Document for ARNTSEN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP, et al vs. GREGORY J DAVIS, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1   Collin J. Vierra (State Bar No. 322720)
     EIMER STAHL LLP
 2   99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 600
     San Jose, CA 95113-1605
 3   Telephone: (408) 889-1668
 4   Email: cvierra@eimerstahl.com

 5   Attorney for Plaintiffs

 6

 7                     SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                                      COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
 8

 9
      Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arntsen Family        Case No. 22-CIV-01148
10    Partnership, LP; Brian Christopher Dunn         Consolidated with Case No. 23-CIV-01099
      Custodianship, John Ho, and Quanyu Huang;
11                                                    Date: March 11, 2024
12                   Plaintiffs,                      Time: 2:00 p.m.
      v.                                              Dept. 24
13
      David M. Bragg; Silicon Valley Real Ventures    Date Action Filed: March 15, 2022
14    LLC; SVRV 385 Moore, LLC; SVRV 387
      Moore, LLC; Gregory J. Davis; Kevin Wolfe;      Hon. Jeffrey Finigan
15    Jason Justesen; Paramont Woodside, LLC;
16    Paramont Capital, LLC; Monks Family Trust;      [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
      TEH Capital LLC; Caproc III, LLC; WZ            PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE
17    Partners, LLC; McClan Trust; Wild Rose          NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE,
      Irrevocable Trust; Black Horse Holdings,        TESTIMONY, OR ARGUMENT THAT
18    LLC; Phil Stoker; Diane Stoker; Scott O’Neil;   THE PARAMONT DEFENDANTS DID
      Dale Huish; and DOES 1–20,                      NOT RECEIVE THE FILE BEARING
19
                                                      THE TITLE “DETAIL INV SPENT”
20                   Defendants.                      AND BATES NUMBER DAVIS000494 IN
                                                      JULY OR AUGUST 2019
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


                                   PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3
 1            The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion In Limine No. 3.

 2            The Defendants, their counsel, and all witnesses are not to introduce any evidence,

 3   testimony, or argument that the Paramont Defendants did not receive the file bearing the title

 4   “detail inv spent” and Bates number DAVIS000494 in July or August 2019 at any time during the

 5   trial.

 6            IT IS SO ORDERED.

 7

 8   Date: _______________                             __________________________

 9                                                     Hon. Jeffrey Finigan

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
                                                  2
                                  PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3