On March 15, 2022 a No Value was filed involving a dispute between Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp, Arntsen, Robert, Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship, Ho, John, Huang, Quanyu, Lee, Mary, and Black Horse Holdings, Llc, Bragg, David M, Caproc Iii, Llc, Davis, Gregory J, Huang, Quanyu, Huish, Dale, Justesen, Jason, Kludt, Kurtis Stuart, Mclan Trust, Monks Family Trust, Oneil, Scott, Paramont Capital, Llc, Paramont Woodside, Llc, Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc, Stoker, Diane, Stoker, Phil, Svrv 385 Moore, Llc, Svrv 387 Moore, Llc, Teh Capital, Llc, Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust, Wolfe, Kevin, Wz Partners Llc, for (16) Unlimited Fraud in the District Court of San Mateo County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
CIV-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY 322720 STATE BAR NUMBER: FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: Collin James Vierra FIRM NAME: Eimer Stahl LLP STREET ADDRESS: 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 1025 CITY: Campbell STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 95008 TELEPHONE NO.: 408-889-1668 FAX NO.: 312-692-1718 E-MAIL ADDRESS: cvierra@eimerstahl.com ATTORNEY FOR (name): Plaintiffs (Robert Arntsen et al.) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center MAILING ADDRESS: 400 County Center CITY AND ZIP CODE: Redwood City, CA 94063 BRANCH NAME: Civil PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert Arntsen et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Gregory J. Davis et al. CASE NUMBER: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 22-CIV-01148 A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return is provided with the document. This form may not be used for dismissal of a derivative action or a class action or of any party or cause of action in a class action. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.) 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) With prejudice (2) Without prejudice b. (1) Complaint (2) Petition (3) Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (4) Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (5) Entire action of all parties and all causes of action (6) Other (specify):* Causes of Action 10, 11, 12 and 13 (Breach of Contract) to the Second Amended Complaint as to David Bragg and Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC 2. (Complete in all cases except family law cases.) The court did did not waive court fees and costs for a party in this case. (This information may be obtained from the clerk. If court fees and costs were waived, the declaration on the back of this form must be completed). Date: 3/28/2024 Collin J. Vierra (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) *If dismissal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of action only, or Attorney or party without attorney for: of specified cross-complaints only, so state and identify the parties, causes of action, Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent or cross-complaints to be dismissed Cross-Complainant 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given.** Date: 3/28/2024 Collin J. Vierra (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) ** If a cross-complaint - or Response (Family Law) seeking affirmative relief - is on Attorney or party without attorney for: file, the attorney for cross-complainant (respondent) must sign this consent if required Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent by Code of Civil Procedure section 581 (i) or (j). Cross-Complainant 4. Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 5. Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 6. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 7. a. Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date): b. Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide a copy to be conformed means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy Page 1 of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Code of Civil Procedure, § 581 et seq.; Judicial Council of California Gov. Code, § 68637(c); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1390 CIV-110 [Rev. January 1, 2013] www.courts.ca.gov CIV-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert Arntsen et al. CASE NUMBER: 22-CIV-01148 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Gregory J. Davis et al. COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND COSTS If a party whose court fees and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other means, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. The court may refuse to dismiss the case until the lien is satisfied. (Gov. Code, § 68637.) Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees 1. The court waived court fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. The person named in item 1 is (check one below): a. not recovering anything of value by this action. b. recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (If item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3. All court fees and court costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): Yes No I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) Page 2 of 2 CIV-110 [Rev. January 1, 2013] REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL