:
Common law punitive/exemplary damages;
Costs of suit;
Such other relief deemed fair, just and reasonable.
THE PLAINTIFF
THOMAS BROCUGLIO
Bren Maki, of
Mak’ LLC
-His Attorneys-
Be
Maki Law, ic
467 Naubue Avenue + Glastonbury N6033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
Juris No, 437597
RETURN DATE: APRIL 30, 2024 SUPERIOR COURT
THOMAS BROCUGLIO J.D. OF HARTFORD
VS. AT HARTFORD
ALLEN GANTER APRIL 3, 2024
AMOUNT IN DEMAND
The amount in demand is in excess of FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000.00)
exclusive of costs and interest.
THE PLAINTIFF
THOMAS BROCUGLIO
Maki Law, LLC
-His Attorneys
4
Maki Law, tic
467 Naubue Avenue + Glastonbury CT 06033 + 860.269.5780 + Facsimile: 860.221.3947
Juris No. 437597
Related Documents in Hartford County