arrow left
arrow right
  • PETE G. CORRALES & CARMEN C. CORRALES TRUST Print Trust  document preview
  • PETE G. CORRALES & CARMEN C. CORRALES TRUST Print Trust  document preview
  • PETE G. CORRALES & CARMEN C. CORRALES TRUST Print Trust  document preview
  • PETE G. CORRALES & CARMEN C. CORRALES TRUST Print Trust  document preview
						
                                

Preview

' LOUIE A. RUIZ (SBN: 309657) GEORGE V. KARR (SBN: 339298) ae ”'4 j VISTAs LAW GROUP, LLP 430 N. Vineyard Ave., Suite 303 COUSET OFRCNAkggsgm StépOEURégYR Ontario, California 91764 SAN BSRNARDWD DISTRICT Telephone: (213) 745-8747 h JkLHN Facsimile: (213) 745—8748 NUV 1a 2023 Email: lruiz@vistaslawgroup.com gkarr@vistaslawgroup.com N Daniel Richard Morena DEPWY Attorneys for Respondent, \OOO\)O\KII LORRAINE CORRALES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Case No.: PROPSl 100680 IN THE MATTER OF: Honorable Michelle Gillece, Judge Presiding PETE CORRALES AND CARMEN C. G. CORRALES REVOCABLE TRUST Dated November 25, 1994 RESPONDENT LORRAINE CORRALES’ MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF GILERT CORRALES, Petitioner, MSJ Judge: Damian Garcia Date: November 13, 2023 vs. Time: 1:30 pm. Location: Superior Coufi of LORRAINE CORRALES, County of California, San Bernardino — Respondent. Department F1 - Fontana PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent LORRAINE CORRALES (“Lorraine), through her counsel, hereby submits her Mandatory Settlement Conference Brief pursuant to California Rules ofCourt, Rule 3.1380(0): I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF THE CASE On June 18, 2019, Petitioner, GILBERT CORRALES (“Petitioner”) filed the Petition to/for: (1) An Immediate Order that Lorraine Corrales Not Use Funds to Pay for the Defense of 1 RESPONDENT LORRAINE CORRALES’ MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF this Action; (2) An Immediate that Lorraine Corrales Prepare a Formal Accounting; (3) An Order that Lorraine Corrales Distribute the Trust Assets to Gilbert Corrales; (4) Damages due to Lorraine Corrales Breach of Trust and Failure to Distribute Assets (“Petition”) MORE THAN AWN FIVE (5) YEARS AFTER he signed a “Waiver of Accounting/Approval of Continued Use of Client Trust Account for Corrales Trust Funds/Approval of Any Future Sale of Real Property Owned by Trust/Approval of Trust and Amendments” on January 28, 2013 (“January 28, 2013 \DOOQGLII Waiver and Approval”). Lorraine has filed an objection and the case is now live. Discovery has now been closed per Petitioner’s convenient request with exception to the Deposition of the administration attorney, Jason L. Gaudy’s deposition and four (4) motions to compel of written discovery 10 pending and filed by Lorraine due t0 Petitioner’s conduct constituting misuse of the discovery 11 process. 12 Trial is set for March 4, 2024. The evidence will show that (1) Lorraine did not 13 mismanage Petitioner’s share of the estate; (2) Lorraine has not been compensated by a trustee 14 t0 this date; and (3) Petitioner has not been damaged in any way by Lorraine. 15 II. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS 16 The estate began with the Pete G. Corrales (“Trustor Pete”) and Carmen C. Corrales 17 (“Trustor Carmen”) (collectively as the “‘Trustors”) created the “November 25, 1994 Trust.” 18 Attached hereto and incorporated by reference as “Exhibit 1” is a copy 0f the November 25, 19 1994 Trust. This is a sad case that truly illustrates that “n0 good deed goes unpunished.” Lorraine 20 has done nothing but care for her brother, Petitioner, and has done nothing to damage him or his 21 estate. Petitioner is a recovering alcoholic and would be dead 0r homeless but for Respondent’s 22 care. 23 From this context, it is important to understand how we got here. The Trustors are the 24 deceased parents of the parties. Trustor Pete died on July 3 1, 2011 and Trustor Carmen died on 25 October 11, 201 1. On October 1 1, 201 1, the November 25, 1994 Trust became irrevocable. On 26 October 1, 201 1, Petitioner and Respondent inherited the following assets as follows: 27 28 2 RESPONDENT LORRAINE CORRALES’ MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF