arrow left
arrow right
  • ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al  vs.  GREGORY J DAVIS, et al(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al  vs.  GREGORY J DAVIS, et al(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al  vs.  GREGORY J DAVIS, et al(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
  • ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al  vs.  GREGORY J DAVIS, et al(16) Unlimited Fraud document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Collin J. Vierra (State Bar No. 322720) EIMER STAHL LLP 2 99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95113-1605 3 Telephone: (408) 889-1668 4 Email: cvierra@eimerstahl.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 8 9 Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arntsen Family Case No. 22-CIV-01148 10 Partnership, LP; Brian Christopher Dunn Consolidated with Case No. 23-CIV-01099 Custodianship, John Ho, and Quanyu Huang; 11 Date: March 11, 2024 12 Plaintiffs, Time: 2:00 p.m. v. Dept. 24 13 David M. Bragg; Silicon Valley Real Ventures Date Action Filed: March 15, 2022 14 LLC; SVRV 385 Moore, LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Gregory J. Davis; Kevin Wolfe; Hon. Jeffrey Finigan 15 Jason Justesen; Paramont Woodside, LLC; 16 Paramont Capital, LLC; Monks Family Trust; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING TEH Capital LLC; Caproc III, LLC; WZ PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE 17 Partners, LLC; McClan Trust; Wild Rose NO. 7 TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE, Irrevocable Trust; Black Horse Holdings, TESTMONY, AND ARGUMENT AS TO 18 LLC; Phil Stoker; Diane Stoker; Scott O’Neil; WHETHER ANY PLAINTIFF WAS AN Dale Huish; and DOES 1–20, ACCREDITED INVESTOR 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7 1 The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion In Limine No. 7. 2 The Defendants, their counsel, and all witnesses are not to introduce any evidence, 3 testimony, or argument that any Plaintiff was an accredited investor at any time during the trial. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Date: _______________ __________________________ 7 Hon. Jeffrey Finigan 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7