arrow left
arrow right
  • County of Sonoma vs THE HANSEN FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 16, 2011 Civil document preview
  • County of Sonoma vs THE HANSEN FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 16, 2011 Civil document preview
  • County of Sonoma vs THE HANSEN FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 16, 2011 Civil document preview
  • County of Sonoma vs THE HANSEN FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 16, 2011 Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

—"— ”, ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address). POS-010 FOR COURT USE ONLY }~ Ivan Jimenez 313644 Office of Sonoma County Counsel 575 Administration Dr., Ste. 105A Santa Rosa, CA 95403 tevepHoneno: 707.565.2421 FAXNO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona) Ivan. Jimenez@sonoma-county.org ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF County of Sonoma street aopress:600 Administration Drive MAILING ADDRESS: crrvanozipcope: Santa Rosa, CA 95403 srancHNaMe:Hall of Justice PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: County of Sonoma CASE NUMBER: 23CV02161 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: David Scott Hansen and Regina Victoria Hansen As Trustees, et.al. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Ref. No. or File No. (Separate proof of service is required for each party served.) At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action. | served copies of: a. (XJ summons b. [QQ compiaint . [R] Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) package . X) Civil Case Cover Sheet (served in complex cases only) CQ cross-complaint other (specify documents): First Amended Complaint; Notice of Assignment to One Judge; Notice of Availability of Court-Provided Court Reporters Party served (specify name of party as shown on documents served): David Scott Hansen As Trustees Of the HansenFamil: y Trust, Dated March 16, 2011, and the Hansen Family Trust, Dated March 16, 2011 (CQ Person (other than the party in item 3a) served on behalf of an entity or as an authorized agent (and not a person under item 5b on whom substituted service was made) (specify name and relationship to the party named in item 3a): Address where the party was served: gaq4 BRAND LANE, PENNGROVE, CA 94951, Sonoma Cty. (Home) | served the party (check proper box) a. () by personal service. | personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to Teceive service of process for the party (1) on (date): JAN, 26, 2024 (2) at (timejk: 15PM b. (2) by substituted service. On (date): at (time): left the documents listed in item 2 with or in the presence of (name and title or relationship to person indicated in item 3): (4) CC] (business) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the office or usual place of business of the person to be served. | informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. 2) CY (home) a competent member of the household (at least 18 years of age) at the dwelling house or usual place of abode of the party. | informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. (3) CC) (physical address unknown) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the usual malling address of the person to be served, other than a United States Postal Service post office box. | informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. (4) (Q) I thereafter mailed (by first-class, postage prepaid) copies of the documents to the person to be served at the place where the copies were left (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.20). | mailed the documents on (date) : from (city): or (L) a declaration of mailing is attached. (6) (CQ lattach a declaration of diligence stating actions taken first to attempt personal service. Page 1 of 2 Form Ad ted for Mandatory Use Judicial re ‘ouncil of California CEB {2\Forms" Essential PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Code of Civil Procedure, § 417.10 POS-010 [Rev. January 1, 21 1 cebcom COS v Hansen PLAINTI-F/PETITIONER: County of Sonoma 7 CASE NUMBER: [ DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:David 23CV02161 Scott Hansen, et.al. 5. c. (] by mail and acknowledgment of receipt of service. | maile d the documents listed in item 2 to the party, to the address shown in item 4, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, (1) on (date) : (2) from (city) : @O with two copies of the Notice and Acknowledgment of Rece! iptand a postage-paid return envelope addressed to me. (Attach completed Notice and Acknowl ledgment of Receipt.) (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.30.) (4) C2] to an address outside California with return r eceipt requested. (Code Civ. Proc., § 41 5.40.) d. CC) by other means (specify means of service and autho izing code section): C2) Additional page describing service is attached. The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the summons) was complet ed as follows: a. KX] as an individual defendant. b. (2) as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify) : °, - CY as occupant. Trustees Of the Hansen Famly Trust, Dated March 16, 2011, and the d, On behalf of (specify): . en Famils Tru ist, Dated March 16, 2011 under the following Code of Civil Proceduré sectior in: CY 416.10 (corporation) (] 415.95 (business organization, form unknown) CQ 416.20 (defunct corporation) CQ 416.60 (minor) CC] 416.30 (joint stock company/association) Co] 416.70 (ward or conservatee) (L} 416.40 (association or partnership) 416.90 (authorized person) CQ) 416.50 (public entity) C) 415.46 (occupant) CD other: Person who served papers Name: Address: Telephone number: The feefor service was:$ 150.00 Time/Mileage lam: (1) [C) nota registered California process server. (2) KC) exempt from registration under Business and Professions Code section 22350(b). (3) KX) registered California process server: @ (< owner C2) employee C21 independent contractor, (ii) Registration No.:__ P-374 (i) County: Sonoma Cty. 8. XX] I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. or 9. (2) lama California sheriff or marshal and | certify that the foregoing is true and correct. LAS Date: 1/26/2024 Dennis A. Bartels (NAME OF PERSON WHO SERVED PAPERS/SHERIFF OR MARSHAL) » (SIGNATURE) POS-010 [Rev. January 1, 2007] PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Page 2 of 2 CEB’ cebcom | Essential f\Forms- COS v Hansen