On September 26, 2011 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Corrales, Gilbert,
Corrales, Lorraine,
and
for Trust
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
'
LOUIE A. RUIZ (SBN: 309657)
GEORGE V. KARR (SBN: 339298) ae ”'4 j
VISTAs LAW GROUP, LLP
430 N. Vineyard Ave., Suite 303 COUSET OFRCNAkggsgm
StépOEURégYR
Ontario, California 91764 SAN BSRNARDWD DISTRICT
Telephone: (213) 745-8747 h
JkLHN
Facsimile: (213) 745—8748 NUV 1a 2023
Email: lruiz@vistaslawgroup.com
gkarr@vistaslawgroup.com N Daniel Richard Morena
DEPWY
Attorneys for Respondent,
\OOO\)O\KII
LORRAINE CORRALES
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Case No.: PROPSl 100680
IN THE MATTER OF: Honorable Michelle Gillece, Judge
Presiding
PETE CORRALES AND CARMEN C.
G.
CORRALES REVOCABLE TRUST Dated
November 25, 1994 RESPONDENT LORRAINE
CORRALES’ MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF
GILERT CORRALES,
Petitioner, MSJ Judge: Damian Garcia
Date: November 13, 2023
vs. Time: 1:30 pm.
Location: Superior Coufi of
LORRAINE CORRALES, County of
California,
San Bernardino —
Respondent. Department F1 -
Fontana
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent LORRAINE CORRALES (“Lorraine),
through her counsel, hereby submits her Mandatory Settlement Conference Brief pursuant to
California Rules ofCourt, Rule 3.1380(0):
I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF THE CASE
On June 18, 2019, Petitioner, GILBERT CORRALES (“Petitioner”) filed the Petition
to/for: (1) An Immediate Order that Lorraine Corrales Not Use Funds to Pay for the Defense of
1
RESPONDENT LORRAINE CORRALES’ MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF
this Action; (2) An Immediate that Lorraine Corrales Prepare a Formal Accounting; (3) An Order
that Lorraine Corrales Distribute the Trust Assets to Gilbert Corrales; (4) Damages due to
Lorraine Corrales Breach of Trust and Failure to Distribute Assets (“Petition”) MORE THAN
AWN
FIVE (5) YEARS AFTER he signed a “Waiver of Accounting/Approval of Continued Use of
Client Trust Account for Corrales Trust Funds/Approval of Any Future Sale of Real Property
Owned by Trust/Approval of Trust and Amendments” on January 28, 2013 (“January 28, 2013
\DOOQGLII
Waiver and Approval”).
Lorraine has filed an objection and the case is now live. Discovery has now been closed
per Petitioner’s convenient request with exception to the Deposition of the administration
attorney, Jason L. Gaudy’s deposition and four (4) motions to compel of written discovery
10
pending and filed by Lorraine due t0 Petitioner’s conduct constituting misuse of the discovery
11
process.
12
Trial is set for March 4, 2024. The evidence will show that (1) Lorraine did not
13
mismanage Petitioner’s share of the estate; (2) Lorraine has not been compensated by a trustee
14
t0 this date; and (3) Petitioner has not been damaged in any way by Lorraine.
15
II. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
16
The estate began with the Pete G. Corrales (“Trustor Pete”) and Carmen C. Corrales
17
(“Trustor Carmen”) (collectively as the “‘Trustors”) created the “November 25, 1994 Trust.”
18
Attached hereto and incorporated by reference as “Exhibit 1” is a copy 0f the November 25,
19
1994 Trust. This is a sad case that truly illustrates that “n0 good deed goes unpunished.” Lorraine
20
has done nothing but care for her brother, Petitioner, and has done nothing to damage him or his
21
estate. Petitioner is a recovering alcoholic and would be dead 0r homeless but for Respondent’s
22
care.
23
From this context, it is important to understand how we got here. The Trustors are the
24
deceased parents of the parties. Trustor Pete died on July 3 1, 2011 and Trustor Carmen died on
25
October 11, 201 1. On October 1 1, 201 1, the November 25, 1994 Trust became irrevocable. On
26
October 1, 201 1, Petitioner and Respondent inherited the following assets as follows:
27
28
2
RESPONDENT LORRAINE CORRALES’ MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BRIEF
Document Filed Date
November 13, 2023
Case Filing Date
September 26, 2011
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.